Bücker Bettina, Redaèlli Marcus, Simic Dusan, Wilm Stefan
Institut für Allgemeinmedizin und Familienmedizin, Fakultät für Gesundheit, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten; Institut für Allgemeinmedizin (ifam), Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013;107(6):410-7. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
Implementation of guidelines in general practice is difficult. Do general practitioners (GPs) reject evidence-based medicine (EBM) in general? Which attitudes do GPs have towards EBM and guidelines, and which value do they attach to EBM in daily routine?
We conducted a qualitative study using five focus groups with 53 GPs. The study was set in the German federal states of Bavaria, Saxony, North Rhine-Westphalia, Hesse and Hamburg. Participants were selected according to area (rural/urban), region (North/South, East/West) and grade of professionalisation. Focus groups were digitally recorded and fully transcribed. Data were analysed in a multidisciplinary team using qualitative content analysis.
Most participants felt positive towards EBM. Lack of feasibility was explicitly mentioned: the participants distinguished between "practised" and "true" EBM. Guidelines are often considered unsuitable for general practice. The GPs felt confident that their treatment of patients was evidence-based.
Compared to older studies, German GPs have an increasingly favourable opinion about EBM. In order to enhance the practical application of EBM and guidelines the attitudes of GPs need to be considered.
在普通医疗实践中实施指南困难重重。全科医生(GP)总体上是否排斥循证医学(EBM)?全科医生对循证医学和指南持何种态度,以及他们在日常工作中对循证医学的重视程度如何?
我们采用焦点小组的方式,对53名全科医生进行了定性研究。研究在德国的巴伐利亚州、萨克森州、北莱茵 - 威斯特法伦州、黑森州和汉堡市进行。参与者根据地区(农村/城市)、区域(北/南、东/西)和专业化程度进行挑选。焦点小组进行了数字录音并全部转录。数据由一个多学科团队使用定性内容分析法进行分析。
大多数参与者对循证医学持积极态度。明确提到缺乏可行性:参与者区分了“实践中的”和“真正的”循证医学。指南通常被认为不适用于普通医疗实践。全科医生对其患者治疗基于证据充满信心。
与早期研究相比,德国全科医生对循证医学的看法越来越积极。为了加强循证医学和指南的实际应用,需要考虑全科医生的态度。