Trikha Rishi, Olson Thomas E, Chaudry Ameen, Ishmael Chad R, Villalpando Cristina, Chen Clark J, Hori Kellyn R, Bernthal Nicholas M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90404, United States.
World J Orthop. 2022 Feb 18;13(2):201-211. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i2.201.
Assessing academic productivity allows academic departments to identify the strengths of their scholarly contribution and provides an opportunity to evaluate areas for improvement.
To provide objective benchmarks for departments seeking to enhance academic productivity and identify those with significant improvement in recent past.
Our study retrospectively analyzed a cohort of orthopaedic faculty at United States-based academic orthopaedic programs. 5502 full-time orthopaedic faculty representing 178 programs were included in analysis. Variables included for analysis were National Institutes of Health funding (2014-2018), leadership positions in orthopaedic societies (2018), editorial board positions of top orthopaedic journals (2018), total number of publications and Hirsch-index. A weighted algorithm was used to calculate a cumulative score for each academic program. This study was performed at a large, United States medical school.
All 178 programs included in analysis were evaluated using the comprehensive weighted algorithm. The five institutions with the highest cumulative score, in decreasing order, were: Washington University in St. Louis, the Hospital for Special Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College (SKMC) at Thomas Jefferson University, the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)/Brigham and Women's/Harvard. The five institutions with the highest score capita, in decreasing order, were: Mayo Clinic (Rochester), Washington University in St. Louis, Rush University, Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) and MGH/Brigham and Women's/Harvard. The five academic programs that had the largest improvement in cumulative score from 2013 to 2018, in decreasing order, were: VCU, SKMC at Thomas Jefferson University, UCSF, MGH/Brigham and Women's/Harvard, and Brown University.
This algorithm can provide orthopaedic departments a means to assess academic productivity, monitor progress, and identify areas for improvement as they seek to expand their academic contributions to the orthopaedic community.
评估学术产出有助于学术部门明确其学术贡献的优势,并提供一个评估改进领域的机会。
为寻求提高学术产出的部门提供客观基准,并识别近期有显著进步的部门。
我们的研究回顾性分析了美国学术性骨科项目中的一批骨科教员。分析纳入了代表178个项目的5502名全职骨科教员。分析的变量包括美国国立卫生研究院的资助(2014 - 2018年)、骨科协会的领导职位(2018年)、顶级骨科期刊的编辑委员会职位(2018年)、出版物总数和赫希指数。使用加权算法计算每个学术项目的累积分数。本研究在美国一所大型医学院进行。
分析中纳入的所有178个项目均使用综合加权算法进行评估。累积分数最高的五个机构,按降序排列为:圣路易斯华盛顿大学、特种外科医院、托马斯·杰斐逊大学西德尼·金梅尔医学院(SKMC)、加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校(UCSF)和马萨诸塞州总医院(MGH)/布莱根妇女医院/哈佛。人均分数最高的五个机构,按降序排列为:梅奥诊所(罗切斯特)、圣路易斯华盛顿大学、拉什大学、弗吉尼亚联邦大学(VCU)和MGH/布莱根妇女医院/哈佛。2013年至2018年累积分数提高幅度最大的五个学术项目,按降序排列为:VCU、托马斯·杰斐逊大学的SKMC、UCSF、MGH/布莱根妇女医院/哈佛和布朗大学。
该算法可为骨科部门提供一种手段,在它们寻求扩大对骨科领域的学术贡献时,评估学术产出、监测进展并识别改进领域。