Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali, Knowledge City, Sector 81, SAS Nagar, PO Manauli, Mohali 140306, Punjab, India.
BMC Evol Biol. 2013 Sep 28;13:212. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-212.
Interlocus conflict predicts (a) evolution of traits, beneficial to males but detrimental to females and (b) evolution of aging and life-span under the influence of the cost of bearing these traits. However, there are very few empirical investigations shedding light on these predictions. Those that do address these issues, mostly reported response of male reproductive traits or the lack of it and do not address the life-history consequence of such evolution. Here, we test both the above mentioned predictions using experimental evolution on replicate populations of Drosophila melanogaster. We present responses observed after >45 generations of altered levels of interlocus conflict (generated by varying the operational sex ratio).
Males from the male biased (high conflict, M-regime) regime evolved higher spontaneous locomotor activity and courtship frequency. Females exposed to these males were found to have higher mortality rate. Males from the female biased regime (low conflict, F-regime) did not evolve altered courtship frequency and activity. However, progeny production of females continuously exposed to F-males was significantly higher than the progeny production of females exposed to M-males indicating that the F-males are relatively benign towards their mates. We found that males from male biased regime lived shorter compared to males from the female biased regime.
F-males (evolving under lower levels of sexual conflict) evolved decreased mate harming ability indicating the cost of maintenance of the suit of traits that cause mate-harm. The M-males (evolving under higher levels sexual conflict) caused higher female mortality indicating that they had evolved increased mate harming ability, possibly as a by product of increased reproduction related activity. There was a correlated evolution of life-history of the M and F-males. M-regime males lived shorter compared to the males from F-regime, possibly due to the cost of investing more in reproductive traits. In combination, these results suggest that male reproductive traits and life-history traits can evolve in response to the altered levels of interlocus sexual conflict.
基因座间冲突预测(a)有利于雄性但不利于雌性的特征进化,以及(b)在承受这些特征的代价的影响下,衰老和寿命的进化。然而,很少有实证研究能揭示这些预测。那些确实解决了这些问题的研究,大多报告了雄性生殖特征的反应或缺乏反应,而没有解决这种进化的生命史后果。在这里,我们使用黑腹果蝇的重复种群进行实验进化,来检验上述两个预测。我们展示了在改变基因座间冲突水平(通过改变操作性别比例)超过 45 代后的观察到的反应。
来自雄性偏向(高冲突,M 型)的雄性个体进化出更高的自发活动和求偶频率。暴露于这些雄性个体的雌性个体的死亡率更高。来自雌性偏向的雄性个体(低冲突,F 型)没有进化出改变的求偶频率和活动。然而,连续暴露于 F 型雄性的雌性个体的后代产生量明显高于暴露于 M 型雄性的雌性个体的后代产生量,表明 F 型雄性对其配偶相对无害。我们发现,来自雄性偏向型的雄性个体的寿命比来自雌性偏向型的雄性个体的寿命短。
F 型雄性(在较低水平的性冲突下进化)进化出降低了的配偶伤害能力,表明维持导致配偶伤害的特征套装的成本。M 型雄性(在较高水平的性冲突下进化)导致了更高的雌性死亡率,表明它们进化出了更强的配偶伤害能力,可能是由于与繁殖相关的活动增加的副产品。M 和 F 型雄性的生命史也存在相关进化。与来自 F 型的雄性相比,M 型雄性的寿命较短,这可能是由于投资更多繁殖特征的代价。总的来说,这些结果表明,雄性生殖特征和生命史特征可以响应改变的基因座间性冲突水平而进化。