• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不良事件调查工具：范围综述。

Tools for the investigation of adverse events: scoping review.

机构信息

Universidade Federal Fluminense, Escola de Enfermagem Aurora Afonso Costa, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Centro Brasileiro para o Cuidado à Saúde Informado por Evidências: Centro de Excelência do Instituto Joanna Briggs, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2022 Jun 10;56:e20210519. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2021-0519en. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2021-0519en
PMID:35724262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10114091/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To map, in the literature, the risk management tools aimed at investigating health adverse events.

METHOD

Scoping review according to the Joanna Brigss Institute, with acronym PCC (Population: hospitalized patients, Concept: tools for the investigation of adverse events, and Context: health institutions) carried out in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, LILACS, Scopus, CINAHL, and gray literature.

RESULTS

The search totaled 825 scientific productions, 31 of which met the objective of the study, which consisted of 27 scientific articles and 4 expert consensus. It was possible to carry out a synthesis of the necessary steps for the investigation of adverse events and use of the tools according to the extent of damage.

CONCLUSION

The practice of investigating adverse events should be guided by a thorough understanding of contributing factors, a fair culture, and the involvement of senior leadership.

摘要

目的

在文献中绘制旨在调查医疗不良事件的风险管理工具。

方法

根据 Joanna Brigss 研究所的方案，采用缩写 PCC（人群：住院患者，概念：不良事件调查工具，背景：医疗机构）进行了 MEDLINE（OVID）、EMBASE、LILACS、Scopus、CINAHL 和灰色文献的范围审查。

结果

共检索到 825 篇科学文献，其中 31 篇符合研究目的，包括 27 篇科学文章和 4 篇专家共识。可以根据损害程度综合总结出调查不良事件和使用工具的必要步骤。

结论

调查不良事件的实践应基于对促成因素、公正文化和高级领导层参与的透彻理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a6/10114091/bb7090f2b5b9/1980-220X-reeusp-56-e20210519-gf04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a6/10114091/e4c6240654a4/1980-220X-reeusp-56-e20210519-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a6/10114091/c118d00c135f/1980-220X-reeusp-56-e20210519-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a6/10114091/2d5823aa3fd3/1980-220X-reeusp-56-e20210519-gf03-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a6/10114091/bb7090f2b5b9/1980-220X-reeusp-56-e20210519-gf04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a6/10114091/e4c6240654a4/1980-220X-reeusp-56-e20210519-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a6/10114091/c118d00c135f/1980-220X-reeusp-56-e20210519-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a6/10114091/2d5823aa3fd3/1980-220X-reeusp-56-e20210519-gf03-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a6/10114091/bb7090f2b5b9/1980-220X-reeusp-56-e20210519-gf04.jpg

相似文献

1
Tools for the investigation of adverse events: scoping review.不良事件调查工具：范围综述。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2022 Jun 10;56:e20210519. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2021-0519en. eCollection 2022.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树：影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
eHealth Tools Supporting Early Childhood Education and Care Centers to Assess and Enhance Nutrition and Physical Activity Environments: Protocol for a Scoping Review.支持幼儿教育与照料中心评估和改善营养与身体活动环境的电子健康工具：一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Oct 24;12:e52252. doi: 10.2196/52252.
4
Assessing and Enhancing Nutrition and Physical Activity Environments in Early Childhood Education and Care Centers: Scoping Review of eHealth Tools.评估与改善幼儿教育与保育中心的营养与身体活动环境：电子健康工具的范围综述
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2025 Jan 22;8:e68372. doi: 10.2196/68372.
5
Factors associated with pulmonary tuberculosis in elderly individuals: A protocol for a scoping review.老年个体中与肺结核相关的因素：一项范围综述方案
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 13;20(2):e0318375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318375. eCollection 2025.
6
Exploring the competencies of nephrology nurses: A comprehensive scoping review.探索肾脏病学护士的能力：一项全面的范围综述。
Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Mar;72(1):e13085. doi: 10.1111/inr.13085.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区，服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中，叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Pain Assessment Tools for Infants, Children, and Adolescents With Cancer: Protocol for a Scoping Review.癌症婴幼儿及青少年疼痛评估工具：范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 28;14:e66614. doi: 10.2196/66614.
9
Prognostic prediction models and clinical tools based on consensus to support patient prioritization for clinical pharmacy services in hospitals: A scoping review.基于共识的预后预测模型和临床工具，以支持医院临床药学服务中的患者优先排序：范围综述。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Apr;17(4):653-663. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
10
The Impact of Secure Messaging in the Treatment of Patients With Diabetes Within a Primary Care Setting: Protocol for a Scoping Review.安全消息传递在基层医疗环境中对糖尿病患者治疗的影响：一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 May 2;12:e42339. doi: 10.2196/42339.

本文引用的文献

1
Tracer Methodology and the quality of care: integrative literature review.示踪方法与医疗质量：综合文献综述
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2019 Oct 14;40:e20180142. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2019.20180142. eCollection 2019.
2
The contribution of legal medicine in clinical risk management.法医学在临床风险管理中的作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb 1;19(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3846-7.
3
Implementation of patient safety centers and the healthcare-associated infections.患者安全中心的实施与医疗相关感染
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2019 Jan 10;40(spe):e20180306. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2019.20180306.
4
Patient safety nucleus: the pathway in a general hospital.患者安全核心：综合医院中的路径
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2019 Jan 10;40(spe):e20180150. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2019.20180150.
5
Experience feedback committees: A way of implementing a root cause analysis practice in hospital medical departments.经验反馈委员会：在医院医疗部门实施根本原因分析实践的一种方式。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 26;13(7):e0201067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201067. eCollection 2018.
6
Are root cause analyses recommendations effective and sustainable? An observational study.根本原因分析建议是否有效且可持续？一项观察性研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Mar 1;30(2):124-131. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx181.
7
An Analysis of Adverse Events in the Rehabilitation Department: Using the Veterans Affairs Root Cause Analysis System.对康复科不良事件的分析：利用退伍军人事务部根本原因分析系统。
Phys Ther. 2018 Apr 1;98(4):223-230. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy003.
8
Analysis of incidents notified in a general hospital.综合医院上报事件分析。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018 Jan-Feb;71(1):111-119. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0574.
9
[Description of contributing factors in adverse events related to patient safety and their preventability].[与患者安全相关不良事件的促成因素及其可预防性描述]
Aten Primaria. 2018 Oct;50(8):486-492. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
10
[Analysis of incident reports in an anesthesiology unit of a university hospital].[大学医院麻醉科不良事件报告分析]
Rev Med Chil. 2017 Apr;145(4):441-448. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872017000400004.