Suppr超能文献

早期骨水泥强化治疗可能是缓解骨质疏松性压缩性骨折疼痛的一种较好的治疗选择:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Early cement augmentation may be a good treatment option for pain relief for osteoporotic compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597, Singapore.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Center, National University Hospital, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2023 May;32(5):1751-1762. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07658-9. Epub 2023 Mar 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The incidence of osteoporotic compression fractures (VCFs) have been rising over the past decades. Presently, vertebral cement augmentation procedures such as balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are common treatments allowing pain relief and functional recovery. However, there is controversy on whether different timeframes for cement augmentation affects clinical outcomes. Hence, this study aimed to compare pain relief and complication rates between early versus late cement augmentation.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane Library was conducted, identifying studies that compared early versus late cement augmentation for VCFs. As the definitions of "early" and "late" phases across studies are heterogenous, we established the cut-off between early and late phase as intervals to accommodate as many studies as possible for analysis. We conducted two separate analyses with different cut-off intervals and included studies that reported interventions within these respective time intervals. In analysis 1, we included studies which grouped patients into "early" and "late" group based on a cut-off time frame of 2-4 weeks. On the other hand, in analysis 2, we included studies which grouped patients into "early" and "late" groups based on a cut-off time frame of 6-8 weeks. Meta-analysis was conducted via random-effect models, comparing outcomes of interest between early and late groups.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included. The total cohort size was 712 and 775 patients in analysis 1 and 2 respectively. Mean follow-up was 12.9 ± 3.7 months and 11 ± 0.6 months respectively. VAS change at final follow-up was significantly greater in the early group for both analyses. (MD = - 0.66, p = 0.01; and MD = - 1.18, p < 0.005 respectively). There was no significant difference in post-operative absolute VAS score, number of cement leakage, number of adjacent compression fractures and local kyphotic angle, for both analyses. Patients in both groups experienced reductions in VAS score that exceeded the minimum clinically important difference.

CONCLUSION

Both early and late timeframes for cement augmentation offered significant improvement in pain relief, with similar post-operative absolute pain score, kyphotic angle, cement leakage and adjacent vertebral fractures. Early surgery may offer substantial pain relief in patients presenting with pain as early as < 2-4 weeks of VCFs.

摘要

目的

过去几十年来,骨质疏松性压缩性骨折(VCF)的发病率一直在上升。目前,球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术和经皮椎体成形术等椎体骨水泥强化术是常见的治疗方法,可以缓解疼痛和恢复功能。然而,对于骨水泥强化的不同时间窗是否会影响临床结果仍存在争议。因此,本研究旨在比较早期和晚期骨水泥强化治疗 VCF 的止痛效果和并发症发生率。

方法

对 PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus 和 Cochrane Library 进行全面系统的综述,确定了比较早期和晚期骨水泥强化治疗 VCF 的研究。由于研究中“早期”和“晚期”阶段的定义存在差异,我们将早期和晚期之间的时间间隔设定为可容纳尽可能多的研究进行分析的时间间隔。我们进行了两项单独的分析,使用不同的截止时间间隔,并纳入了在相应时间间隔内进行干预的研究。在分析 1 中,我们根据 2-4 周的时间间隔将患者分为“早期”和“晚期”组。另一方面,在分析 2 中,我们根据 6-8 周的时间间隔将患者分为“早期”和“晚期”组。通过随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,比较早期和晚期组之间的研究结果。

结果

共纳入 11 项研究。分析 1 和 2 的总队列规模分别为 712 例和 775 例。平均随访时间分别为 12.9±3.7 个月和 11.0±0.6 个月。在两项分析中,最终随访时的 VAS 变化在早期组中均显著更大。(MD=-0.66,p=0.01;MD=-1.18,p<0.005)。两组术后绝对 VAS 评分、骨水泥渗漏数量、相邻压缩性骨折数量和局部后凸角均无显著差异。两组患者的 VAS 评分均有显著降低,超过了最小临床重要差异。

结论

早期和晚期骨水泥强化治疗均能显著缓解疼痛,术后绝对疼痛评分、后凸角、骨水泥渗漏和相邻椎体骨折相似。对于疼痛发生在 VCF 后<2-4 周的患者,早期手术可能会提供显著的疼痛缓解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验