Washington State University, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, PO Box 646420, Pullman, WA 99164-6420 USA.
Appl Spectrosc. 2013 Oct;67(10):1185-99. doi: 10.1366/12-06983.
Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) provides a potential method for rapid, in situ soil C measurement. In previous research on the application of LIBS to intact soil cores, we hypothesized that ultraviolet (UV) spectrum LIBS (200-300 nm) might not provide sufficient elemental information to reliably discriminate between soil organic C (SOC) and inorganic C (IC). In this study, using a custom complete spectrum (245-925 nm) core-scanning LIBS instrument, we analyzed 60 intact soil cores from six wheat fields. Predictive multi-response partial least squares (PLS2) models using full and reduced spectrum LIBS were compared for directly determining soil total C (TC), IC, and SOC. Two regression shrinkage and variable selection approaches, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and sparse multivariate regression with covariance estimation (MRCE), were tested for soil C predictions and the identification of wavelengths important for soil C prediction. Using complete spectrum LIBS for PLS2 modeling reduced the calibration standard error of prediction (SEP) 15 and 19% for TC and IC, respectively, compared to UV spectrum LIBS. The LASSO and MRCE approaches provided significantly improved calibration accuracy and reduced SEP 32-55% over UV spectrum PLS2 models. We conclude that (1) complete spectrum LIBS is superior to UV spectrum LIBS for predicting soil C for intact soil cores without pretreatment; (2) LASSO and MRCE approaches provide improved calibration prediction accuracy over PLS2 but require additional testing with increased soil and target analyte diversity; and (3) measurement errors associated with analyzing intact cores (e.g., sample density and surface roughness) require further study and quantification.
激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)为快速、原位土壤 C 测量提供了一种潜在的方法。在之前关于 LIBS 应用于完整土壤芯的研究中,我们假设紫外(UV)光谱 LIBS(200-300nm)可能无法提供足够的元素信息来可靠地区分土壤有机 C(SOC)和无机 C(IC)。在这项研究中,我们使用定制的全谱(245-925nm)芯扫描 LIBS 仪器,分析了来自六个麦田的 60 个完整土壤芯。使用全谱和简化谱 LIBS 比较了预测多元响应偏最小二乘法(PLS2)模型,以直接确定土壤总 C(TC)、IC 和 SOC。我们测试了两种回归收缩和变量选择方法,即最小绝对值收缩和选择算子(LASSO)和具有协方差估计的稀疏多元回归(MRCE),以用于土壤 C 预测和识别对土壤 C 预测重要的波长。与 UV 光谱 LIBS 相比,使用全谱 LIBS 进行 PLS2 建模分别将 TC 和 IC 的校准标准预测误差(SEP)降低了 15%和 19%。LASSO 和 MRCE 方法显著提高了校准精度,与 UV 光谱 PLS2 模型相比,SEP 降低了 32-55%。我们得出结论:(1)对于未经预处理的完整土壤芯,全谱 LIBS 优于 UV 光谱 LIBS 用于预测土壤 C;(2)LASSO 和 MRCE 方法提供了改进的校准预测精度,但需要进一步测试,增加土壤和目标分析物的多样性;(3)与分析完整芯相关的测量误差(例如,样品密度和表面粗糙度)需要进一步研究和量化。