Gregory B L, Plaisted-Grant K C
Cambridge Laboratory for Research into Autism (CLaRA), Department of Psychology, Free School Lane, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3RQ, UK.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 May;46(5):1503-12. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1951-3.
A high Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) score (Baron-Cohen et al. in J Autism Dev Disord 31(1):5-17, 2001) is increasingly used as a proxy in empirical studies of perceptual mechanisms in autism. Several investigations have assessed perception in non-autistic people measured for AQ, claiming the same relationship exists between performance on perceptual tasks in high-AQ individuals as observed in autism. We question whether the similarity in performance by high-AQ individuals and autistics reflects the same underlying perceptual cause in the context of two visual search tasks administered to a large sample of typical individuals assessed for AQ. Our results indicate otherwise and that deploying the AQ as a proxy for autism introduces unsubstantiated assumptions about high-AQ individuals, the endophenotypes they express, and their relationship to Autistic Spectrum Conditions (ASC) individuals.
高自闭症谱系商数(AQ)得分(Baron-Cohen等人,《自闭症与发育障碍杂志》,2001年,第31卷第1期,第5 - 17页)在自闭症感知机制的实证研究中越来越多地被用作替代指标。多项研究评估了具有不同AQ得分的非自闭症个体的感知能力,声称高AQ个体在感知任务中的表现与自闭症患者所观察到的表现存在相同的关系。在对大量接受AQ评估的典型个体进行的两项视觉搜索任务中,我们质疑高AQ个体与自闭症患者在表现上的相似性是否反映了相同的潜在感知原因。我们的结果表明并非如此,并且将AQ用作自闭症的替代指标会引入关于高AQ个体、他们所表现出的内表型以及他们与自闭症谱系障碍(ASC)个体之间关系的未经证实的假设。