a Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego , CA , USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2013;35(9):926-33. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2013.838940. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
Few studies have examined instrumental activities of daily living (iADLs) in nondemented Parkinson's disease (PD), and the majority of these studies have used report-based measures, which can have limited validity. The present study had two main goals: (a) to examine the performance of nondemented PD patients on two performance-based measures of iADLs, which are considered more objective functional measures, and (b) to examine the cognitive, motor, and psychiatric correlates of iADL impairment in PD. Ninety-eight nondemented PD patients and 47 healthy older adults were administered performance-based measures that assess the ability to manage medications (Medication Management Ability Assessment) and finances (University of California, San Diego, UCSD, Performance-based Skills Assessment), the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale to assess global cognitive functioning, the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III to assess motor symptom severity, and the Geriatric Depression Scale to assess depressive symptoms. Nondemented PD patients demonstrated significantly impaired scores relative to the healthy comparison group on the performance-based measure of financial management, but there were no significant group differences in medication management. Global cognitive functioning, motor severity, and depressive symptoms did not correlate with scores on either of the functional measures, except for a small correlation between depressive symptoms and financial management. The two performance-based measures of iADL functioning did not correlate with one another. These findings suggest that medication and financial management may not be predicted based on global cognitive functioning and that iADLs may not be represented by a single construct. Furthermore, these findings suggest the potential need for a multidimensional approach to assessing iADLs.
很少有研究调查非痴呆型帕金森病(PD)患者的工具性日常生活活动(iADLs),而且这些研究大多使用基于报告的测量方法,这些方法的有效性可能有限。本研究有两个主要目标:(a)考察非痴呆型 PD 患者在两项基于表现的 iADL 测量中的表现,这些测量被认为是更客观的功能测量;(b)考察认知、运动和精神病学因素与 PD 患者 iADL 障碍的关系。98 名非痴呆型 PD 患者和 47 名健康老年人接受了基于表现的测量,这些测量评估了管理药物(药物管理能力评估)和财务(加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校,UCSD,基于表现的技能评估)的能力、评估整体认知功能的 Mattis 痴呆评定量表、评估运动症状严重程度的统一帕金森病评定量表第三部分以及评估抑郁症状的老年抑郁量表。与健康对照组相比,非痴呆型 PD 患者在财务管理的基于表现的测量中表现出显著受损的分数,但在药物管理方面没有显著的组间差异。整体认知功能、运动严重程度和抑郁症状与任何一项功能测量的得分均无相关性,除了抑郁症状与财务管理之间存在较小的相关性。两项 iADL 功能的基于表现的测量彼此之间没有相关性。这些发现表明,药物和财务管理可能不能基于整体认知功能来预测,并且 iADLs 可能不是由单一结构来代表。此外,这些发现表明需要采用多维方法来评估 iADLs。