Service d'ophtalmologie, Hopital Pellegrin, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; Université Bordeaux Segalen, Bordeaux, France; INSERM, L'Institut de Santé Publique, d'Épidémiologie et de Développement (ISPED), Centre INSERM U897-Epidemiologie-Biostatistique, Bordeaux, France.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Ophthalmology. 2014 Jan;121(1):202-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injections for treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).
A randomized, multicenter, double-masked phase 3 study.
A total of 177 treatment-naive patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO were randomized in a 3:2 ratio.
Patients received either 2-mg intravitreal aflibercept or sham injections every 4 weeks for 20 weeks. From week 24 to 48, the aflibercept group received aflibercept as needed (pro re nata [PRN]), and the sham group continued receiving sham injections.
The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients who gained 15 letters or more in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 24. This study reports week 52 results including the proportion of patients who gained 15 letters or more in BCVA and the mean change from baseline BCVA and central retinal thickness. Efficacy end points at week 52 were all exploratory.
At week 52, the mean percentage of patients gaining 15 letters or more was 60.2% in the aflibercept group and 32.4% in the sham group (P = 0.0004). Aflibercept patients, compared with sham patients, had a significantly higher mean improvement in BCVA (+16.9 letters vs. +3.8 letters, respectively) and reduction in central retinal thickness (-423.5 μm vs. -219.3 μm, respectively) at week 52 (P < 0.0001 for both). Aflibercept patients received a mean of 2.5 injections (standard deviation, 1.7 injections) during PRN dosing. The most common ocular adverse events in the aflibercept group were related to the injection procedure or the underlying disease, and included macular edema (33.7%), increased intraocular pressure (17.3%), and eye pain (14.4%).
Treatment with intravitreal aflibercept provided significant functional and anatomic benefits after 52 weeks as compared with sham. The improvements achieved after 6 monthly doses at week 24 largely were maintained until week 52 with as-needed dosing. Intravitreal aflibercept generally was well tolerated.
评估玻璃体内注射阿柏西普治疗视网膜中央静脉阻塞(CRVO)继发黄斑水肿的疗效和安全性。
一项随机、多中心、双盲 3 期研究。
共 177 例未经治疗的 CRVO 继发黄斑水肿患者,按 3:2 的比例随机分组。
患者每 4 周接受 2mg 玻璃体内注射阿柏西普或假注射,共 20 周。从第 24 周到第 48 周,阿柏西普组根据需要(按需)接受阿柏西普治疗(即治疗反应不佳时),假注射组继续接受假注射。
主要疗效终点为第 24 周最佳矫正视力(BCVA)增加 15 个字母或更多的患者比例。本研究报告第 52 周的结果,包括 BCVA 增加 15 个字母或更多的患者比例以及基线时 BCVA 和中心视网膜厚度的平均变化。第 52 周的疗效终点均为探索性终点。
第 52 周时,阿柏西普组和假注射组分别有 60.2%和 32.4%的患者 BCVA 增加 15 个字母或更多(P=0.0004)。与假注射组相比,阿柏西普组患者的 BCVA 平均改善更显著(分别增加 16.9 个字母和 3.8 个字母),中心视网膜厚度平均降低更显著(分别降低 423.5μm 和 219.3μm)(均 P<0.0001)。阿柏西普组患者在 PRN 治疗期间平均接受 2.5 次注射(标准差 1.7 次)。阿柏西普组最常见的眼部不良事件与注射过程或基础疾病有关,包括黄斑水肿(33.7%)、眼压升高(17.3%)和眼痛(14.4%)。
与假注射相比,玻璃体内注射阿柏西普治疗在 52 周时可显著改善视力和解剖结构。第 24 周时,经过 6 个月的治疗,患者在第 52 周时获得的改善基本可保持,且只需按需治疗。玻璃体内注射阿柏西普通常可耐受。