Pedersen Reidar, Hem Marit Helene, Gjerberg Elisabeth, Førde Reidun
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2013 Oct 1;133(18):1935-9. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.13.0237.
The use of coercion in nursing homes is common as well as challenging, but was not regulated by law until 2009. Two key conditions are that the patient must be without mental competence and that the coercive measures are in the patient's best interest. Inspection reports have revealed insufficient application of the law, and this is of concern to patients as well as healthcare staff. With the aid of a qualitative study, we wished to identify the challenges encountered and the experiences gained by doctors and other nursing-home personnel from the new provisions regarding the use of coercion.
A total of 65 nursing-home employees were interviewed in focus groups. The interview guide included questions on, for example, when coercion is being used and how the new chapter of the Act is being applied. In the qualitative analysis, the content of the statements was categorised and condensed.
All focus-group interviews described coercion as frequently occurring, but also that few formal decisions are being made. Involvement of the doctors and inter-disciplinary cooperation were assessed as crucial for ensuring appropriate application of the new regulations, in addition to time, staffing and competence. The participants were uncertain as to how the new regulations should be applied, and regarded the requirements for a formal decision as unrealistic. Some of the coercive measures described are illegal. The absence of legal authority in cases where coercion is regarded as the lesser evil was described as challenging.
The new legal basis for the use of coercion is likely to raise awareness of the issue, but has a large potential for erroneous interpretation and causing reluctance to make formal decisions. In some areas, the law is out of step with the realities in nursing homes and the employees' values.
在养老院中,使用强制手段既常见又具有挑战性,但直到2009年才受到法律规范。两个关键条件是患者必须无行为能力,且强制措施符合患者的最大利益。检查报告显示法律的应用不足,这引起了患者和医护人员的关注。借助一项定性研究,我们希望确定医生和其他养老院工作人员在使用强制手段的新规定方面遇到的挑战以及获得的经验。
共对65名养老院员工进行了焦点小组访谈。访谈指南包括诸如何时使用强制手段以及该法案的新篇章如何应用等问题。在定性分析中,对陈述内容进行了分类和提炼。
所有焦点小组访谈都描述了强制手段频繁发生,但正式决策却很少。除了时间、人员配备和能力外,医生的参与和跨学科合作被认为对确保新规定的适当应用至关重要。参与者不确定新规定应如何应用,并认为正式决策的要求不切实际。所描述的一些强制手段是非法的。在将强制手段视为两害相权取其轻的情况下缺乏法律授权被描述为具有挑战性。
使用强制手段的新法律依据可能会提高对该问题的认识,但存在被错误解读以及导致不愿做出正式决策的巨大可能性。在某些方面,法律与养老院的实际情况和员工价值观脱节。