• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经 David V 治疗后,严重主动脉瓣关闭不全患者的左心室功能和重构得到改善。

Improved left ventricular function and remodeling after the david v for significant aortic insufficiency.

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Joseph B. Whitehead Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Dec;96(6):2090-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.056. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.056
PMID:24075486
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Valve-sparing root replacement is controversial in patients with significant aortic insufficiency (AI) because the aortic valve cusps often require repair, which may potentially jeopardize long-term valve function. The purpose of this study was to evaluate valve function and left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients undergoing valve-sparing root replacement in the setting of significant AI.

METHODS

A review of the Emory Aortic Surgery database between 2004 and 2012 identified 616 aortic root replacements. Of these procedures, 169 were performed for patients with 3+ or greater AI. Fifty-one patients (30%) underwent a David V procedure. Echocardiography was used to evaluate the degree of AI, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and left ventricular end-systolic diameter.

RESULTS

The mean echocardiographic follow-up was 18 ± 21 months (range, 1 to 89). Patients undergoing valve-sparing root replacement had an increase in ejection fraction (preoperative 51% ± 7% versus postoperative 57% ± 6%, p < 0.01) and a reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (preoperative 58 ± 8 mm versus postoperative 48 ± 6 mm, p < 0.01) and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (preoperative 40 ± 8 mm versus postoperative 32 ± 6 mm, p < 0.01). During the follow-up period, freedom from greater than 1+ AI was 96%, and freedom from aortic valve replacement was 98%. The addition of cusp repair did not represent a significant risk factor for recurrent postoperative AI (p = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

The David V technique produces significant left ventricular reverse remodeling and improved ventricular function in patients with chronic severe AI. Long-term data and close follow-up will be paramount in evaluating the durability of valve repair in this patient population.

摘要

背景

在严重主动脉瓣关闭不全(AI)患者中,保留瓣膜的根部置换术存在争议,因为主动脉瓣瓣叶通常需要修复,这可能会危及长期的瓣膜功能。本研究的目的是评估在严重 AI 患者中进行保留瓣膜根部置换术时的瓣膜功能和左心室逆重构。

方法

回顾 2004 年至 2012 年期间埃默里主动脉手术数据库,共确定了 616 例主动脉根部置换术。其中,169 例为 3+或更严重 AI 的患者进行。51 例(30%)患者行 David V 手术。超声心动图用于评估 AI 程度、左心室舒张末期直径和左心室收缩末期直径。

结果

平均超声心动图随访时间为 18±21 个月(范围 1-89 个月)。行保留瓣膜根部置换术的患者射血分数增加(术前 51%±7%,术后 57%±6%,p<0.01),左心室舒张末期直径减小(术前 58±8mm,术后 48±6mm,p<0.01),左心室收缩末期直径减小(术前 40±8mm,术后 32±6mm,p<0.01)。在随访期间,大于 1+AI 的无复发率为 96%,主动脉瓣置换的无复发率为 98%。瓣叶修复的增加并不代表术后 AI 复发的显著危险因素(p=0.21)。

结论

David V 技术可使慢性重度 AI 患者的左心室逆重构显著改善,并改善心室功能。长期数据和密切随访对于评估该患者人群中瓣膜修复的耐久性至关重要。

相似文献

1
Improved left ventricular function and remodeling after the david v for significant aortic insufficiency.经 David V 治疗后,严重主动脉瓣关闭不全患者的左心室功能和重构得到改善。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Dec;96(6):2090-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.056. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
2
Aortic valve repair versus replacement for aortic regurgitation: effects on left ventricular remodeling.主动脉瓣反流的主动脉瓣修复与置换:对左心室重构的影响。
J Card Surg. 2015 Jan;30(1):13-9. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12457. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
3
Indexed left ventricular dimensions best predict survival after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve regurgitation.在主动脉瓣反流患者中,左心室大小指数最能预测主动脉瓣置换术后的生存率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Apr;87(4):1170-5; discussion 1175-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.12.086.
4
Florida Sleeve Procedure Is Durable and Improves Aortic Valve Function in Marfan Syndrome Patients.佛罗里达袖状手术效果持久,可改善马凡氏综合征患者的主动脉瓣功能。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Sep;104(3):834-839. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.01.044. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
5
Severity of Preoperative Aortic Regurgitation Does Not Impact Valve Durability of Aortic Valve Repair Following the David V Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement.术前主动脉瓣反流的严重程度不影响David V保留瓣膜主动脉根部置换术后主动脉瓣修复的瓣膜耐久性。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Mar;103(3):756-763. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
6
Evaluation of left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients with severe aortic regurgitation undergoing aortic valve replacement: Comparison between diameters and volumes.严重主动脉瓣反流患者行主动脉瓣置换术后左心室逆向重构的评估:直径与容积的比较
Echocardiography. 2018 Feb;35(2):142-147. doi: 10.1111/echo.13750. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
7
Effects of preoperative aortic insufficiency on outcome after aortic valve-sparing surgery.术前主动脉瓣关闭不全对保留主动脉瓣手术预后的影响。
Circulation. 2009 Sep 15;120(11 Suppl):S120-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.841445.
8
Early regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement by the Ross procedure detected by cine MRI.通过电影磁共振成像检测到Ross手术置换主动脉瓣后左心室肥厚的早期消退。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2004;6(1):1-8. doi: 10.1081/jcmr-120027799.
9
Left ventricle reverse remodeling in chronic aortic regurgitation patients with dilated ventricle after aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后左心室扩张的慢性主动脉瓣反流患者的左心室逆重构。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jan 16;17(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01754-5.
10
Time-related changes in left ventricular function after double valve replacement for combined aortic and mitral regurgitation in a young rheumatic population. Predictors of postoperative left ventricular performance and role of chordal preservation.年轻风湿性心脏病患者联合主动脉瓣和二尖瓣反流行双瓣膜置换术后左心室功能的时间相关变化。术后左心室功能的预测因素及腱索保留的作用。
Circulation. 1997 Feb 18;95(4):899-904. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.4.899.

引用本文的文献

1
Thinking below the surface in valve-sparing aortic root repair: iceberg or smooth waters?保留瓣膜的主动脉根部修复术中的深入思考:冰山还是平静水域?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Sep 2;62(4). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac450.
2
Comparison of outcomes following isolated repair of tricuspid versus bicuspid aortic valves.三尖瓣与二尖瓣主动脉瓣单独修复后的结果比较。
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Jul;12(7):3514-3523. doi: 10.21037/jtd-19-4193.