Friederichs Hendrik, Ligges Sandra, Weissenstein Anne
University of Muenster, Studienhospital, Muenster, Germany (HF, AW).
University of Muenster, Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Muenster, Germany (SL)
Med Decis Making. 2014 Feb;34(2):253-7. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13504499. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
Physicians and medical students may lack sufficient numeracy skills to make treatment decisions, interpret test results, and practice evidence-based medicine. We evaluated whether the use of a tree diagram without numerical values as an aid for numerical processing might improve students' test results when dealing with percentages.
A prospective randomized study was carried out with 102 third-year students. Participants received 3 diagnostic test problems and were asked to determine positive predictive values. The information in these tests was expressed either in (1) natural frequencies, (2) conditional probabilities, or (3) conditional probabilities with a tree diagram without numbers.
Ninety-eight (96.1%) complete data sets could be obtained. The group working with natural frequencies achieved significantly higher test results (n = 29, mean score: 1.1, P = 0.045) than the group working with conditional probabilities (n = 34, mean score: 0.56). The students who were given a tree diagram in addition to conditional probabilities (n = 35, mean score: 1.26) also achieved significantly better scores than the group with conditional probabilities alone (P = 0.008). The difference between the group who had received natural frequencies and the group working with conditional probabilities and the tree diagram was not significant.
We suggest the use of a tree diagram as a visual aid when dealing with diagnostic tests expressed in conditional probabilities.
医生和医学生可能缺乏足够的计算能力来做出治疗决策、解读检查结果以及实践循证医学。我们评估了使用无数值的树形图作为数值处理辅助工具是否能在学生处理百分比时提高测试成绩。
对102名三年级学生进行了一项前瞻性随机研究。参与者收到3个诊断测试问题,并被要求确定阳性预测值。这些测试中的信息以以下三种方式呈现:(1)自然频率,(2)条件概率,或(3)带有无数字树形图的条件概率。
可获得98份(96.1%)完整数据集。使用自然频率的组取得的测试成绩显著高于使用条件概率的组(n = 29,平均得分:1.1,P = 0.045)(n = 34,平均得分:0.56)。除条件概率外还获得树形图的学生(n = 35,平均得分:1.26)的成绩也显著优于仅使用条件概率的组(P = 0.008)。接受自然频率的组与使用条件概率和树形图的组之间的差异不显著。
我们建议在处理以条件概率表示的诊断测试时,使用树形图作为视觉辅助工具。