• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲的健康相关社会排斥:福利慷慨程度的多层次研究。

Health related social exclusion in Europe: a multilevel study of the role of welfare generosity.

机构信息

Department of Social Work, Child Welfare and Social Policy, Faculty of Social Sciences, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Post Box 4, St Olavs Plass N-0130 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2013 Sep 28;12:81. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-81.

DOI:10.1186/1475-9276-12-81
PMID:24073744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3850100/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this paper was to investigate the association between health, social position, social participation and the welfare state. Extending recent research on the social consequences of poor health, we asked whether and how welfare generosity is related to the risk of social exclusion associated with combinations of poor health, low education and economic inactivity.

METHODS

Our analyses are based on data from the European Social Survey, round 3 (2006/7), comprising between 21,205 and 21,397 individuals, aged 25-59 years, within 21 European welfare states. The analyses were conducted by means of multilevel logistic regression analysis in STATA 12.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated that the risk of non-participation in social networks decreased as welfare generosity increased. The risk of social exclusion, i.e. non-participation in social networks among disadvantaged groups, seldom differed from the overall association, and in absolute terms it was invariably smaller in more generous welfare state contexts.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that there were no indications of higher levels of non-participation among disadvantaged groups in more generous welfare states. On the contrary, resources made available by the welfare state seemed to matter to all individuals in terms of overall lower levels of non-participation. As such, these results demonstrate the importance of linking health related social exclusion to the social policy context.

摘要

简介

本文旨在探讨健康、社会地位、社会参与和福利国家之间的关系。扩展了最近关于健康不佳的社会后果的研究,我们询问了福利的慷慨程度是否以及如何与与健康状况不佳、教育程度低和经济不活跃相结合相关的社会排斥风险有关。

方法

我们的分析基于欧洲社会调查第三轮(2006/7 年)的数据,该数据涵盖了 21 个欧洲福利国家的 21,205 至 21,397 名 25-59 岁的个体。分析是在 STATA 12 中通过多层次逻辑回归分析进行的。

结果

结果表明,随着福利慷慨程度的增加,参与社交网络的风险降低。社会排斥的风险(即弱势群体中不参与社交网络)很少与总体关联不同,而且在更慷慨的福利国家背景下,其绝对值始终较小。

结论

结果表明,在更慷慨的福利国家中,弱势群体的参与度并没有更高的迹象。相反,福利国家提供的资源似乎对所有个体都具有总体较低的不参与度至关重要。因此,这些结果表明将与健康相关的社会排斥与社会政策背景联系起来的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710e/3850100/3f376dacf20f/1475-9276-12-81-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710e/3850100/3f376dacf20f/1475-9276-12-81-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710e/3850100/3f376dacf20f/1475-9276-12-81-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Health related social exclusion in Europe: a multilevel study of the role of welfare generosity.欧洲的健康相关社会排斥:福利慷慨程度的多层次研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2013 Sep 28;12:81. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-81.
2
Educational inequalities in health in European welfare states: a social expenditure approach.欧洲福利国家的健康方面的教育不平等:社会支出方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Mar;81:60-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.12.010. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
3
Welfare state regimes and income-related health inequalities: a comparison of 23 European countries.福利国家体制与收入相关的健康不平等:23个欧洲国家的比较
Eur J Public Health. 2008 Dec;18(6):593-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckn092. Epub 2008 Oct 16.
4
The role of welfare state principles and generosity in social policy programmes for public health: an international comparative study.福利国家原则与慷慨程度在公共卫生社会政策项目中的作用:一项国际比较研究。
Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1633-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61686-4.
5
Welfare regimes modify the association of disadvantaged adult-life socioeconomic circumstances with self-rated health in old age.福利制度会改变劣势成年人生活的社会经济环境与老年自评健康之间的关联。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 1;48(4):1352-1366. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy283.
6
High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous.高度的经济不平等会导致高收入个体变得不那么慷慨。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 29;112(52):15838-43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1511536112. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
7
Measures that increase social equality are effective in improving life satisfaction in times of economic crisis.在经济危机时期,增加社会平等的措施能有效提高生活满意度。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):1233. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6076-3.
8
Socioeconomic hierarchy and health gradient in Europe: the role of income inequality and of social origins.欧洲的社会经济等级制度与健康梯度:收入不平等和社会出身的作用。
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Nov 14;14:132. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0263-y.
9
Does social policy moderate the impact of unemployment on health? A multilevel analysis of 23 welfare states.社会政策会缓和失业对健康的影响吗?对23个福利国家的多层次分析。
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Dec;26(6):1017-1022. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw050. Epub 2016 Apr 9.
10
Social inequalities in "sickness": does welfare state regime type make a difference? A multilevel analysis of men and women in 26 European countries.社会不平等与“疾病”:福利国家体制类型有影响吗?对 26 个欧洲国家的男性和女性的多层次分析。
Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(2):235-55. doi: 10.2190/HS.42.2.f.

引用本文的文献

1
The prevalence of loneliness across 113 countries: systematic review and meta-analysis.孤独感在 113 个国家的流行情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2022 Feb 9;376:e067068. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067068.
2
Material deprivation and health: a longitudinal study.物质匮乏与健康:一项纵向研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 8;16:747. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3327-z.
3
Individual-level changes in self-rated health before and during the economic crisis in Europe.欧洲经济危机之前及期间个人自评健康状况的变化。

本文引用的文献

1
Educational inequalities in health in European welfare states: a social expenditure approach.欧洲福利国家的健康方面的教育不平等:社会支出方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Mar;81:60-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.12.010. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
2
Social inequalities in "sickness": does welfare state regime type make a difference? A multilevel analysis of men and women in 26 European countries.社会不平等与“疾病”:福利国家体制类型有影响吗?对 26 个欧洲国家的男性和女性的多层次分析。
Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(2):235-55. doi: 10.2190/HS.42.2.f.
3
Social inequalities in 'sickness': European welfare states and non-employment among the chronically ill.
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Jan 5;15:1. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0290-8.
社会不平等与“疾病”:欧洲福利国家与慢性病人的非就业问题。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Dec;73(11):1608-17. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.012. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
4
How do macro-level contexts and policies affect the employment chances of chronically ill and disabled people? Part II: The impact of active and passive labor market policies.宏观层面的环境和政策如何影响慢性病和残疾人的就业机会?第二部分:积极和被动劳动力市场政策的影响。
Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(3):415-30. doi: 10.2190/HS.41.3.b.
5
How do macro-level contexts and policies affect the employment chances of chronically ill and disabled people? Part I: The impact of recession and deindustrialization.宏观层面的环境和政策如何影响慢性病和残疾人的就业机会?第一部分:经济衰退和去工业化的影响。
Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(3):395-413. doi: 10.2190/HS.41.3.a.
6
The future of the welfare state: crisis myths and crisis realities.
Int J Health Serv. 2002;32(2):255-77. doi: 10.2190/GJ9M-WUGX-DMJ2-35PA.
7
Class differences in the social consequences of illness?疾病社会后果中的阶级差异?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Mar;56(3):188-92. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.3.188.
8
Does chronic illness cause adverse social and economic consequences among Swedes?慢性病会给瑞典人带来不良的社会和经济后果吗?
Scand J Public Health. 2001 Mar;29(1):63-70. doi: 10.1177/14034948010290011201.
9
Inequality in the social consequences of illness: how well do people with long-term illness fare in the British and Swedish labor markets?疾病社会后果中的不平等:慢性病患者在英国和瑞典劳动力市场中的表现如何?
Int J Health Serv. 2000;30(3):435-51. doi: 10.2190/6PP1-TDEQ-H44D-4LJQ.