• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

灵活剂量-时间美沙酮脱毒方案的治疗结果预测因子。

Treatment outcome predictors in flexible dose-duration methadone detoxification program.

机构信息

1)Neurocognitive Laboratory, Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 4)Translational Neuroscience Program, Institute for Cognitive Sciences Studies, Tehran,

出版信息

Arch Iran Med. 2013 Oct;16(10):599-601.

PMID:24093142
Abstract

Methadone detoxification is among the widely used treatment programs for opioid dependence. The aims of this study were to identify which patient baseline factors and treatment regimen features are predictors of the treatment outcome in an outpatient flexible dose-duration methadone detoxification program.  We studied 126 opioid dependents in a naturalistic nonexperimental clinical setting. The patients were assessed for baseline demographic characteristics, and drug abuse characteristics. Treatment regimen features were recorded during the program. Successful treatment completion was defined as the last daily dose of methadone being less than 15 mg, negative urine analysis in the last two weeks of treatment, and based on the final clinician-client's decision.  Out of 126 patients, 60 patients completed detoxification successfully. Younger age, longer duration of the opioid abuse, and higher subjective opiate intoxication severity before treatment entry were all significantly associated with negative treatment outcome. Among treatment regimen features, higher maximum methadone dose had a marginally significant independent effect on treatment failure. Patients with maximum methadone dose of more than 75 mg per day had around ten times worse success rate when compared to those who received lesser doses. The study findings could be used to predict treatment outcome and prognosis in a more individualized and patient-tailored approach in the real clinical setting. Guideline development for treatment selection and outcome monitoring in addiction medicine based on similar studies could enhance treatment outcome in clinical services.

摘要

美沙酮脱毒治疗是广泛应用于阿片类药物依赖治疗的方案之一。本研究旨在确定门诊灵活剂量-时间美沙酮脱毒方案中哪些患者基线因素和治疗方案特征是治疗结果的预测因素。我们在自然的非实验临床环境中研究了 126 名阿片类药物依赖者。对患者进行基线人口统计学特征和药物滥用特征评估。在治疗过程中记录治疗方案特征。成功完成治疗定义为最后一天的美沙酮剂量小于 15mg,治疗最后两周的尿液分析呈阴性,并且基于最终临床医生和患者的决定。在 126 名患者中,60 名成功完成了脱毒治疗。年龄较小、阿片类药物滥用时间较长以及治疗前主观阿片类药物中毒严重程度较高,与不良治疗结果显著相关。在治疗方案特征中,美沙酮最大剂量越高,治疗失败的独立影响越显著。与接受较小剂量美沙酮的患者相比,每日最大剂量超过 75mg 的患者的成功率要低十倍左右。这些研究结果可用于在真实临床环境中更个体化和针对患者的方法预测治疗结果和预后。基于类似研究的成瘾医学治疗选择和结果监测指南的制定,可以提高临床服务中的治疗效果。

相似文献

1
Treatment outcome predictors in flexible dose-duration methadone detoxification program.灵活剂量-时间美沙酮脱毒方案的治疗结果预测因子。
Arch Iran Med. 2013 Oct;16(10):599-601.
2
Detoxification of opiate addicts with multiple drug abuse: a comparison of buprenorphine vs. methadone.多种药物滥用的阿片类成瘾者的脱毒治疗:丁丙诺啡与美沙酮的比较。
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2002 Sep;35(5):159-64. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34115.
3
Factors affecting the outcome of methadone maintenance treatment in opiate dependence.影响阿片类物质依赖者美沙酮维持治疗效果的因素。
Ir Med J. 2007 Mar;100(3):393-7.
4
Cost and cost-effectiveness of standard methadone maintenance treatment compared to enriched 180-day methadone detoxification.与强化180天美沙酮脱毒治疗相比,标准美沙酮维持治疗的成本及成本效益
Addiction. 2004 Jun;99(6):718-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00728.x.
5
Influence of the dose on the severity of opiate withdrawal symptoms during methadone detoxification.美沙酮脱毒期间剂量对阿片类药物戒断症状严重程度的影响。
Pharmacology. 2008;81(2):92-6. doi: 10.1159/000109982. Epub 2007 Oct 19.
6
In-patient detoxification procedures, treatment retention, and post-treatment opiate use: comparison of lofexidine + naloxone, lofexidine + placebo, and methadone.住院戒毒程序、治疗留存率及治疗后阿片类药物使用情况:洛非西定+纳洛酮、洛非西定+安慰剂与美沙酮的比较
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Apr 17;88(1):91-5. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.09.020. Epub 2006 Oct 24.
7
Multimodal drug addiction treatment: a field comparison of methadone and buprenorphine among heroin- and cocaine-dependent patients.多模式药物成瘾治疗:海洛因和可卡因依赖患者中美沙酮与丁丙诺啡的实地比较
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006 Jul;31(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.03.007.
8
A randomized, open-label trial comparing methadone and Levo-Alpha-Acetylmethadol (LAAM) in maintenance treatment of opioid addiction.一项比较美沙酮和左-α-乙酰美沙朵(LAAM)用于阿片类药物成瘾维持治疗的随机开放标签试验。
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2009 Jan;42(1):1-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1083818. Epub 2009 Jan 19.
9
Predictors of outcome in LAAM, buprenorphine, and methadone treatment for opioid dependence.LAAM、丁丙诺啡和美沙酮治疗阿片类药物依赖的疗效预测因素。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005 Nov;13(4):293-302. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.13.4.293.
10
Comparison of buprenorphine and methadone in the treatment of opiate withdrawal: possible advantages of buprenorphine for the treatment of opiate-benzodiazepine codependent patients?丁丙诺啡与美沙酮治疗阿片类戒断反应的比较:丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类 - 苯二氮䓬类药物依赖患者的潜在优势?
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Apr;27(2):188-92. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e318032ec2a.

引用本文的文献

1
Baseline characteristics of patients predicting suitability for rapid naltrexone induction.预测快速纳曲酮诱导适用性的患者基线特征。
Am J Addict. 2015 Apr;24(3):258-264. doi: 10.1111/ajad.12180.
2
Discontinuation of buprenorphine maintenance therapy: perspectives and outcomes.丁丙诺啡维持治疗的中断:观点与结果
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 May;52:48-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.12.011. Epub 2014 Dec 30.