Suppr超能文献

神经超声评分在区分慢性与急性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病中的应用

Nerve ultrasound score in distinguishing chronic from acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

作者信息

Kerasnoudis A, Pitarokoili K, Behrendt V, Gold R, Yoon M-S

机构信息

Department of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University of Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Mar;125(3):635-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Sep 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the applicability of an ultrasound score (Bochum ultrasound score - BUS) in distinguishing chronic (CIDP) from acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP).

METHODS

Step 1: For the development of BUS 75 healthy-controls, 20 CIDP, 20 AIDP patients underwent US 4.55 ± 3.5 and 3.4 ± 2.91 years, respectively after onset. After comparing the distribution pattern and frequency of pathological US changes between the two study groups, we developed BUS, summarizing the cross sectional area (CSA) of: (1) the ulnar nerve in Guyons' canal, (2) the ulnar nerve in upper-arm, (3) the radial nerve in spiral groove, (4) the sural nerve between the gastrocnemius muscle. Step 2: The BUS underwent blinded evaluation in further 10 CIDP, 21 AIDP patients 3.8 ± 2.7 and 2.3 ± 1.5 years, respectively after onset. Step 3: The BUS underwent blinded, prospective evaluation in 8 patients with acute/subacute polyradiculoneuropathy (5 CIDP, 3 AIDP) 2.6 ± 1.8 weeks after onset.

RESULTS

The BUS showed a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 90.4% (positive predictive value, PPV=81.8%; negative predictive value, NPV=95%) in distinguishing CIDP from AIDP, when they showed no differences in disease duration (p=0.0551).In addition, the BUS distinguished subacute-CIDP from AIDP with a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 100% (PPV=100%, NPV=75%).

CONCLUSION

The BUS seems to allow a reliable distinction of CIDP from AIDP.

SIGNIFICANCE

The BUS may be helpful in distinguishing subacute-CIDP from AIDP.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发并评估一种超声评分(波鸿超声评分 - BUS)在区分慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病(CIDP)与急性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病(AIDP)方面的适用性。

方法

步骤1:为开发BUS,75名健康对照者、20名CIDP患者和20名AIDP患者在发病后分别于4.55±3.5年和3.4±2.91年接受了超声检查。在比较两个研究组之间病理性超声改变的分布模式和频率后,我们开发了BUS,总结了以下部位的横截面积(CSA):(1)Guyon管内的尺神经;(2)上臂的尺神经;(3)螺旋沟内的桡神经;(4)腓肠肌之间的腓肠神经。步骤2:对另外10名CIDP患者和21名AIDP患者在发病后分别于3.8±2.7年和2.3±1.5年进行了BUS的盲法评估。步骤3:对8例急性/亚急性多发性神经根神经病患者(5例CIDP,3例AIDP)在发病后2.6±1.8周进行了BUS的盲法前瞻性评估。

结果

当CIDP和AIDP在病程上无差异时(p = 0.0551),BUS在区分CIDP与AIDP方面显示出90%的敏感性和90.4%的特异性(阳性预测值,PPV = 81.8%;阴性预测值,NPV = 95%)。此外,BUS区分亚急性CIDP与AIDP的敏感性为80%,特异性为100%(PPV = 100%,NPV = 75%)。

结论

BUS似乎能够可靠地区分CIDP与AIDP。

意义

BUS可能有助于区分亚急性CIDP与AIDP。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验