Suppr超能文献

急诊椎体压缩性骨折采用椎体强化术与保守疗法治疗的经济学分析。

Vertebral augmentation versus conservative therapy for emergently admitted vertebral compression deformities: an economic analysis.

机构信息

Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY; Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(5):441-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vertebral augmentation (VA) performed on inpatients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) has been shown to facilitate discharge, decrease analgesic requirements, and improve pain.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to compare the overall cost, length of stay, and readmission data for patients hospitalized with painful osteoporotic VCFs, treated either medically or with inpatient VA.

SETTING

A single academic medical center.

STUDY DESIGN

Economic analysis

METHODS

Patients admitted with VCF over a 30-month period were identified using ICD-9 codes. The total length of stay, hospitalization costs, average daily cost, and 30-day readmission rates were compared between those who underwent VA and those managed nonoperatively. A subgroup analysis was performed with an age matched group of controls as well. Two-tailed t-tests were used for statistical significance.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine inpatients underwent VA; 61 levels were augmented. Their average age was 81.7 years. There were 209 patients who were treated nonoperatively for VCF. Their average age was 72.7 years, a significant age difference from the VA group (P < 0.01). The VA patients' average length of stay was 13.8 days, compared to 8.1 days in the medically managed group (P < 0.01). Average total costs were $26,074 in the VA group and $15,507 in the medically managed group (P < 0.01). The daily costs of admission were $2,040 in the VA group and $2,069 in the medically managed group (P = 0.85). The readmission rates related to VCF were 0% in the VA group; 5.2% in the medically managed group; and 7.7% in the age-matched control group. Of those who underwent VA, 43% experienced delays in care related to anticoagulation or medical comorbidities.

LIMITATIONS

The study is retrospective and uses billing data as a marker for total cost of care, The study does not account for cost differences between vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.

CONCLUSION

Inpatient VA can be cost effective as demonstrated by the same daily cost between the VA and medically managed groups. Early identification and consultation can facilitate VA and rapid discharge. Anticoagulation issues and medical comorbidities can delay VA and lengthen hospital stays. Hospital admitted patients with painful osteoporotic VCF who are managed conservatively and discharged are at risk for readmission.

摘要

背景

对伴有疼痛的骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(VCF)的住院患者进行椎体增强术(VA)已被证明可促进出院,减少镇痛需求并改善疼痛。

目的

我们的研究目的是比较接受疼痛性骨质疏松性 VCF 住院治疗的患者的总体成本,住院时间和再入院数据,这些患者接受药物治疗或接受住院 VA 治疗。

设置

单一学术医疗中心。

研究设计

经济分析

方法

使用 ICD-9 代码在 30 个月的时间内确定患有 VCF 的住院患者。比较 VA 组和非手术治疗组的总住院时间,住院费用,平均日费用和 30 天再入院率。还对年龄匹配的对照组进行了亚组分析。使用双尾 t 检验进行统计学意义。

结果

39 名住院患者接受了 VA;增强了 61 个级别。他们的平均年龄为 81.7 岁。有 209 名患者因 VCF 接受非手术治疗。他们的平均年龄为 72.7 岁,与 VA 组有明显的年龄差异(P <0.01)。VA 患者的平均住院时间为 13.8 天,而接受药物治疗的患者为 8.1 天(P <0.01)。VA 组的平均总费用为 26,074 美元,而药物治疗组为 15,507 美元(P <0.01)。VA 组的每日住院费用为 2,040 美元,而药物治疗组为 2,069 美元(P = 0.85)。VA 组的 VCF 再入院率为 0%,药物治疗组为 5.2%,年龄匹配的对照组为 7.7%。接受 VA 的患者中有 43%的人因抗凝或合并症而延迟了治疗。

局限性

该研究是回顾性的,并且使用计费数据作为总护理成本的指标。该研究未考虑椎体成形术和后凸成形术之间的成本差异。

结论

VA 可有效降低成本,VA 组和药物治疗组的每日成本相同。早期识别和咨询可以促进 VA 和快速出院。抗凝问题和合并症会延迟 VA 并延长住院时间。患有疼痛性骨质疏松性 VCF 的住院患者接受保守治疗并出院后,有再入院的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验