Suppr超能文献

当从男性到女性的骨密度参考数据切换时,对男性的治疗意义:曼尼托巴骨密度计划。

Treatment implications for men when switching from male to female bone mineral density reference data: the Manitoba Bone Density Program.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Densitom. 2013 Oct-Dec;16(4):537-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Oct 3.

Abstract

Since 2001, the International Society for Clinical Densitometry Official Position has been to use a young female normative database in women and a young male normative in men for T-scores. Several prospective studies have shown that men and women with identical hip bone mineral density (BMD) have the same fracture rates, and so there has been reconsideration of whether female reference data should be adopted for men. We studied 4691 men age 50 yr and older with baseline dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessments to explore how a change in BMD reference data from male to female would affect the number of men meeting National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) intervention criteria. We found that use of male vs female BMD reference data for T-score calculation did affect individual eligibility criteria for treatment under the NOF guidelines, but that overall differences in treatment rates were small when eligibility for treatment considered any of the NOF intervention criteria. Specifically, the majority of men who no longer qualified for treatment based upon T-scores calculated from female as opposed to male reference data would still qualify for treatment based upon other NOF intervention criteria. In addition, men only eligible for treatment under NOF criteria when using male reference data were at low fracture risk. We conclude that choice of male or female reference data for T-score calculation in men has little effect on overall treatment eligibility rates under NOF guidelines.

摘要

自 2001 年以来,国际临床密度计量学会的官方立场一直是在女性中使用年轻女性的规范数据库,在男性中使用年轻男性的规范数据库来进行 T 分数。几项前瞻性研究表明,具有相同髋部骨密度(BMD)的男性和女性具有相同的骨折率,因此重新考虑是否应该采用女性参考数据来评估男性。我们研究了 4691 名年龄在 50 岁及以上的男性,他们在基线时接受了双能 X 射线吸收法评估,以探讨将男性的 BMD 参考数据更改为女性参考数据将如何影响符合国家骨质疏松基金会(NOF)干预标准的男性人数。我们发现,使用男性与女性 BMD 参考数据进行 T 分数计算确实会影响根据 NOF 指南进行治疗的个体资格标准,但当考虑任何 NOF 干预标准时,治疗率的总体差异很小。具体来说,根据女性参考数据而非男性参考数据计算 T 分数而不再符合治疗标准的大多数男性仍将符合其他 NOF 干预标准的治疗资格。此外,仅根据男性参考数据符合 NOF 标准的男性进行治疗的骨折风险较低。我们得出的结论是,对于男性 T 分数计算中使用男性或女性参考数据的选择,对 NOF 指南下的总体治疗资格率影响不大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验