Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
Ophthalmology. 2014 Jan;121(1):423-428. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
To examine whether there is an association between scholarly impact, as measured by the h-index, academic rank, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) awards in academic ophthalmology.
Retrospective analysis of NIH RePORTER and Scopus databases.
Not applicable.
Five hundred seventy-three NIH awards to 391 primary investigators (PIs) in ophthalmology departments were examined. Grant recipients were organized by academic rank, obtained from online listings, and h-index, calculated using the Scopus database. Non-NIH-funded faculty from 20 randomly chosen academic ophthalmology departments also were organized by rank and h-index for comparison with their NIH-funded colleagues.
Scholarly impact, as measured by the h-index, and NIH funding.
The h-index increased with successive academic rank among non-NIH-funded and NIH-funded faculty, as did NIH funding among the latter group. The NIH-funded faculty had higher scholarly impact, as measured by the h-index, than their non-NIH-funded PIs (h = 18.3 vs. 7.8; P <0.0001), even when considering publications only in the prior 5 years; h-index increased with increasing NIH funding ranges. The h-indices of those holding an MD degree (21.4±1.6 standard error of mean) were not statistically higher than those of PhD holders (17.9±0.6) and those with both an MD and PhD degree (18.1±1.7; P = 0.14).
The h-index increases with increasing academic rank among NIH-funded and non-NIH-funded faculty in ophthalmology departments. This bibliometric is associated strongly with NIH funding because NIH-funded PIs had higher scholarly impact than their non-NIH-funded colleagues, and increasing impact was noted with higher funding. The h-index is an objective and easily calculable measure that may be valuable as an adjunct in assessing research productivity, a significant factor for academic promotion in academic ophthalmology.
考察学术影响(以 h 指数衡量)、学术职称和美国国立卫生研究院 (NIH) 奖在学术眼科领域的相关性。
对 NIH RePORTER 和 Scopus 数据库进行回顾性分析。
不适用。
检查了 391 名眼科系主要研究者(PI)的 573 项 NIH 拨款。从在线列表中获得赠款获得者的学术职称,并使用 Scopus 数据库计算 h 指数。还按职称和 h 指数组织了 20 个随机选择的学术眼科系的非 NIH 资助教员,与 NIH 资助的同事进行比较。
用 h 指数衡量的学术影响力和 NIH 资助。
非 NIH 资助和 NIH 资助的教员的 h 指数随着学术职称的提高而提高,后者 NIH 资助也随之增加。与非 NIH 资助的 PI 相比, NIH 资助的教员具有更高的学术影响力(h 指数分别为 18.3 和 7.8;P<0.0001),即使考虑到仅在过去 5 年发表的论文也是如此;h 指数随 NIH 资助范围的增加而增加。拥有 MD 学位的人的 h 指数(21.4±1.6 标准误差均值)与拥有 PhD 的人的 h 指数(17.9±0.6)和同时拥有 MD 和 PhD 的人的 h 指数(18.1±1.7)没有统计学差异(P=0.14)。
在眼科系 NIH 资助和非 NIH 资助的教员中,h 指数随着学术职称的提高而增加。这种生物计量学与 NIH 资助密切相关,因为 NIH 资助的 PI 比非 NIH 资助的同事具有更高的学术影响力,并且随着资助的增加,影响力也在增加。h 指数是一种客观且易于计算的衡量标准,可能作为评估研究生产力的辅助手段很有价值,而研究生产力是学术眼科晋升的重要因素。