• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗临床实践社区成功的关键:ECOPIH项目的定性评估

Keys to success of a community of clinical practice in primary care: a qualitative evaluation of the ECOPIH project.

作者信息

Lacasta Tintorer David, Manresa Domínguez Josep Maria, Pujol-Rivera Enriqueta, Flayeh Beneyto Souhel, Mundet Tuduri Xavier, Saigí-Rubió Francesc

机构信息

Centre d'Atenció Primària Gran Sol, Gerència d'Àmbit d'Atenció Primària Metropolitana Nord, Institut Català de la Salut, Avinguda del Doctor Bassols, 112 - 130, 08914, Badalona, Spain.

Unitat de Suport a la Recerca Metropolitana Nord, IDIAP Jordi Gol. CAP El Maresme, Camí del Mig, 36 planta 4a, 08303, Mataró, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2018 May 9;19(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0739-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-018-0739-0
PMID:29743030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5944103/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current reality of primary care (PC) makes it essential to have telemedicine systems available to facilitate communication between care levels. Communities of practice have great potential in terms of care and education, and that is why the Online Communication Tool between Primary and Hospital Care was created. This tool enables PC and non-GP specialist care (SC) professionals to raise clinical cases for consultation and to share information. The objective of this article is to explore healthcare professionals' views on communities of clinical practice (CoCPs) and the changes that need to be made in an uncontrolled real-life setting after more than two years of use.

METHODS

A descriptive-interpretative qualitative study was conducted on a total of 29 healthcare professionals who were users and non-users of a CoCP using 2 focus groups, 3 triangular groups and 5 individual interviews. There were 18 women, 21 physicians and 8 nurses. Of the interviewees, 21 were PC professionals, 24 were users of a CoCP and 7 held managerial positions.

RESULTS

For a system of communication between PC and SC to become a tool that is habitually used and very useful, the interviewees considered that it would have to be able to find quick, effective solutions to the queries raised, based on up-to-date information that is directly applicable to daily clinical practice. Contact should be virtual - and probably collaborative - via a platform integrated into their habitual workstations and led by PC professionals. Organisational changes should be implemented to enable users to have more time in their working day to spend on the tool, and professionals should have a proactive attitude in order to make the most if its potential. It is also important to make certain technological changes, basically aimed at improving the tool's accessibility, by integrating it into habitual clinical workstations.

CONCLUSIONS

The collaborative tool that provides reliable, up-to-date information that is highly transferrable to clinical practice is valued for its effectiveness, efficiency and educational capacity. In order to make the most of its potential in terms of care and education, organisational changes and techniques are required to foster greater use.

摘要

背景

基层医疗(PC)的当前现实情况使得必须具备远程医疗系统,以促进不同医疗层级之间的沟通。实践社区在医疗和教育方面具有巨大潜力,这就是创建基层与医院医疗在线沟通工具的原因。该工具使基层医疗和非全科医生专科医疗(SC)专业人员能够提出临床病例以供咨询并共享信息。本文的目的是探讨医疗保健专业人员对临床实践社区(CoCPs)的看法,以及在两年多的使用后,在不受控制的现实环境中需要做出的改变。

方法

对总共29名医疗保健专业人员进行了一项描述性 - 解释性定性研究,这些人员是一个CoCP的使用者和非使用者,采用了2个焦点小组、3个三角小组和5次个人访谈。其中有18名女性,21名医生和8名护士。在受访者中,21名是基层医疗专业人员,24名是CoCP的使用者,7名担任管理职位。

结果

对于基层医疗和专科医疗之间的沟通系统要成为一种经常使用且非常有用的工具,受访者认为它必须能够根据直接适用于日常临床实践的最新信息,快速、有效地解决提出的问题。沟通应该通过集成到他们日常工作站中的平台进行虚拟(可能是协作式)沟通,并由基层医疗专业人员主导。应实施组织变革,以便用户在工作日有更多时间使用该工具,并且专业人员应采取积极主动的态度,以充分发挥其潜力。进行某些技术变革也很重要,主要目的是通过将其集成到日常临床工作站中来提高工具的可及性。

结论

提供可靠、最新且高度可转化为临床实践信息的协作工具,因其有效性、效率和教育能力而受到重视。为了在医疗和教育方面充分发挥其潜力,需要进行组织变革和采用相关技术以促进更多的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc7d/5944103/8e00a7e1a639/12875_2018_739_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc7d/5944103/8e00a7e1a639/12875_2018_739_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc7d/5944103/8e00a7e1a639/12875_2018_739_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Keys to success of a community of clinical practice in primary care: a qualitative evaluation of the ECOPIH project.基层医疗临床实践社区成功的关键:ECOPIH项目的定性评估
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 May 9;19(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0739-0.
2
Efficiency as a determinant of loyalty among users of a Community of Clinical Practice: a comparative study between the implementation and consolidation phases.临床实践社区用户忠诚度的决定因素:实施阶段与巩固阶段的对比研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jan 24;21(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-1081-x.
3
Understanding the discriminant factors that influence the adoption and use of clinical communities of practice: the ECOPIH case.理解影响临床实践社区采用和使用的判别因素:以ECOPIH为例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 10;15:373. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1036-4.
4
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
5
Has the quality of health care for the immigrant population changed during the economic crisis in Catalonia (Spain)? Opinions of health professionals and immigrant users.在西班牙加泰罗尼亚的经济危机期间,移民群体的医疗保健质量是否发生了变化?医疗专业人员和移民使用者的看法。
Gac Sanit. 2018 Sep-Oct;32(5):425-432. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
6
Impact of the implementation of an online network support tool among clinicians of primary health care and specialists: ECOPIH Project.基层医疗临床医生和专家实施在线网络支持工具的影响:ECOPIH 项目。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Oct 3;14:146. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-146.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
A Virtual Emergency Telemedicine Serious Game in Medical Training: A Quantitative, Professional Feedback-Informed Evaluation Study.医学培训中的虚拟应急远程医疗严肃游戏:一项基于定量、专业反馈的评估研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 17;17(6):e150. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3667.
10
Interprofessional collaboration in telemedicine for long-term care: An exploratory qualitative study.远程医疗中的跨专业协作:一项探索性定性研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Nov;55(6):1227-1237. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12925. Epub 2023 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of eHealth use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era: a systematic review.电子健康使用对大流行前普通实践工作量的影响:系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11524-9.
2
The aims and effectiveness of communities of practice in healthcare: A systematic review.实践共同体在医疗保健中的目标和效果:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 10;18(10):e0292343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292343. eCollection 2023.
3
Teleconsultation adoption since COVID-19: Comparison of barriers and facilitators in primary care settings in Hong Kong and the Netherlands.

