• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

右脑损伤患者的启动和统计学习。

Priming and statistical learning in right brain damaged patients.

机构信息

University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L3G1.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2013 Nov;51(13):2526-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.024. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.024
PMID:24075841
Abstract

We investigated how right hemisphere lesions affected location priming and statistical learning in four groups of participants: young controls, older controls, and right brain damaged patients with or without spatial neglect. Using a version of the Maljkovic and Nakayama's (1994) priming task, but with all the targets presented at the mid-line, we biased the transition probability for targets to repeat their spatial location. The decrease in response time with spatial repetition allowed us to quantify priming, and the modulation of priming strength as a function of repeat probability allowed us to assess for statistical learning. Contrary to the healthy controls, right brain damage decreased (but did not abolish) spatial priming. Right brain damaged patients did not modulate the magnitude of the spatial priming effect with variation in repeat frequency, as did the control groups. We conclude that damage to the right hemisphere impairs spatial priming and that priming impairment co-exists with, and may contribute to an inability to learn environmental statistical regularities. Such deficits could contribute to functional deficits and a poorer response to rehabilitation.

摘要

我们研究了右半球损伤如何影响位置启动和统计学习在四组参与者

年轻的对照组,老年对照组,和右脑损伤患者与或没有空间忽视。使用 Maljkovic 和 Nakayama(1994)的启动任务的一个版本,但所有的目标都在中线呈现,我们偏向于目标重复其空间位置的转移概率。随着空间重复的响应时间的减少,我们可以量化启动,并且启动强度随重复概率的调制允许我们评估统计学习。与健康对照组相反,右脑损伤降低了(但没有消除)空间启动。右脑损伤患者没有随着重复频率的变化来调节空间启动效应的幅度,就像对照组一样。我们得出结论,右半球损伤会损害空间启动,而启动损伤与无法学习环境统计规律并存,并可能导致功能障碍和对康复反应较差。这些缺陷可能导致功能障碍和对康复的反应较差。

相似文献

1
Priming and statistical learning in right brain damaged patients.右脑损伤患者的启动和统计学习。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Nov;51(13):2526-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.024. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
2
Spatial probability cuing and right hemisphere damage.空间概率提示与右半球损伤。
Brain Cogn. 2012 Dec;80(3):352-60. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.08.006. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
3
Symmetrical hemispheric priming in spatial neglect: a hyperactive left-hemisphere phenomenon?空间忽略中的双侧半球启动:左半球过度活跃现象?
Cortex. 2012 Apr;48(4):421-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.12.008. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
4
Revisiting previously searched locations in visual neglect: role of right parietal and frontal lesions in misjudging old locations as new.重新审视视觉忽视中先前搜索过的位置:右侧顶叶和额叶病变在将旧位置误判为新位置中的作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Feb;17(2):340-54. doi: 10.1162/0898929053124983.
5
Hemispheric asymmetry in a perceptual priming task: evidence from patients with unilateral brain damage.知觉启动任务中的半球不对称性:来自单侧脑损伤患者的证据。
Percept Mot Skills. 1999 Apr;88(2):457-65. doi: 10.2466/pms.1999.88.2.457.
6
Decision time and response accuracy in a conditional motor learning task are impaired independently in unilateral temporal lobe-resected patients.单侧颞叶切除术后患者在条件性运动学习任务中的决策时间和反应准确性均受损。
Epilepsy Behav. 2012 Mar;23(3):324-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.11.020. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
7
Assessment of spatial attention after brain damage with a dynamic reaction time test.采用动态反应时间测试评估脑损伤后的空间注意力。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005 Oct;11(6):697-707. doi: 10.1017/S1355617705050824.
8
Prismatic adaptation effects on spatial representation of time in neglect patients.忽视症患者时间空间表象的棱晶适应效应。
Cortex. 2013 Jan;49(1):120-30. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.11.010. Epub 2011 Nov 27.
9
Competition between simultaneous stimuli modulated by location probability in hemispatial neglect.半侧空间忽视中由位置概率调制的同时刺激之间的竞争
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(7):1050-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.026. Epub 2005 Dec 5.
10
Time to imagine space: a chronometric exploration of representational neglect.想象空间的时间:对表征忽视的计时探索。
Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(9):1249-57. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.12.013. Epub 2005 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Implicit Selective Attention: The Role of the Mesencephalic-basal Ganglia System.内隐选择性注意:中脑-基底神经节系统的作用。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2024;22(9):1497-1512. doi: 10.2174/1570159X21666230831163052.
2
Habit-like attentional bias is unlike goal-driven attentional bias against spatial updating.习惯样的注意偏向不同于针对空间更新的目标驱动的注意偏向。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Jun 17;7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00404-7.
3
Concurrent Statistical Learning of Ignored and Attended Sound Sequences: An MEG Study.被忽视和被关注声音序列的并发统计学习:一项脑磁图研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Apr 17;13:102. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00102. eCollection 2019.
4
Statistical Learning Impairments as a Consequence of Stroke.中风导致的统计学习障碍
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Aug 28;12:339. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00339. eCollection 2018.
5
Neurophysiological Markers of Statistical Learning in Music and Language: Hierarchy, Entropy, and Uncertainty.音乐与语言中统计学习的神经生理标记:层级、熵与不确定性
Brain Sci. 2018 Jun 19;8(6):114. doi: 10.3390/brainsci8060114.
6
Updating impairments and the failure to explore new hypotheses following right brain damage.右脑损伤后功能障碍的更新以及探索新假设的失败。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jun;236(6):1749-1765. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5259-6. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
7
Habitual versus goal-driven attention.习惯性注意与目标驱动注意。
Cortex. 2018 May;102:107-120. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
8
P300 amplitude variations, prior probabilities, and likelihoods: A Bayesian ERP study.P300波幅变化、先验概率和似然性:一项贝叶斯事件相关电位研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Oct;16(5):911-28. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0442-3.
9
Visual attention modulates the asymmetric influence of each cerebral hemisphere on spatial perception.视觉注意力调节每个大脑半球对空间感知的不对称影响。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 13;6:19190. doi: 10.1038/srep19190.
10
Updating representations of temporal intervals.更新时间间隔的表示形式。
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Dec;233(12):3517-26. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4422-6. Epub 2015 Aug 25.