Unité des soins intensifs de cardiologie, centre hémodynamique, clinique de cardiologie, hôpital cardiologique, centre hospitalier régional et universitaire de Lille, boulevard du Pr-Jules-Leclercq, 59037 Lille cedex, France.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Nov;106(11):593-600. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2013.06.050. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
Large interindividual variability exists in clopidogrel response. Clopidogrel low response correlates with poor prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. Some authors also suggest intraindividual variability over time.
To assess the impact of initial clinical presentation on clopidogrel low response.
In this prospective study, clopidogrel response was assessed in 100 patients. Fifty patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS group) were compared with 50 patients with stable coronary artery disease matched 1:1 for age, sex, body mass index and diabetes (stable group). All patients were tested 18-24h after a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel using the VerifyNow-P2Y12 test (results expressed as platelet reaction units [PRUs]). Patients under chronic clopidogrel therapy or treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, bivalirudin or thrombolytics were excluded.
Mean age was 61 ± 12 years in each group; 28% of patients in each group were diabetic; mean body mass index was 27.6 ± 5.6 kg/m(2) in the ACS group and 27.9 ± 5.9 kg/m(2) in the stable group (p=0.80). Mean PRU values were 197 ± 81 in the ACS group and 159 ± 94 in the stable group (p=0.03). By multivariable analysis, the ACS group was significantly associated with a higher PRU value (p=0.02). There were significantly more clopidogrel low responders (PRU value>230) in the ACS group (38% vs. 18%; p=0.04).
Our study confirms that initial clinical presentation, especially ACS, is a strong predictor of clopidogrel low response; this suggests that the evolution of coronary artery disease for one patient influences the clopidogrel response over time. These results are in accordance with recent trials showing a benefit for more aggressive antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients.
氯吡格雷反应存在较大的个体间变异性。氯吡格雷低反应与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的不良预后相关。一些作者还认为随着时间的推移会出现个体内变异性。
评估初始临床表现对氯吡格雷低反应的影响。
在这项前瞻性研究中,评估了 100 例患者的氯吡格雷反应。50 例急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS 组)患者与 50 例稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者进行比较,年龄、性别、体重指数和糖尿病匹配 1:1(稳定组)。所有患者在服用氯吡格雷 600mg 负荷剂量后 18-24 小时内使用 VerifyNow-P2Y12 试验进行检测(结果以血小板反应单位 [PRU] 表示)。排除接受慢性氯吡格雷治疗或接受糖蛋白 IIb/IIIa 抑制剂、比伐卢定或溶栓治疗的患者。
两组患者的平均年龄均为 61 ± 12 岁;每组各有 28%的患者患有糖尿病;ACS 组的平均体重指数为 27.6 ± 5.6kg/m2,稳定组为 27.9 ± 5.9kg/m2(p=0.80)。ACS 组的平均 PRU 值为 197 ± 81,稳定组为 159 ± 94(p=0.03)。多变量分析显示,ACS 组与较高的 PRU 值显著相关(p=0.02)。ACS 组氯吡格雷低反应者(PRU 值>230)明显多于稳定组(38%比 18%;p=0.04)。
本研究证实,初始临床表现,特别是 ACS,是氯吡格雷低反应的一个强有力的预测因素;这表明一个患者的冠状动脉疾病演变会随着时间的推移影响氯吡格雷的反应。这些结果与最近的试验结果一致,该试验表明在 ACS 患者中更积极的抗血小板治疗有获益。