Suppr超能文献

一个用于开发有效且可持续的根本原因分析系统安全解决方案的循证工具包。

An evidence-based toolkit for the development of effective and sustainable root cause analysis system safety solutions.

作者信息

Hettinger A Zachary, Fairbanks Rollin J, Hegde Sudeep, Rackoff Alexandra S, Wreathall John, Lewis Vicki L, Bisantz Ann M, Wears Robert L

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Emergency Medicine at Georgetown University School of Medicine and Director of Informatics Research, National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare.

出版信息

J Healthc Risk Manag. 2013;33(2):11-20. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21122.

Abstract

Root cause analysis (RCA) after adverse events in healthcare is a standard practice at many institutions. However, healthcare has failed to see a dramatic improvement in patient safety over the last decade. In order to improve the RCA process, this study used systems safety science, which is based partly on human factors engineering principles and has been applied with success in other high-risk industries like aviation. A multi-institutional dataset of 334 RCA cases and 782 solutions was analyzed using qualitative methods. A team of safety science experts developed a model of 13 RCA solutions categories through an iterative process, using semi-structured interview data from 44 frontline staff members from 7 different hospital-based unit types. These categories were placed in a model and toolkit to help guide RCA teams in developing sustainable and effective solutions to prevent future adverse events. This study was limited by its retrospective review of cases and use of interviews rather than clinical observations. In conclusion, systems safety principles were used to develop guidelines for RCA teams to promote systems-level sustainable and effective solutions for adverse events.

摘要

医疗保健领域不良事件后的根本原因分析(RCA)在许多机构都是一种标准做法。然而,在过去十年中,医疗保健领域在患者安全方面并未取得显著改善。为了改进RCA流程,本研究采用了系统安全科学,该科学部分基于人因工程学原理,并且已在航空等其他高风险行业成功应用。使用定性方法分析了一个包含334个RCA案例和782个解决方案的多机构数据集。一组安全科学专家通过迭代过程,利用来自7种不同医院科室类型的44名一线工作人员的半结构化访谈数据,开发了一个包含13个RCA解决方案类别的模型。这些类别被纳入一个模型和工具包,以帮助指导RCA团队制定可持续且有效的解决方案,防止未来发生不良事件。本研究受到其对案例的回顾性审查以及使用访谈而非临床观察的限制。总之,系统安全原则被用于为RCA团队制定指南,以促进针对不良事件的系统级可持续且有效解决方案。

相似文献

2
Our current approach to root cause analysis: is it contributing to our failure to improve patient safety?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):381-387. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005991. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
3
Using Safety-II and resilient healthcare principles to learn from Never Events.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 May 20;32(3):196-203. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa009.
4
Root cause analysis of critical events in neurosurgery, New South Wales.
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Sep;85(9):626-30. doi: 10.1111/ans.12934. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
5
Root-cause analysis and health failure mode and effect analysis: two leading techniques in health care quality assessment.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Jun;11(6):572-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.024. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
6
Improving the Effectiveness of Root Cause Analysis in Hospitals.
Hosp Top. 2021 Jan-Mar;99(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/00185868.2020.1824137. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
7
Patient Safety/Quality Improvement Primer, Part II: Prevention of Harm Through Root Cause Analysis and Action (RCA).
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Dec;161(6):911-921. doi: 10.1177/0194599819878683. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
8
How is the effectiveness of root cause analysis measured in healthcare?
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2015 Sep;35(2):21-30. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21198.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of accident models and incident analysis techniques.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Mar;26(3):e14623. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14623. Epub 2025 Feb 2.
2
Improvement proposals and actions in medication error reports: Quality and strength: A cross-sectional study.
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 18;7(9):e70077. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70077. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Exploring the "Black Box" of Recommendation Generation in Local Health Care Incident Investigations: A Scoping Review.
J Patient Saf. 2023 Dec 1;19(8):553-563. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001164. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
5
Pediatric Tracheostomy Emergency Readiness Assessment Tool: International Consensus Recommendations.
Laryngoscope. 2023 Dec;133(12):3588-3601. doi: 10.1002/lary.30674. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
6
Tools for the investigation of adverse events: scoping review.
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2022 Jun 10;56:e20210519. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2021-0519en. eCollection 2022.
7
Clinician Perceptions on the Use of Free-Text Communication Orders.
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 May;12(3):484-494. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731002. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
9
Contributing factors to severe complications after liver resection: an aggregate root cause analysis in 105 consecutive patients.
Patient Saf Surg. 2020 Sep 29;14:36. doi: 10.1186/s13037-020-00261-7. eCollection 2020.
10
Variation in electronic test results management and its implications for patient safety: A multisite investigation.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Aug 1;27(8):1214-1224. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa093.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 25;363(22):2124-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1004404.
2
Patient safety at ten: unmistakable progress, troubling gaps.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):165-73. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0785. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
3
The effectiveness of root cause analysis: what does the literature tell us?
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 Jul;34(7):391-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34049-5.
4
Teaching quality improvement: a collaboration project between medicine and engineering.
Am J Med Qual. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(4):296-301. doi: 10.1177/1062860608317764.
5
Effectiveness and efficiency of root cause analysis in medicine.
JAMA. 2008 Feb 13;299(6):685-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.6.685.
8
Actions and implementation strategies to reduce suicidal events in the Veterans Health Administration.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006 Mar;32(3):130-41. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(06)32018-1.
9
The long road to patient safety: a status report on patient safety systems.
JAMA. 2005 Dec 14;294(22):2858-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.22.2858.
10
Accidental deaths, saved lives, and improved quality.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 29;353(13):1405-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb051157.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验