a Federal University of Rio De Janeiro , Rio De Janeiro , Brazil.
Res Sports Med. 2013;21(4):355-66. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2013.825800.
The purposes of this study were to compare the repetition performance and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in different exercises order of three resistance training (RT) exercises: bench press (BP), shoulder press (SP), and triceps extension (TE). Twelve trained men participated in this study (26.75 ± 2.49 years; 177 ± 4.66 cm; 77.7 ± 6.20 kg; 12.61 ± 2.01% body fat; RT experience 3.58 ± 1.24 years). Data were collected in two phases: (1) 10 RM test for BP, SP, and TE and (2) performance of six RT sequences. The sequences were: SEQA (BP, SP, TE), SEQB (BP, TE, SP), SEQC (SP, BP, TE), SEQD (SP, TE, BP), SEQE (TE, BP, SP), and SEQF (TE, SP, BP). The repetition performance on SEQD was significantly smaller than SEQE and SEQF. No significant differences were found for repetition performance and RPE among other sequences. These data indicate that priority might be given to exercises performed in the beginning of the RT session.
本研究的目的是比较三种抗阻训练(RT)练习:卧推(BP)、肩推(SP)和三头肌伸展(TE)的不同练习顺序的重复表现和主观感觉用力程度(RPE)。12 名训练有素的男性参与了这项研究(26.75 ± 2.49 岁;177 ± 4.66 厘米;77.7 ± 6.20 公斤;12.61 ± 2.01%体脂;RT 经验 3.58 ± 1.24 年)。数据收集分为两个阶段:(1)10 RM 测试 BP、SP 和 TE;(2)进行 6 种 RT 序列的表现。序列为:SEQA(BP、SP、TE)、SEQB(BP、TE、SP)、SEQC(SP、BP、TE)、SEQD(SP、TE、BP)、SEQE(TE、BP、SP)和 SEQF(TE、SP、BP)。SEQD 的重复表现明显小于 SEQE 和 SEQF。其他序列的重复表现和 RPE 没有显著差异。这些数据表明,在 RT 训练开始时,优先考虑进行练习可能更有利。