• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护病房成年患者住院死亡率的风险预测:澳大利亚和新西兰死亡风险模型的建立和验证。

Risk prediction of hospital mortality for adult patients admitted to Australian and New Zealand intensive care units: development and validation of the Australian and New Zealand Risk of Death model.

机构信息

Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2013 Dec;28(6):935-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.07.058. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.07.058
PMID:24074958
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a new mortality prediction model (Australian and New Zealand Risk of Death [ANZROD]) for Australian and New Zealand intensive care units (ICUs) and compare its performance with the existing Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III-j.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All ICU admissions from 2004 to 2009 were extracted from the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database. Hospital mortality was modeled using logistic regression with training (two third) and validation (one third) data sets. Predictor variables included APACHE III score components, source of admission to ICU and hospital, lead time, elective surgery, treatment limitation, ventilation status, and APACHE III diagnoses. Model performance was assessed by standardized mortality ratio, Hosmer-Lemeshow C and H statistics, Brier score, Cox calibration regression, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and calibration curves.

RESULTS

There were 456605 patients available for model development and validation. Observed mortality was 11.3%. Performance measures (standardized mortality ratio, Hosmer-Lemeshow C and H statistics, and receiver operating characteristic curve) for the ANZROD and APACHE III-j model in the validation data set were 1.01, 104.9 and 111.4, and 0.902; 0.84, 1596.6 and 2087.3, and 0.885, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ANZROD has better calibration; discrimination compared with the APACHE III-j. Further research is required to validate performance over time and in specific subgroups of ICU population.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在为澳大利亚和新西兰的重症监护病房(ICU)开发和验证一种新的死亡率预测模型(澳大利亚和新西兰死亡风险[ANZROD]),并将其与现有的急性生理学和慢性健康评估(APACHE)III-j 进行比较。

材料和方法

从澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护学会成人患者数据库中提取 2004 年至 2009 年所有 ICU 入院患者。使用逻辑回归对住院死亡率进行建模,使用训练(三分之二)和验证(三分之一)数据集。预测变量包括 APACHE III 评分成分、入住 ICU 和医院的来源、领先时间、择期手术、治疗限制、通气状态和 APACHE III 诊断。通过标准化死亡率、Hosmer-Lemeshow C 和 H 统计、Brier 评分、Cox 校准回归、接收者操作特征曲线下面积和校准曲线来评估模型性能。

结果

有 456605 例患者可用于模型开发和验证。观察到的死亡率为 11.3%。验证数据集中 ANZROD 和 APACHE III-j 模型的性能指标(标准化死亡率、Hosmer-Lemeshow C 和 H 统计、接收者操作特征曲线)分别为 1.01、104.9 和 111.4、0.902;0.84、1596.6 和 2087.3、0.885。

