• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗临床医生和专家实施在线网络支持工具的影响:ECOPIH 项目。

Impact of the implementation of an online network support tool among clinicians of primary health care and specialists: ECOPIH Project.

机构信息

Centre d'Atenció Primària la Salut, Institut Català de la Salut, Passatge dels Encants s/n, 08914, Badalona, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Oct 3;14:146. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-146.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2296-14-146
PMID:24088387
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3852545/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been created an online communication tool with the objective to improve the communication among different levels of care, between Primary Care clinicians and Specialists. This tool is web 2.0 based technology (ECOPIH project). It allows to review clinical cases and to share knowledge. Our study will evaluate its impact in terms of reduction on the number of referrals to three specialties two years after the use of this tool.

METHODS/DESIGN: Open, multicenter, controlled, non random intervention study over 24 months. Study population includes 131 Primary Care Physicians assigned to nine health centers. The study will compare the clinicians that use the ECOPIH with the ones that do not use the tool. Also, professionals that start to use the tool during the period time of the study will be included.The number of annual referrals during the first and second year will be analyzed and retrospectively compared with the previous year to the implementation of the tool. Moreover, it will be assessed the level of satisfaction of the professionals with the tool and to what extend the tool responds to their needs.

DISCUSSION

The implementation of ECOPIH in the field of Primary Health Care can decrease the number of referrals from primary care to specialist care.It is expected that the reduction will be more noticeable in the group of professionals that use more intensively the tool. Furthermore, we believe that it can be also observed with the professionals that read the contributions of the others.We anticipate high degree of customer satisfaction as it is a very helpful resource never used before in our environment.

摘要

背景

为了改善不同医疗层级之间、基层医疗临床医生与专家之间的沟通,我们开发了一种在线交流工具。该工具基于网络 2.0 技术(ECOPIH 项目),可以用于回顾临床病例和分享知识。我们将评估其使用两年后,对减少向三个专科转诊数量的影响。

方法/设计:这是一项为期 24 个月的开放性、多中心、对照、非随机干预研究。研究对象包括分配到 9 个卫生中心的 131 名基层医疗临床医生。我们将比较使用 ECOPIH 的临床医生与未使用该工具的临床医生。此外,还将纳入在研究期间开始使用该工具的专业人员。将分析第一年和第二年的年度转诊数量,并与工具实施前的前一年进行回顾性比较。此外,还将评估专业人员对该工具的满意度以及该工具在多大程度上满足他们的需求。

