Currently a Senior Economist at the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO).
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Fall;41(3):611-9. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12070.
The problem of the manipulation of data that arises when there is both opportunity and incentive to mislead is better accepted and studied - though by no means solved - in financial accounting than in medicine. This article analyzes pharmaceutical company manipulation of medical research as part of a broader problem of corporate manipulation of data in the creation of accounting profits. The article explores how our understanding of accounting fraud and misinformation helps us understand the risk of similar information manipulation in the medical sciences. This understanding provides a framework for considering how best to improve the quality of medical research and analysis in light of the current system of medical information production. I offer three possible responses: (1) use of the Dodd-Frank whistleblower provisions to encourage reporting of medical research fraud; (2) a two-step academic journal review process for clinical trials; and (3) publicly subsidized trial-failure insurance. These would improve the release of negative information about drugs, thereby increasing the reliability of positive information.
当存在误导的机会和动机时,数据操纵的问题在财务会计中比在医学中得到了更好的接受和研究——尽管远未得到解决。本文分析了制药公司对医学研究的操纵,这是公司在创造会计利润时操纵数据这一更大问题的一部分。本文探讨了我们对会计欺诈和错误信息的理解如何帮助我们理解医学领域类似信息操纵的风险。这种理解为考虑如何根据当前的医学信息生产系统,最好地提高医学研究和分析的质量提供了一个框架。我提出了三种可能的应对措施:(1)利用多德-弗兰克举报人条款鼓励报告医学研究欺诈;(2)对临床试验进行两步学术期刊审查程序;(3)提供公共补贴的试验失败保险。这些措施将改善关于药物的负面信息的发布,从而提高正面信息的可靠性。