Kuyinu E, Levine W A, Grisius R, Fenster R
Georgetown University, School of Dentistry, Washington, D.C.
J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Mar;63(3):292-5. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90198-l.
A model was made to represent the in vivo situation for resin-bonded restorations using metal bonded to enamel. The tensile bond strength of chemically etched metal bonded to enamel was compared with that obtained with electrolytically etched metal. Four resin luting agents were used with the following results: the tensile bond strength of chemically etched non-noble alloy bonded to enamel was lower than strengths obtained for electrolytically etched alloy. The differences, however, were not statistically significant. Of the four luting resins, Comspan Regular gave the highest mean bond strength.
制作了一个模型来模拟使用金属与牙釉质结合的树脂粘结修复体在体内的情况。将化学蚀刻金属与牙釉质结合的拉伸粘结强度与电解蚀刻金属的拉伸粘结强度进行了比较。使用了四种树脂粘结剂，结果如下：化学蚀刻的非贵金属合金与牙釉质结合的拉伸粘结强度低于电解蚀刻合金的强度。然而，这些差异没有统计学意义。在四种粘结树脂中，Comspan Regular的平均粘结强度最高。