本文引用的文献

1
How Professionals Share an E-Care Plan for the Elderly in Primary Care: Evaluating the Use of an E-Communication Tool by Different Combinations of Professionals.初级保健中专业人员如何共享老年人的电子护理计划:评估不同专业人员组合对电子通信工具的使用情况。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Nov 24;18(11):e304. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6332.
2
Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough?代码饱和度与意义饱和度:多少次访谈才算足够?
Qual Health Res. 2017 Mar;27(4):591-608. doi: 10.1177/1049732316665344. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
3
Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic referral and/or consultation systems: a qualitative study of 16 health organizations.
新冠疫情以来的远程问诊采用情况:香港和荷兰初级保健环境中的障碍和促进因素比较。
Health Policy. 2022 Oct;126(10):933-944. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.07.012. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
4
Collaborative Learning: A Qualitative Study Exploring Factors Contributing to a Successful Tobacco Cessation Train-the-Trainer Program as a Community of Practice.协作学习:一项定性研究,探索有助于成功开展以实践共同体为模式的烟草戒断培训师培训计划的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;19(13):7664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137664.
5
Assessing Determinants of Online Medical Services Adoption Willingness of General Hospital Physicians Using the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model: A Multi-Group Structural Equation Modeling Approach.运用信息-动机-行为技能模型评估综合医院医生采用在线医疗服务意愿的决定因素:多组结构方程建模方法
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Dec 21;14:3453-3462. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S346675. eCollection 2021.
6
Do People Trust in Robot-Assisted Surgery? Evidence from Europe.人们信任机器人辅助手术吗?来自欧洲的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 28;18(23):12519. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312519.
7
Factors influencing sustainability of online platforms for professionals: a mixed-method study in OECD countries.影响专业人员在线平台可持续性的因素:经合组织国家的混合方法研究。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Feb 17;37(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab063.
8
Factors Impacting Clinicians' Adoption of a Clinical Photo Documentation App and its Implications for Clinical Workflows and Quality of Care: Qualitative Case Study.影响临床医生采用临床照片文档记录应用的因素及其对临床工作流程和护理质量的影响:定性案例研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 23;8(9):e20203. doi: 10.2196/20203.
9
Correction to: Keys to success of a community of clinical practice in primary care: a qualitative evaluation of the ECOPIH project.对《初级保健临床实践社区成功的关键:ECOPIH项目的定性评估》的更正
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Apr 17;21(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01132-x.
10
Social, Organizational, and Technological Factors Impacting Clinicians' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review.社会、组织和技术因素对临床医生采用移动医疗工具的影响:系统文献回顾。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Feb 20;8(2):e15935. doi: 10.2196/15935.
实施电子转诊和/或会诊系统的促进因素和障碍:对16个卫生组织的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 19;15:568. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1233-1.
4
Understanding the discriminant factors that influence the adoption and use of clinical communities of practice: the ECOPIH case.理解影响临床实践社区采用和使用的判别因素:以ECOPIH为例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 10;15:373. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1036-4.
5
GP trainees' in-consultation information-seeking: associations with human, paper and electronic sources.全科医生培训学员会诊时的信息寻求:与人力、纸质和电子资源的关联
Fam Pract. 2015 Oct;32(5):525-32. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv047. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
6
Electronic consultations (e-consults) to improve access to specialty care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.改善专科护理可及性的电子会诊:一项系统评价与叙述性综合分析
J Telemed Telecare. 2015 Sep;21(6):323-30. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15582108. Epub 2015 May 20.
7
Clinical questions raised by clinicians at the point of care: a systematic review.临床医生在护理点提出的临床问题:系统评价。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May;174(5):710-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.368.
8
Implementing a virtual community of practice for family physician training: a mixed-methods case study.为家庭医生培训实施实践虚拟社区:一项混合方法的案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Mar 12;16(3):e83. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3083.
9
Barriers and decisions when answering clinical questions at the point of care: a grounded theory study.在护理点回答临床问题时的障碍和决策:扎根理论研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Nov 25;173(21):1962-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.10103.
10
Perceptions of family physician trainees and trainers regarding the usefulness of a virtual community of practice.家庭医生培训学员和培训师对实践虚拟社区有用性的看法。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 May 10;15(5):e92. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2555.