结论

与 APACHE III-j 相比,ANZROD 的校准和区分能力更好。需要进一步研究以验证其在不同时间和特定 ICU 人群亚组中的性能。

相似文献

1
Risk prediction of hospital mortality for adult patients admitted to Australian and New Zealand intensive care units: development and validation of the Australian and New Zealand Risk of Death model.澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护病房成年患者住院死亡率的风险预测:澳大利亚和新西兰死亡风险模型的建立和验证。
J Crit Care. 2013 Dec;28(6):935-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.07.058. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
2
Mortality and length-of-stay outcomes, 1993-2003, in the binational Australian and New Zealand intensive care adult patient database.1993年至2003年,澳大利亚和新西兰成人重症监护患者双边数据库中的死亡率和住院时间结果。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):46-61. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000295313.08084.58.
3
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)IV:当今危重症患者的医院死亡率评估
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1297-310. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215112.84523.F0.
4
Performance of APACHE III over time in Australia and New Zealand: a retrospective cohort study.澳大利亚和新西兰不同时期急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统III(APACHE III)的表现:一项回顾性队列研究。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012 Nov;40(6):980-94. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1204000609.
5
The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation III outcome prediction in patients admitted to the intensive care unit after pneumonectomy.肺切除术后入住重症监护病房患者的急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估III结局预测
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Dec;21(6):832-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
6
Assessing contemporary intensive care unit outcome: development and validation of the Australian and New Zealand Risk of Death admission model.评估当代重症监护病房的结局:澳大利亚和新西兰死亡风险入院模型的开发与验证
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2017 May;45(3):326-343. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1704500308.
7
Performance evaluation of APACHE II score for an Indian patient with respiratory problems.用于评估印度呼吸疾病患者的急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)的性能评价
Indian J Med Res. 2004 Jun;119(6):273-82.
8
Comparison of the Mortality Probability Admission Model III, National Quality Forum, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV hospital mortality models: implications for national benchmarking*.入院死亡率模型 III、国家质量论坛和急性生理学与慢性健康评估 IV 医院死亡率模型的比较:对国家基准测试的影响*。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):544-53. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a66a49.
9
Illness severity scoring for Intensive Care at Middlemore Hospital, New Zealand: past and future.新西兰米德尔莫尔医院重症监护的疾病严重程度评分:过去与未来。
N Z Med J. 2010 Jun 11;123(1316):47-65.
10
The ANZROD model: better benchmarking of ICU outcomes and detection of outliers.ANZROD模型:对重症监护病房(ICU)结果进行更好的基准测试及异常值检测。
Crit Care Resusc. 2016 Mar;18(1):25-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of low-dose ketamine with hallucinations in critically ill patients: a target trial emulation.低剂量氯胺酮与危重症患者幻觉的关联:一项目标试验模拟研究
Intensive Care Med. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07926-w.
2
A target trial emulation of dexmedetomidine to treat agitation in the intensive care unit.右美托咪定用于治疗重症监护病房躁动的目标试验模拟
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Mar 24;37:e20250010. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250010. eCollection 2025.
3
Hallucinations and disturbed behaviour in the critically ill: incidence, patient characteristics, associations, trajectory, and outcomes.
危重症患者的幻觉与行为紊乱:发生率、患者特征、关联因素、病程及结局
Crit Care. 2025 Jan 31;29(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05290-1.
4
Early prediction of mortality upon intensive care unit admission.重症监护病房入院时死亡率的早期预测。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02807-6.
5
The Predictive Validity of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness Score Compared to the Glasgow Coma Scale in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.重症监护病房中无反应性评分总纲与格拉斯哥昏迷量表相比的预测效度:一项系统评价
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Nov 5. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02150-8.
6
The Impact of Prescription Time Limits on Phosphate Administration in the Intensive Care Unit: A Before-After Quality Improvement Study.处方时间限制对重症监护病房磷酸盐给药的影响:一项前后对比的质量改进研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 5;12(15):1549. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12151549.
7
Outcomes for Pacific and European patients admitted to New Zealand intensive care units from 2009 to 2018.2009年至2018年期间入住新西兰重症监护病房的太平洋地区和欧洲患者的治疗结果。
Crit Care Resusc. 2024 Jun 20;26(2):100-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.04.002. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
ISARIC-4C Mortality Score overestimates risk of death due to COVID-19 in Australian ICU patients: a validation cohort study.ISARIC-4C死亡率评分高估了澳大利亚重症监护病房患者因新冠肺炎死亡的风险:一项验证队列研究。
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Oct 18;23(4):403-413. doi: 10.51893/2021.4.OA5. eCollection 2021 Dec 6.
9
Natural language processing to assess the epidemiology of delirium-suggestive behavioural disturbances in critically ill patients.利用自然语言处理评估重症患者中谵妄相关行为障碍的流行病学情况。
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Oct 18;23(2):144-153. doi: 10.51893/2021.2.oa1. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
The Long-Term Impact of Frailty After an Intensive Care Unit Admission Due to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病导致入住重症监护病房后衰弱的长期影响
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2024 Jan 25;11(1):83-94. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0453.