• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

空心锁定螺钉与非空心皮质锁定螺钉轴向负荷的生物力学比较。

Biomechanical comparison of axial load between cannulated locking screws and noncannulated cortical locking screws.

作者信息

Yang Shan-Wei, Kuo Shyh Ming, Chang Shwu Jen, Su Tian-Shiang, Chen Hsiang-Ho, Renn Jenn-Huei, Lin Ting-Sheng

出版信息

Orthopedics. 2013 Oct 1;36(10):e1316-21. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130920-26.

DOI:10.3928/01477447-20130920-26
PMID:24093710
Abstract

The goal of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability of cannulated locking screws and noncannulated cortical locking screws in a periarticular locking plate. Twelve fresh-frozen porcine tibias with a 1-cm gap created distal to the tibial plateau were used to simulate an unstable proximal tibial fracture. All specimens were fixed with a periarticular proximal lateral tibial locking plate and divided into 2 groups based on whether the proximal metaphyseal screw holes of the plate were inserted with either cannulated locking screws or noncannulated cortical locking screws. An axial compressive load was applied to cause failure in each specimen using a materials testing instrument. The axial stiffness and maximum failure strength in axial loading were recorded. Axial stiffness of the constructs using noncannulated cortical locking screw was significantly higher than that of the constructs using cannulated locking screws (P=.006). Axial failure strength of the constructs using noncannulated cortical locking screw was significantly higher than that of the constructs using cannulated locking screws (P=.002). The failure mode observed in all specimens was a permanent screw-bending deformity over the head-shaft junction of proximal metaphyseal screws, irrespective of whether they were cannulated or noncannulated cortical locking screws. Fixation with noncannulated cortical locking screws offered more stability than cannulated locking screws with regard to axial stiffness and failure strength in a porcine model with unstable proximal tibial fractures.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较空心锁定螺钉和非空心皮质锁定螺钉在关节周围锁定钢板中的生物力学稳定性。使用12根新鲜冷冻的猪胫骨,在胫骨平台远端制造1厘米的间隙,以模拟不稳定的胫骨近端骨折。所有标本均用关节周围近端外侧胫骨锁定钢板固定,并根据钢板近端干骺端螺钉孔插入的是空心锁定螺钉还是非空心皮质锁定螺钉分为两组。使用材料测试仪器对每个标本施加轴向压缩载荷以导致失效。记录轴向加载时的轴向刚度和最大失效强度。使用非空心皮质锁定螺钉的结构的轴向刚度显著高于使用空心锁定螺钉的结构(P = 0.006)。使用非空心皮质锁定螺钉的结构的轴向失效强度显著高于使用空心锁定螺钉的结构(P = 0.002)。在所有标本中观察到的失效模式是近端干骺端螺钉头-干交界处的永久性螺钉弯曲变形,无论它们是空心还是非空心皮质锁定螺钉。在不稳定的胫骨近端骨折猪模型中,就轴向刚度和失效强度而言,使用非空心皮质锁定螺钉固定比空心锁定螺钉提供了更高的稳定性。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical comparison of axial load between cannulated locking screws and noncannulated cortical locking screws.空心锁定螺钉与非空心皮质锁定螺钉轴向负荷的生物力学比较。
Orthopedics. 2013 Oct 1;36(10):e1316-21. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130920-26.
2
Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial and uniaxial locking plate fixation in a proximal tibial gap model.在胫骨近端间隙模型中对多轴锁定钢板和单轴锁定钢板固定的生物力学比较。
J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Aug;23(7):507-13. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181a25368.
3
Suture versus screw fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures: a biomechanical comparison.移位性胫骨髁间棘骨折的缝线与螺钉固定:生物力学比较
Arthroscopy. 2005 Oct;21(10):1172-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.06.019.
4
Effect of distal interlocking screw number and position after intramedullary nailing of distal tibial fractures: a biomechanical study simulating immediate weight-bearing.胫骨干骺端骨折髓内钉固定术后远端交锁螺钉数量及位置的影响:一项模拟早期负重的生物力学研究
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Feb;29(2):98-104. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000195.
5
Biomechanical strength of the Peri-Loc proximal tibial plate: a comparison of all-locked versus hybrid locked/nonlocked screw configurations.Peri-Loc胫骨近端钢板的生物力学强度:全锁定与混合锁定/非锁定螺钉配置的比较。
J Orthop Trauma. 2008 May-Jun;22(5):312-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31817279b8.
6
Number and locations of screw fixation for volar fixed-angle plating of distal radius fractures: biomechanical study.桡骨远端骨折掌侧锁定钢板螺钉固定的数量及位置:生物力学研究
J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Jun;35(6):885-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.03.027.
7
Comparison of augmentation methods for internal fixation of osteoporotic ankle fractures.骨质疏松性踝关节骨折内固定增强方法的比较
Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Jul;30(7):696-703. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0696.
8
Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.锁定螺钉在肱骨干骨折钢板固定中是否具有优势?对合成骨和尸体骨的生物力学分析。
J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(10):709-15. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31818df8cb.
9
Biomechanical comparison of bicortical versus unicortical screw placement of proximal tibia locking plates: a cadaveric model.胫骨近端锁定钢板双皮质与单皮质螺钉置入的生物力学比较:尸体模型研究
J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Jul;22(6):399-403. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318178417e.
10
Fixation of a split fracture of the lateral tibial plateau with a locking screw plate instead of cannulated screws would allow early weight bearing: a computational exploration.使用锁定钢板而非空心螺钉固定胫骨外侧平台劈裂骨折可允许早期负重:一项计算机模拟研究
Int Orthop. 2016 Oct;40(10):2163-2169. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3106-y. Epub 2016 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The Incidence of Screw Failure in Fenestrated Polyaxial Pedicle Screws vs. Conventional Pedicle Screws in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS).在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)治疗中,开窗多轴椎弓根螺钉与传统椎弓根螺钉的螺钉失败发生率比较
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 19;13(6):1760. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061760.
2
Use of Cannulated Screws for Primary Latarjet Procedures.空心螺钉在初次Latarjet手术中的应用。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Aug 25;10(8):23259671221117802. doi: 10.1177/23259671221117802. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Effect of different inner core diameters on structural strength of cannulated pedicle screws under various lumbar spine movements.
不同内芯直径对腰椎不同运动状态下空心椎弓根螺钉结构强度的影响。
Biomed Eng Online. 2017 Aug 15;16(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12938-017-0392-1.
4
Latarjet Fixation: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study Evaluating Cortical and Cannulated Screw Fixation.Latarjet 固定术:一项评估皮质骨和空心螺钉固定的尸体生物力学研究。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Apr 19;4(4):2325967116643533. doi: 10.1177/2325967116643533. eCollection 2016 Apr.