讨论

ECOPIH 在基层医疗领域的实施可以减少从基层医疗向专科医疗的转诊数量。预计在更频繁使用该工具的专业人员中,减少的效果更为显著。此外,我们认为,对于阅读其他专业人员贡献的专业人员,也可以观察到这种效果。我们预计客户满意度会很高,因为这是我们所处环境中从未使用过的非常有用的资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8dc/3852545/756f9e458c8a/1471-2296-14-146-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8dc/3852545/67a6bf8adc2a/1471-2296-14-146-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8dc/3852545/fec37d03a9dc/1471-2296-14-146-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8dc/3852545/756f9e458c8a/1471-2296-14-146-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8dc/3852545/67a6bf8adc2a/1471-2296-14-146-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8dc/3852545/fec37d03a9dc/1471-2296-14-146-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8dc/3852545/756f9e458c8a/1471-2296-14-146-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of the implementation of an online network support tool among clinicians of primary health care and specialists: ECOPIH Project.基层医疗临床医生和专家实施在线网络支持工具的影响:ECOPIH 项目。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Oct 3;14:146. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-146.
2
Efficiency as a determinant of loyalty among users of a Community of Clinical Practice: a comparative study between the implementation and consolidation phases.临床实践社区用户忠诚度的决定因素:实施阶段与巩固阶段的对比研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jan 24;21(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-1081-x.
3
Keys to success of a community of clinical practice in primary care: a qualitative evaluation of the ECOPIH project.基层医疗临床实践社区成功的关键:ECOPIH项目的定性评估
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 May 9;19(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0739-0.
4
Effects of online palliative care training on knowledge, attitude and satisfaction of primary care physicians.在线姑息治疗培训对基层医生知识、态度和满意度的影响。
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 May 23;12:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-37.
5
Building access to specialist care through e-consultation.通过电子会诊建立获得专科护理的途径。
Open Med. 2013 Jan 8;7(1):e1-8. Print 2013.
6
Electronic consultation systems: worldwide prevalence and their impact on patient care-a systematic review.电子会诊系统:全球患病率及其对患者护理的影响——一项系统综述
Fam Pract. 2016 Jun;33(3):274-85. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw024. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
7
What makes a high-quality electronic consultation (eConsult)? A nominal group study.高质量电子咨询(eConsult)的特点是什么?一项名义群体研究。
J Telemed Telecare. 2020 May;26(4):239-247. doi: 10.1177/1357633X18822885. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
8
9
The influence of an educational internet-based intervention in the beliefs and attitudes of primary care professionals on non-specific chronic low back pain: study protocol of a mixed methods approach.基于互联网的教育干预对基层医疗专业人员关于非特异性慢性下腰痛的信念和态度的影响:混合方法研究方案。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Feb 21;20(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0919-6.
10
Initial implementation of a web-based consultation process for patients with chronic kidney disease.基于网络的慢性肾脏病患者咨询流程的初步实施。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;11(2):151-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1494.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficiency as a determinant of loyalty among users of a Community of Clinical Practice: a comparative study between the implementation and consolidation phases.临床实践社区用户忠诚度的决定因素:实施阶段与巩固阶段的对比研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jan 24;21(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-1081-x.
2
The virtual hallway consult as an effective means of continuing professional development in physiatry.虚拟走廊会诊作为物理医学与康复领域持续专业发展的一种有效手段。
Can Med Educ J. 2017 Dec 15;8(4):e60-e64. eCollection 2017 Dec.
3
Understanding the discriminant factors that influence the adoption and use of clinical communities of practice: the ECOPIH case.

本文引用的文献

1
[Practice communities 2.0 in the health professional environment].
Enferm Clin. 2011 Sep-Oct;21(5):235-7. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2011.07.005. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
2
[Social networks for teaching and learning: the case of the telemedicine laboratory].
Gac Sanit. 2011 May-Jun;25(3):254-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2010.11.008. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
3
Electronic consultation as an alternative to hospital referral for patients with chronic kidney disease: a novel application for networked electronic health records to improve the accessibility and efficiency of healthcare.电子会诊作为慢性肾病患者医院转诊的替代方案:联网电子健康记录的一种新应用,以提高医疗保健的可及性和效率。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19(5):e54. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.038984. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
理解影响临床实践社区采用和使用的判别因素:以ECOPIH为例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 10;15:373. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1036-4.
4
Improving integrated care: modelling the performance of an online community of practice.提高综合护理水平:在线实践共同体绩效模型构建。
Int J Integr Care. 2014 Mar 10;14:e007. doi: 10.5334/ijic.1200. eCollection 2014 Jan.
4
Learning and caring in communities of practice: using relationships and collective learning to improve primary care for patients with multimorbidity.在实践共同体中学习和关爱:利用关系和集体学习改善多病共存患者的初级保健。
Ann Fam Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;8(2):170-7. doi: 10.1370/afm.1056.
5
Teleconsultation service to improve healthcare in rural areas: acceptance, organizational impact and appropriateness.远程会诊服务改善农村地区的医疗服务:接受度、组织影响和适宜性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Dec 18;9:238. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-238.
6
Global health delivery 2.0: using open-access technologies for transparency and operations research.全球医疗服务 2.0:利用开放获取技术实现透明度和运营研究。
PLoS Med. 2009 Dec;6(12):e1000158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000158. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
7
[Analysis of the doubts of primary care doctors].[基层医疗医生的疑虑分析]
Aten Primaria. 2009 Nov;41(11):592-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
8
Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.跨专业协作:基于实践的干预措施对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD000072. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub2.
9
Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: a systematic review.实践社区在商业和医疗保健领域的应用:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2009 May 17;4:27. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-27.
10
Provider satisfaction with virtual specialist consultations in a family medicine department.家庭医学科医生对虚拟专科会诊的满意度。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2009 Jan-Mar;28(1):14-8. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e318196def8.