• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

义齿美学指数的验证

Validation of the prosthetic esthetic index.

作者信息

Özhayat Esben B, Dannemand Katrine

机构信息

Section of Oral Rehabilitation, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Nørre Alle 20, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark,

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(5):1447-56. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1109-x. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-013-1109-x
PMID:24068286
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In order to diagnose impaired esthetics and evaluate treatments for these, it is crucial to evaluate all aspects of oral and prosthetic esthetics. No professionally administered index currently exists that sufficiently encompasses comprehensive prosthetic esthetics. This study aimed to validate a new comprehensive index, the Prosthetic Esthetic Index (PEI), for professional evaluation of esthetics in prosthodontic patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The content, criterion, and construct validity; the test-retest, inter-rater, and internal consistency reliability; and the sensitivity of the index were evaluated in 95 patients in need of oral rehabilitation.

RESULTS

The content validity was sufficient: Most correlations between aspects of the PEI were low (R > 0.5). The PEI was significantly correlated to the Dental Aesthetic Index (R = 0.52) and could distinguish between subgroups of patients indicating sufficient criterion and construct validity. The test-retest reliability showed an Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.80, the internal consistency reliability showed a Cronbach's alpha of 0.7; and the inter-rater reliability was excellent, with an ICC of 0.94. The PEI could furthermore distinguish between participants and controls, indicating sufficient sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

The PEI is considered a valid and reliable instrument involving sufficient aspects for assessment of the professionally evaluated esthetics in prosthodontic patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

With the validated PEI available, the clinician can directly assess and document the comprehensive esthetics of prosthodontic patients in a structured manner.

摘要

目的

为了诊断美学缺陷并评估针对这些缺陷的治疗方法,评估口腔和修复美学的各个方面至关重要。目前尚无专业管理的指数能够充分涵盖全面的修复美学。本研究旨在验证一种新的综合指数——修复美学指数(PEI),用于对修复患者的美学进行专业评估。

材料与方法

在95名需要口腔修复的患者中评估了该指数的内容效度、标准效度和结构效度;重测信度、评分者间信度和内部一致性信度;以及该指数的敏感性。

结果

内容效度充分:PEI各方面之间的大多数相关性较低(R>0.5)。PEI与牙科美学指数显著相关(R = 0.52),并且能够区分表明具有充分标准效度和结构效度的患者亚组。重测信度显示组内相关系数(ICC)为0.80,内部一致性信度显示Cronbach's alpha为0.7;评分者间信度极佳,ICC为0.94。此外,PEI能够区分参与者和对照组,表明具有充分的敏感性。

结论

PEI被认为是一种有效且可靠的工具,涵盖了评估修复患者专业评估美学的充分方面。

临床意义

有了经过验证的PEI,临床医生可以以结构化的方式直接评估和记录修复患者的综合美学。

相似文献

1
Validation of the prosthetic esthetic index.义齿美学指数的验证
Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(5):1447-56. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1109-x. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
2
Responsiveness of the Prosthetic Esthetic Scale.义齿美学量表的反应性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Apr;21(3):907-913. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1841-0. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
3
Esthetic Evaluation of Implant-Supported Single Crowns: The Implant Restoration Esthetic Index and Patient Perception.种植体支持的单冠的美学评估:种植体修复美学指数和患者感知。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e51-e58. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12659. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
4
Reliability and validity of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale in prosthodontic patients.修复患者的口腔美学量表的可靠性和有效性。
Int J Prosthodont. 2010 May-Jun;23(3):257-62.
5
Evaluation of implant esthetics using eight objective indices-Comparative analysis of reliability and validity.采用八项客观指标评估种植体美学效果-可靠性和有效性的对比分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jul;29(7):697-706. doi: 10.1111/clr.13261. Epub 2018 May 27.
6
Development and validation of the German version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale.德语版口腔面部美学量表的编制与验证
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jul;19(6):1443-50. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1365-4. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
7
Recognition of patient-reported impairment in oral aesthetics.认识患者报告的口腔美学受损情况。
J Oral Rehabil. 2014 Sep;41(9):692-9. doi: 10.1111/joor.12183. Epub 2014 May 17.
8
Development of a psychosocial perception scale and comparison of psychosocial perception of patients with extra oral defects before and after facial prosthesis.心理社会感知量表的编制及赝复体治疗前后面部缺损患者心理社会感知的比较
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Dec;128(6):1398-1404. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.017. Epub 2021 May 11.
9
Psychometric properties of the Albanian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-ALB.阿尔巴尼亚语版口面部美学量表(OES-ALB)的心理测量学特性
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Aug 26;15:97. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0083-x.
10
Development, validation and psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-Ar.口面部美学量表阿拉伯语版(OES-Ar)的开发、验证及心理测量学特性
J Prosthodont Res. 2017 Jul;61(3):290-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Dental esthetic screening index (DESI) scores among patients attending Qassim University dental clinics.卡西姆大学牙科诊所患者的牙齿美学筛查指数(DESI)得分。
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Jul;36(7):1031-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.04.007. Epub 2024 May 1.
2
Responsiveness of the Prosthetic Esthetic Scale.义齿美学量表的反应性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Apr;21(3):907-913. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1841-0. Epub 2016 Apr 30.

本文引用的文献

1
The assessment of dentofacial esthetics in restorative dentistry: a review of the literature.修复牙科中的牙颌面美学评估:文献综述。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 May;143(5):461-6. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0205.
2
Effect of treatment with fixed and removable dental prostheses. An oral health-related quality of life study.固定和可摘义齿修复治疗的效果。一项口腔健康相关生活质量的研究。
J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Jan;39(1):28-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02245.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
3
Response shift in oral health-related quality of life measurement in patients with partial edentulism.
部分牙列缺失患者口腔健康相关生活质量测量中的反应转移。
J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Jan;39(1):44-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02241.x. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
4
Oral health-related quality of life in patients treated by implant-supported fixed dentures and removable partial dentures.种植体支持的固定义齿和可摘局部义齿修复患者的口腔健康相关生活质量。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Aug;23(8):958-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02247.x. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
5
SAEF - Smile's Aesthetic Evaluation form: a useful tool to improve communications between clinicians and patients during multidisciplinary treatment.SAEF - 微笑美学评估表:一种在多学科治疗期间改善临床医生与患者之间沟通的有用工具。
Eur J Esthet Dent. 2011 Summer;6(2):160-76.
6
A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability.种植体支持的单冠的可行、美学质量评估:有效性和可靠性分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Apr;23(4):453-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02162.x. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
7
A dental esthetic checklist for treatment planning in esthetic dentistry.一份用于美容牙科治疗计划的牙齿美学检查表。
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010 Oct;31(8):630-4, 636, 638.
8
Self-reported problems before and after prosthodontic treatments according to newly created Turkish version of oral health impact profile.根据新创建的土耳其版口腔健康影响量表,报告的义齿修复治疗前后的问题。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011 Sep-Oct;53(2):e99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
9
Development of an illustrated index of tooth appearance-perception-based quantification of tooth discolouration and surface defects.基于牙齿外观感知的牙齿变色和表面缺陷量化的图示索引的制定。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2010 Jul;20(4):293-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2010.01053.x.
10
Professional and patient-based evaluation of oral rehabilitation in patients with tooth agenesis.对牙齿发育不全患者进行基于专业和患者的口腔修复评估。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jul;20(7):729-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01698.x.