Authors' Affiliations: Institute of Biomedical Technology and Institute of Signal Processing, Prostate Cancer Research Center, BioMediTech, Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Departments of Pathology and Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-ku, Tokyo; Department of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Chiba, Japan; Departments of Pathology and Urology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Clinical Chemistry, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Dec;22(12):2333-44. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0333-T. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
The associations of ERG overexpression with clinical behavior and molecular pathways of prostate cancer are incompletely known. We assessed the association of ERG expression with AR, PTEN, SPINK1, Ki-67, and EZH2 expression levels, deletion, and mutations of chromosomal region 3p14 and TP53, and clinicopathologic variables.
The material consisted of 326 prostatectomies, 166 needle biopsies from men treated primarily with endocrine therapy, 177 transurethral resections of castration-resistant prostate cancers (CRPC), and 114 CRPC metastases obtained from 32 men. Immunohistochemistry, FISH, and sequencing was used for the measurements.
ERG expression was found in about 45% of all patient cohorts. In a multivariate analysis, ERG expression showed independent value of favorable prognosis (P = 0.019). ERG positivity was significantly associated with loss of PTEN expression in prostatectomy (P = 0.0348), and locally recurrent CRPCs (P = 0.0042). Loss of PTEN expression was associated (P = 0.0085) with shorter progression-free survival in ERG-positive, but not in negative cases. When metastases in each subject were compared, consistent ERG, PTEN, and AR expression as well as TP53 mutations were found in a majority of subjects.
A similar frequency of ERG positivity from early to late stage of the disease suggests lack of selection of ERG expression during disease progression. The prognostic significance of PTEN loss solely in ERG-positive cases indicates interaction of these pathways. The finding of consistent genetic alterations in different metastases suggests that the major genetic alterations take place in the primary tumor.
Interaction of PTEN and ERG pathways warrants further studies.
ERG 过表达与前列腺癌的临床行为和分子途径的关联尚不完全清楚。我们评估了 ERG 表达与 AR、PTEN、SPINK1、Ki-67 和 EZH2 表达水平、3p14 染色体区域和 TP53 的缺失和突变以及临床病理变量的相关性。
该材料包括 326 例前列腺切除术、166 例接受内分泌治疗的男性的经皮穿刺活检、177 例去势抵抗性前列腺癌(CRPC)的经尿道切除术和 114 例来自 32 名男性的 CRPC 转移。使用免疫组织化学、FISH 和测序进行测量。
在所有患者队列中,约有 45%的患者表达 ERG。在多变量分析中,ERG 表达具有良好预后的独立价值(P=0.019)。在前列腺癌(P=0.0348)和局部复发性 CRPC(P=0.0042)中,ERG 阳性与 PTEN 表达缺失显著相关。PTEN 表达缺失与 ERG 阳性但阴性病例的无进展生存期缩短相关(P=0.0085)。当比较每个患者的转移时,大多数患者的 ERG、PTEN 和 AR 表达以及 TP53 突变一致。
疾病早期到晚期 ERG 阳性的频率相似,提示在疾病进展过程中缺乏 ERG 表达的选择。仅在 ERG 阳性病例中 PTEN 缺失的预后意义表明这些途径的相互作用。不同转移中一致的遗传改变表明主要的遗传改变发生在原发性肿瘤中。
PTEN 和 ERG 途径的相互作用需要进一步研究。