• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高医院根本原因分析的有效性。

Improving the Effectiveness of Root Cause Analysis in Hospitals.

机构信息

iVantage Health Analytics, Newton, MA, USA.

Department of Health Professions, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA.

出版信息

Hosp Top. 2021 Jan-Mar;99(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/00185868.2020.1824137. Epub 2020 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1080/00185868.2020.1824137
PMID:32969765
Abstract

Improving patient safety within hospitals has become a major focal point for administrative and clinical action. Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is an analytical tool used by hospitals in quality improvement and patient safety efforts. While hospitals have widely embraced RCA, the effectiveness of the RCA process has been questioned in recent years. Based on a literature review and feedback from practicing administrators, this paper identifies current barriers to the effectiveness of the RCA process, and suggests actions to overcome them. A more effective RCA process will enable hospitals to establish a safer and more trustworthy care environment for patients.

摘要

提高医院内的患者安全已成为行政和临床行动的主要焦点。根本原因分析(RCA)是医院在质量改进和患者安全工作中使用的分析工具。虽然医院广泛采用 RCA,但近年来 RCA 过程的有效性受到了质疑。本文通过文献回顾和对实际管理人员的反馈,确定了当前 RCA 流程有效性的障碍,并提出了克服这些障碍的措施。更有效的 RCA 流程将使医院能够为患者建立更安全、更值得信赖的护理环境。

相似文献

1
Improving the Effectiveness of Root Cause Analysis in Hospitals.提高医院根本原因分析的有效性。
Hosp Top. 2021 Jan-Mar;99(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/00185868.2020.1824137. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
2
An evidence-based toolkit for the development of effective and sustainable root cause analysis system safety solutions.一个用于开发有效且可持续的根本原因分析系统安全解决方案的循证工具包。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2013;33(2):11-20. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21122.
3
Root-cause analysis and health failure mode and effect analysis: two leading techniques in health care quality assessment.根本原因分析与健康失效模式及后果分析:医疗质量评估中的两种主要技术。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Jun;11(6):572-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.024. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
4
Aggregate analysis of sentinel events as a strategic tool in safety management can contribute to the improvement of healthcare safety.将哨点事件进行汇总分析作为安全管理中的一项战略工具,有助于改善医疗安全。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Mar 1;31(2):110-116. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy116.
5
Patient Safety/Quality Improvement Primer, Part II: Prevention of Harm Through Root Cause Analysis and Action (RCA).患者安全/质量改进基础教程,第二部分:通过根本原因分析和行动(RCA)预防伤害。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Dec;161(6):911-921. doi: 10.1177/0194599819878683. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
6
Implementing root cause analysis in Iranian hospitals: challenges and benefits.在伊朗医院实施根本原因分析:挑战与益处
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2017 Apr;32(2):147-162. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2335. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
7
Root cause analysis of critical events in neurosurgery, New South Wales.新南威尔士州神经外科危急事件的根本原因分析
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Sep;85(9):626-30. doi: 10.1111/ans.12934. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
8
Using Safety-II and resilient healthcare principles to learn from Never Events.运用安全 II 原则和弹性医疗保健原则,从“永不发生”事件中汲取教训。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 May 20;32(3):196-203. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa009.
9
A cross-sectional study on the relationship between utilization of root cause analysis and patient safety at 139 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers.一项关于139家退伍军人事务部医疗中心根本原因分析的应用与患者安全之间关系的横断面研究。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Jan;39(1):32-7. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39006-0.
10
How is the effectiveness of root cause analysis measured in healthcare?在医疗保健领域,根本原因分析的有效性是如何衡量的?
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2015 Sep;35(2):21-30. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21198.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric 3D MRCP imaging: strategies for enhancing exam quality.儿科三维磁共振胰胆管造影成像:提高检查质量的策略
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05063-y.
2
Improving initial vital signs assessment and documentation in the emergency department of regional hospital, Bhutan: quality improvement project.改善不丹地区医院急诊科的初始生命体征评估与记录:质量改进项目
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 May 30;13(Suppl 1):e003151. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003151.
3
Initiative to improve oxygen prescribing and oxygen delivery to patients in the emergency department of a national referral hospital.
在一家国家级转诊医院急诊科开展改善患者氧气处方及氧气输送的倡议。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Mar 24;14(1):e003132. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003132.
4
Improving role allocation for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the emergency department: a quality improvement project.提高急诊科心肺复苏(CPR)的角色分配:一项质量改进项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Sep 30;13(3):e002870. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002870.
5
Monitoring and Root Cause Analysis of Clinical Biochemistry Turnaround Time at a Tertiary Care Institute.某三级医疗机构临床生化检验周转时间的监测与根本原因分析
Cureus. 2023 Jun 1;15(6):e39821. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39821. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
The Incident Feedback Committee (IFC): A Useful Tool to Investigate Errors in Clinical Research.事件反馈委员会(IFC):一种用于调查临床研究中错误的有用工具。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 21;10(7):1354. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10071354.
7
Generic analysis method to learn from serious adverse events in Dutch hospitals: a human factors perspective.从荷兰医院严重不良事件中学习的通用分析方法:人为因素视角。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Feb;11(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001637.