Suppr超能文献

肝门上方血管控制及在肝大部切除术和肝小部切除术中用吻合器离断肝蒂

Suprahilar vascular control and stapling device transection of Glissonian pedicle in major and minor hepatectomies.

作者信息

Karamarković Aleksandar, Doklestić Krstina, Popović Nada, Gregorić Pavle, Vujadinović Sanja Tomanović, Milić Natasa

出版信息

Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Nov-Dec;60(128):2060-8. doi: 10.5754/hge13512.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In this study we analyzed our experience of suprahilar-posterior intrahepatic Glissonian pedicle approach using an endo-GIA vascular stapling device for the pedicle and hepatic vein division.

METHODOLOGY

Sixty-eight 68 major and 102 minor liver resections were performed. The hilar extrahepatic structures remain intact, and during parenchyma dissection by CUSA, the whole right or left or the appropriate segmental pedicle was isolated intrahepatically and then transected using a stapler device.

RESULTS

The minor liver resections was associated with significantly shorter surgery duration (95.1 + 31.1 vs. 186.6 +/- 56.5) and transection time (35.9 +/- 14.5 vs. 65.3 +/- 17.2) than major hepatectomies (p < 0.001 for all). The mean blood loss was 255.6 + 129.9 mL in minor resection and 385.7 + 200.1 mL in major resection (p = 0.003). The mean blood transfusion requirement was 300.8 + 99.5 mL for the patients with minor hepatectomy and 450.9 + 89.6 mL for those with major liver resection (p = 0.067). There was no significant difference in morbidity and mortality between the groups (p = 0.989; p = 0.920). Major as well as minor liver resection were a superior oncologic operation with no significant difference in the 3-year overall survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transection using CUSA with suprahilar endo-GIA stapling of Glisson's pedicle, as well as major hepatic veins represents an effective and safe surgical procedure.

摘要

背景/目的:在本研究中,我们分析了使用腔内切割吻合器(endo-GIA)处理肝门后肝内Glisson蒂入路在处理肝蒂和肝静脉离断方面的经验。

方法

共进行了68例大肝切除和102例小肝切除。肝门部肝外结构保持完整,在使用超声外科吸引器(CUSA)进行肝实质离断过程中,在肝内分离出整个右侧或左侧或适当的节段性肝蒂,然后使用吻合器进行横断。

结果

与大肝切除相比,小肝切除的手术时间(95. + 31.1 vs. 186.6 +/- 56.5)和离断时间(35.9 +/- 14.5 vs. 65.3 +/- 17.2)明显更短(均p < 0.001)。小肝切除的平均失血量为255.6 + 129.9 mL,大肝切除为385.7 + 200.1 mL(p = 0.003)。小肝切除患者的平均输血量为300.8 + 99.5 mL,大肝切除患者为450.9 + 89.6 mL(p = 0.067)。两组之间的发病率和死亡率无显著差异(p = 0.989;p = 0.920)。大肝切除和小肝切除均为高级别的肿瘤手术,3年总生存率无显著差异。

结论

使用CUSA离断肝实质并采用肝门部腔内切割吻合器(endo-GIA)处理Glisson蒂以及主要肝静脉是一种有效且安全的手术方法。

相似文献

2
Glissonean pedicle approach in major liver resections.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Sep;59(118):1896-901. doi: 10.5754/hge12198.
3
Vascular transection using endovascular stapling in hepatic resection.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Mar-Apr;56(90):498-500.
4
Hepatic resection using stapling devices.
Am J Surg. 2004 Feb;187(2):280-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.11.005.
6
Pre-resectional inflow vascular control: extrafascial dissection of Glissonean pedicle in liver resections.
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2014 Oct;3(5):227-37. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2014.09.09.
7
Laparoscopic bisegmentectomy 6 and 7 using a Glissonian approach and a half-Pringle maneuver.
Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1840-1. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2681-x. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
9
Laparoscopic right hepatectomy with intrahepatic transection of the right bile duct.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Feb;19(2):467-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1927-5. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
10
Extra-Glissonian approach in liver resection.
HPB (Oxford). 2010 Mar;12(2):94-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00135.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验