Suppr超能文献

使用序列和搜索任务的空间记忆中的性别差异。

Sex differences in spatial memory using serial and search tasks.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Leicester, Lancaster Road, Leicester LE1 9HN, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Behav Brain Res. 2013 Nov 15;257:90-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.09.027. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

Abstract

The present study assessed the spatial abilities of male and female human participants using different versions of the non-navigational Corsi block-tapping test (CBT) and a search task. Males performed significantly better than females on the standard manual version of the CBT; however, the standard CBT does not allow discrimination between spatial memory span and the role of spatial organisational factors (structure, path length and presence of crossings) in the sequences to recall. These organisational factors were assessed, therefore, in an experiment in which 7-block-sequences had to be recalled in a computerised version of the CBT. No sex differences in performance were observed on the computerised CBT, indicating that males do not make better use of spatial organisational principles. Accordingly, sex differences observed in the manual CBT are likely to rely upon differences in memory span between males and females. In the search task, participants could locate a goal by reference to a Euclidian space (the geometry of a virtual enclose) or to proximal non-geometric cues. Both male and female participants showed a preference for the non-geometric cues, which overshadowed learning about the geometric cues when the two sets were available simultaneously during the training stage. These results indicate that sex differences do exist in those tests which are dependent on memory span. Sex differences were absent, however, in spatial organisational skills or in the usage of Euclidian and egocentric strategies to solve problems relying on spatial ability.

摘要

本研究使用不同版本的非航海 Corsi 积木测试(CBT)和搜索任务评估了男性和女性人类参与者的空间能力。男性在标准手动版 CBT 上的表现明显优于女性;然而,标准 CBT 无法区分空间记忆广度和空间组织因素(结构、路径长度和交叉点的存在)在回忆序列中的作用。因此,在一项实验中评估了这些组织因素,在该实验中,必须在 CBT 的计算机化版本中回忆 7 个积木序列。在计算机化 CBT 上,性别之间的表现没有差异,这表明男性并没有更好地利用空间组织原则。因此,在手动 CBT 中观察到的性别差异可能依赖于男性和女性之间的记忆广度差异。在搜索任务中,参与者可以通过参考欧几里得空间(虚拟封闭的几何形状)或近端非几何线索来定位目标。男性和女性参与者都表现出对非几何线索的偏好,当两种线索在训练阶段同时可用时,这种偏好掩盖了对几何线索的学习。这些结果表明,在依赖于记忆广度的测试中确实存在性别差异。然而,在空间组织技能或在使用欧几里得和自我中心策略来解决依赖空间能力的问题方面,没有性别差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验