Suppr超能文献

门诊抗生素处方与使用的适当国际措施:来自不同措施国家数据比较的建议

Appropriate international measures for outpatient antibiotic prescribing and consumption: recommendations from a national data comparison of different measures.

作者信息

Coenen Samuel, Gielen Birgit, Blommaert Adriaan, Beutels Philippe, Hens Niel, Goossens Herman

机构信息

Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Feb;69(2):529-34. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt385. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Many European countries have engaged in awareness campaigns to decrease outpatient antibiotic use and several measures have been proposed, e.g. the number of defined daily doses (DDDs) or packages per 1000 inhabitants per day, producing conflicting findings. Therefore, we set out to explore what measure is most appropriate.

METHODS

Outpatient data on each dispensed and reimbursed medicinal package in Belgium between 2002 and 2009 were aggregated at the level of the active substance in accordance with the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification and expressed as the numbers of DDDs (WHO, version 2010), packages, treatments and insured individuals per 1000 inhabitants, insured individuals and patient contacts, per day, and in July-June years. Using these measures, time trends of outpatient antibiotic use were compared and explored in detail.

RESULTS

Expressed per 1000 inhabitants per day, outpatient antibiotic use increased between 2002-03 and 2008-09 in DDDs, whereas in packages, treatments and insured individuals it decreased. The same was true for use expressed per 1000 insured individuals or when allowing for the decreasing number of patient contacts. Increasing numbers of DDDs per package (more items per package and higher doses per unit for amoxicillin and co-amoxiclav) explain these discrepancies.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of packages is a more appropriate measure than the number of DDDs when assessing outpatient antibiotic use over time and the impact of awareness campaigns in countries dispensing 'complete packages'. We recommended the use of different complementary measures or caution when interpreting trends based only on DDDs.

摘要

目的

许多欧洲国家开展了提高认识的活动以减少门诊抗生素使用,并提出了若干措施,例如每千居民每日限定日剂量(DDD)数或包装数,但研究结果相互矛盾。因此,我们着手探讨哪种措施最为合适。

方法

根据解剖治疗化学分类,汇总了2002年至2009年比利时每个已配药和已报销药品包装的门诊数据,并按照活性物质水平进行统计,以每千居民、参保个体、每日以及按7月至次年6月计算的DDD数(世界卫生组织,2010年版)、包装数、治疗数和参保个体数来表示。使用这些指标,对门诊抗生素使用的时间趋势进行了比较和详细探讨。

结果

按每千居民每日计算,门诊抗生素使用在2002 - 2003年至2008 - 2009年期间,以DDD数计有所增加,而以包装数、治疗数和参保个体数计则有所下降。按每千参保个体计算或考虑到患者接触次数减少时,情况也是如此。每个包装的DDD数增加(阿莫西林和阿莫西林克拉维酸钾每包装的项目更多且每单位剂量更高)解释了这些差异。

结论

在评估随时间变化的门诊抗生素使用情况以及在发放“完整包装”药品的国家中提高认识活动的影响时,包装数是比DDD数更合适的指标。我们建议在仅基于DDD数解释趋势时使用不同的补充指标或谨慎对待。

相似文献

9
Outpatient use of systemic antibiotics in croatia.克罗地亚全身性抗生素的门诊使用情况。
Pharm World Sci. 2005 Jun;27(3):230-5. doi: 10.1007/s11096-004-3704-z.
10

引用本文的文献

8
The Decline in Outpatient Antibiotic Use.门诊抗生素使用量下降。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Oct 9;117(41):679-686. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0679.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验