Van Tiel F H, Boere W A, Harmsen T, Benaissa-Trouw B J, Kraaijeveld C A, Snippe H
J Gen Virol. 1985 Jun;66 ( Pt 6):1353-6. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-66-6-1353.
To quantify the antiviral effect of interferon (IFN) we applied a mixture of two horseradish peroxidase-labelled monoclonal antibodies, specific for the E1 glycoprotein of Semliki Forest virus, in a direct enzyme immunoassay. This assay is suitable for detection of virus replication in L-cells, seeded as monolayers in 96-well plates. Inhibition of absorbance values caused by IFN was determined in a Flow Titertek Multiskan. Three IFN samples from different sources were titrated simultaneously in the enzyme immunoassay and in the vesicular stomatitis virus plaque reduction test in five consecutive experiments. Titres were calculated as the inverse value of the dilution of IFN causing 25% inhibition of absorbance values and 50% reduction of plaque counts respectively. The results show equality of precision and reproducibility between and within the two assays. However, the enzyme immunoassay is more convenient and objective than the plaque reduction assay.
为了量化干扰素(IFN)的抗病毒效果,我们在直接酶免疫测定中应用了两种辣根过氧化物酶标记的单克隆抗体的混合物,这两种抗体对塞姆利基森林病毒的E1糖蛋白具有特异性。该测定适用于检测接种在96孔板中作为单层培养的L细胞中的病毒复制。在Flow Titertek Multiskan中测定由IFN引起的吸光度值的抑制情况。在连续五个实验中,同时在酶免疫测定和水疱性口炎病毒蚀斑减少试验中对来自不同来源的三个IFN样品进行滴定。效价分别计算为导致吸光度值抑制25%和蚀斑计数减少50%的IFN稀释倍数的倒数。结果表明两种测定之间以及每种测定内部的精密度和重现性相当。然而,酶免疫测定比蚀斑减少测定更方便、更客观。