Taylor Jeffrey B, Nguyen Anh-Dung, Griffin Janet R, Ford Kevin R
a Department of Physical Therapy, Congdon School of Health Sciences , High Point , NC , USA.
b Department of Athletic Training, Congdon School of Health Sciences , High Point , NC , USA.
Sports Biomech. 2018 Jun;17(2):227-237. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2016.1271448. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
Metatarsal and midfoot injuries are common in American football. Footwear design may influence injury rates by altering plantar foot loading patterns in these regions. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cleat design on in-shoe plantar foot loading during a football-specific, resisted pushing task. Twenty competitive football players (age 14.7 ± 1.8 years, height 1.72 ± 0.10 m, and mass 71.8 ± 26.9 kg) completed three trials of pushing a weighted sled at maximal effort in a standard shoe (CLEAT) and artificial turf-specific shoe (TURF), with flexible in-shoe force measuring insoles. Repeated measures ANOVAs identified mean differences in maximum force and relative load under all regions of the foot. Results showed higher forces in the CLEAT under the medial (p < 0.001) and lateral (p = 0.004) midfoot, central (p = 0.007) and lateral (p < 0.001) forefoot, and lesser toes (p = 0.01), but lower forces in the hallux (p = 0.02) compared to the TURF shoe. Additionally, relative loading was higher in the CLEAT under the medial (p < 0.001) and lateral (p = 0.002) midfoot and lateral (p < 0.001) forefoot, but lower in the medial forefoot (p = 0.006) and hallux (p < 0.001) compared to the TURF shoe. The two shoes elicited distinct plantar loading profiles and may influence shoe selection decisions during injury prevention or rehabilitation practices.
跖骨和中足损伤在美国橄榄球运动中很常见。鞋类设计可能会通过改变这些区域的足底负荷模式来影响损伤率。本研究的目的是确定鞋钉设计对在特定橄榄球的抗阻推雪橇任务中鞋内足底负荷的影响。20名有竞争力的橄榄球运动员(年龄14.7±1.8岁,身高1.72±0.10米,体重71.8±26.9千克)穿着标准鞋(CLEAT)和人工草皮专用鞋(TURF),使用带有柔性鞋内测力鞋垫,以最大努力完成三次推加重雪橇的试验。重复测量方差分析确定了足部所有区域最大力和相对负荷的平均差异。结果显示,与TURF鞋相比,CLEAT鞋在内侧(p<0.001)和外侧(p=0.004)中足、中央(p=0.007)和外侧(p<0.001)前足以及小脚趾(p=0.01)处的力更高,但在拇趾处(p=0.02)的力更低。此外,与TURF鞋相比,CLEAT鞋在内侧(p<0.001)和外侧(p=0.002)中足以及外侧(p<0.001)前足的相对负荷更高,但在内侧前足(p=0.006)和拇趾(p<0.001)处的相对负荷更低。这两种鞋引发了不同的足底负荷分布,可能会影响在预防损伤或康复训练期间的鞋类选择决策。