Day Joseph M, Uhl Timothy
University of Kentucky, USA.
Man Ther. 2013 Dec;18(6):588-93. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
The purposes of this study were to establish the reliability for measuring scapular muscle thickness, and to examine how scapular muscle thickness changes with respect to external loads. Participants were asymptomatic subjects recruited from a sample of convenience. Thickness Measures were taken using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) under 11 conditions, rest and 10 progressive loads, for the Lower Trapezius (LT) and Serratus Anterior (SA). The procedures were repeated 1 week later to determine reliability. Bland and Altman limits of agreement and Interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to determine reliability. Separate repeated measure ANOVAs were performed to determine differences in muscle thickness for both muscles across 3 conditions; rest and the 2 loaded conditions that represented the lowest and highest torque values. Results demonstrate good within and between day reliability for the LT (ICC = .86 to .99) and SA (ICC = .88 to .99). For the LT and SA, there were significant differences between the resting thickness and 2 lifting conditions (p ≤ .01) but not between the two lifting conditions. It was concluded that RUSI is reliable in measuring scapular muscle thickness. RUSI is sensitive enough to detect absolute changes in thickness from resting to a contracted state but unable to detect differences between loads imposed on the shoulder.
本研究的目的是确定测量肩胛肌厚度的可靠性,并研究肩胛肌厚度如何随外部负荷而变化。参与者是从便利样本中招募的无症状受试者。使用康复超声成像(RUSI)在11种条件下(休息和10种渐进负荷)测量下斜方肌(LT)和前锯肌(SA)的厚度。1周后重复该程序以确定可靠性。使用布兰德和奥特曼一致性界限以及组内相关系数(ICC)来确定可靠性。进行单独的重复测量方差分析以确定两种肌肉在三种条件下(休息以及代表最低和最高扭矩值的两种负荷条件)的肌肉厚度差异。结果表明,LT(ICC = 0.86至0.99)和SA(ICC = 0.88至0.99)在日内和日间均具有良好的可靠性。对于LT和SA,休息时的厚度与两种举重条件之间存在显著差异(p≤0.01),但两种举重条件之间没有差异。得出的结论是,RUSI在测量肩胛肌厚度方面是可靠的。RUSI足够敏感,能够检测从休息到收缩状态的厚度绝对变化,但无法检测施加在肩部的负荷之间的差异。