Suppr超能文献

基于鞋类和性别在跳跃着陆任务中足底负荷的变化。

Changes in plantar loading based on shoe type and sex during a jump-landing task.

机构信息

Michael W. Krzyzewski Human Performance Research Laboratory, Doctor of Physical Therapy Division, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 2013 Sep-Oct;48(5):601-9. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.3.08. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Metatarsal stress fractures are common in cleated-sport athletes. Previous authors have shown that plantar loading varies with footwear, sex, and the athletic task.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of shoe type and sex on plantar loading in the medial midfoot (MMF), lateral midfoot (LMF), medial forefoot (MFF), middle forefoot (MidFF), and lateral forefoot (LFF) during a jump-landing task.

DESIGN

Crossover study.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-seven recreational athletes (14 men, 13 women) with no history of lower extremity injury in the last 6 months and no history of foot or ankle surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The athletes completed 7 jumping trials while wearing bladed-cleat, turf-cleat, and running shoes. Maximum force, contact area, contact time, and the force-time integral were analyzed in each foot region. We calculated 2 × 3 analyses of variance (α = .05) to identify shoe-condition and sex differences.

RESULTS

We found no shoe × sex interactions, but the MMF, LMF, MFF, and LFF force-time integrals were greater in men (P < .03). The MMF maximum force was less with the bladed-cleat shoes (P = .02). Total foot and MidFF maximum force was less with the running shoes (P < .01). The MFF and LFF maximum forces were different among all shoe conditions (P < .01). Total foot contact area was less in the bladed-cleat shoes (P = .01). The MMF contact area was greatest in the running shoes (P < .01). The LFF contact area was less in the running shoes (P = .03). The MFF and LFF force-time integrals were greater with the bladed-cleat shoes (P < .01). The MidFF force-time integral was less in the running shoes (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Independent of shoe, men and women loaded the foot differently during a jump landing. The bladed cleat increased forefoot loading, which may increase the risk for forefoot injury. The type of shoe should be considered when choosing footwear for athletes returning to activity after metatarsal stress fractures.

摘要

背景

钉鞋运动中跗骨应力性骨折很常见。先前的研究表明,足底负荷随鞋类、性别和运动任务而变化。

目的

研究鞋类类型和性别对跳跃着地任务中内侧中足(MMF)、外侧中足(LMF)、内侧前足(MFF)、中间前足(MidFF)和外侧前足(LFF)的足底负荷的影响。

设计

交叉研究。

设置

实验室。

患者或其他参与者

27 名无下肢损伤史(过去 6 个月)和足部或踝关节手术史的休闲运动员(男性 14 名,女性 13 名)。

主要观察指标

运动员穿着刀片钉鞋、草皮钉鞋和跑鞋完成了 7 次跳跃试验。分析每个足部区域的最大力、接触面积、接触时间和力-时间积分。我们计算了 2×3 方差分析(α=0.05)以确定鞋类条件和性别差异。

结果

我们没有发现鞋类×性别相互作用,但男性的 MMF、LMF、MFF 和 LFF 力-时间积分更大(P<0.03)。刀片钉鞋的 MMF 最大力较小(P=0.02)。跑鞋的总脚和 MidFF 最大力较小(P<0.01)。所有鞋类条件下的 MFF 和 LFF 最大力都不同(P<0.01)。刀片钉鞋的总脚接触面积较小(P=0.01)。跑鞋中的 MMF 接触面积最大(P<0.01)。跑鞋中的 LFF 接触面积较小(P=0.03)。刀片钉鞋的 MFF 和 LFF 力-时间积分更大(P<0.01)。跑鞋的 MidFF 力-时间积分较小(P<0.01)。

结论

无论鞋类如何,男性和女性在跳跃着地时足部受力方式不同。刀片钉鞋增加了前足的负荷,这可能会增加前足受伤的风险。选择运动员在跗骨应力性骨折后重返活动的鞋类时,应考虑鞋类类型。

相似文献

6
Effect of shoe type on plantar pressure: a gender comparison.鞋型对足底压力的影响:性别比较。
Gait Posture. 2010 Jan;31(1):18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.08.235. Epub 2009 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Soccer Footwear, Its Role in Injuries and Potential for Improvement.当前的足球鞋:其在损伤中的作用及改进潜力
Sports Med Int Open. 2018 May 25;2(2):E52-E61. doi: 10.1055/a-0608-4229. eCollection 2018 Apr.

本文引用的文献

2
Stress fractures in elite male football players.精英男性足球运动员的应力性骨折。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012 Jun;22(3):341-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01171.x. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
4
Effect of shoe type on plantar pressure: a gender comparison.鞋型对足底压力的影响:性别比较。
Gait Posture. 2010 Jan;31(1):18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.08.235. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
9
Stress fractures in athletes.运动员的应力性骨折
Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Oct;17(5):309-25. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0b013e3180421c8c.
10
Forefoot loading during 3 athletic tasks.3项体育任务期间的前足负荷
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):630-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546506295938. Epub 2007 Jan 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验