Espay Alberto J, Chen Robert
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2013 Oct;19(5 Movement Disorders):1264-86. doi: 10.1212/01.CON.0000436156.54532.1a.
Myoclonus remains a challenging movement phenotype to characterize, evaluate, and treat. A systematic assessment of the temporal sequence, phenomenology, and distribution of movements can assist in the rational approach to diagnosis and management.
Cortical forms of myoclonus are increasingly recognized as primarily cerebellar disorders. A syndrome of orthostatic myoclonus has been recognized by electrophysiology in patients with neurodegenerative disorders, mainly in Alzheimer disease, accounting for impairments in gait and balance previously mischaracterized as normal pressure hydrocephalus or orthostatic tremor. Tyrosine hydroxylase deficiency and Silver-Russell syndrome (uniparental disomy of chromosome 7) have been established as two novel causes of the myoclonus-dystonia syndrome. Mutations in the glycine receptor (GlyR) α1-subunit gene (GLRA1) explain the major expression of hyperekplexia, an inherited excessive startle disorder, butnewly identified mutations in GlyR β-subunit (GLRB) and glycine transporter 2 (GlyT2) genes (SLC6A5) account for "minor" forms of this disorder manifested as excessive startle and hypnic jerks. The entity previously known as palatal myoclonus has been reclassified as palatal tremor in recognition of its clinical and electromyographic features and no longer enters the differential diagnosis of myoclonic disorders. Increasing documentation of psychogenic features in patients previously characterized as having propriospinal myoclonus has cast doubts on the existence of this distinctive disorder.
Myoclonus can be a prominent manifestation of a wide range of disorders. Electrophysiologic testing aids in distinguishing myoclonus from other mimics and classifying them according to cortical, subcortical, or spinal origin, which assists the choice of treatment. Despite the lack of randomized clinical trials, levetiracetam appears most effective in patients with cortical myoclonus, whereas clonazepam remains the only first-line therapeutic option in subcortical and spinal myoclonus.
肌阵挛在特征描述、评估及治疗方面仍是具有挑战性的运动表型。对运动的时间序列、现象学及分布进行系统评估有助于合理地进行诊断和管理。
皮质型肌阵挛越来越被认为主要是小脑疾病。神经电生理学已在神经退行性疾病患者中识别出体位性肌阵挛综合征,主要见于阿尔茨海默病,这解释了先前被误诊为正常压力脑积水或体位性震颤的步态和平衡障碍。酪氨酸羟化酶缺乏症和Silver-Russell综合征(7号染色体单亲二倍体)已被确定为肌阵挛-肌张力障碍综合征的两个新病因。甘氨酸受体(GlyR)α1亚基基因(GLRA1)的突变解释了遗传性过度惊吓障碍——惊跳症的主要表现,但新发现的GlyRβ亚基(GLRB)和甘氨酸转运体2(GlyT2)基因(SLC6A5)的突变导致了该疾病的“轻微”形式,表现为过度惊吓和入睡抽动。先前被称为腭肌阵挛的疾病已根据其临床和肌电图特征重新分类为腭震颤,不再列入肌阵挛性疾病的鉴别诊断。越来越多的证据表明,先前被诊断为脊髓性肌阵挛的患者存在精神性特征,这使人对这种独特疾病的存在产生怀疑。
肌阵挛可能是多种疾病的突出表现。电生理检查有助于将肌阵挛与其他类似症状区分开来,并根据其皮质、皮质下或脊髓起源进行分类,这有助于选择治疗方法。尽管缺乏随机临床试验,但左乙拉西坦似乎对皮质型肌阵挛患者最有效,而氯硝西泮仍然是皮质下和脊髓性肌阵挛的唯一一线治疗选择。