• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

追求有效的继续教育信息评估方法：混合方法研究。

In pursuit of a valid Information Assessment Method for continuing education: a mixed methods study.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Côte-des-neiges, 3rd Floor, Suite 300, Montreal, QC H3S 1Z1, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2013 Oct 7;13:137. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-137.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-13-137
PMID:24094046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3842783/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Information Assessment Method (IAM) is a popular tool for continuing education and knowledge translation. After a search for information, the IAM allows the health professional to report what was the search objective, its cognitive impact, as well as any use and patient health benefit associated with the retrieved health information. In continuing education programs, professionals read health information, rate it using the IAM, and earn continuing education credit for this brief individual reflective learning activity. IAM items have been iteratively developed using literature reviews and qualitative studies. Thus, our research question was: what is the content validity of IAM items from the users' perspective?

METHODS

A two-step content validation study was conducted. In Step 1, we followed a mixed methods research design, and assessed the relevance and representativeness of IAM items. In this step, data from a longitudinal quantitative study and a qualitative multiple case study involving 40 family physicians were analyzed. In Step 2, IAM items were analyzed and modified based on a set of guiding principles by a multi-disciplinary expert panel.

RESULTS

The content validity of 16 IAM items was supported, and these items were not changed. Nine other items were modified. Three new items were added, including two that were extensions of an existing item.

CONCLUSION

A content validated version of the IAM (IAM 2011) is available for the continuing education of health professionals.

摘要

背景

信息评估方法（IAM）是一种用于继续教育和知识转化的流行工具。在搜索信息后，IAM 允许卫生专业人员报告搜索目标、其认知影响，以及与检索到的健康信息相关的任何使用和患者健康益处。在继续教育计划中，专业人员阅读健康信息，使用 IAM 对其进行评分，并为这种简短的个人反思学习活动获得继续教育学分。IAM 项目是使用文献回顾和定性研究逐步开发的。因此，我们的研究问题是：从用户的角度来看，IAM 项目的内容效度如何？

方法

进行了两步内容验证研究。在步骤 1 中，我们采用混合方法研究设计，评估了 IAM 项目的相关性和代表性。在这一步，对一项涉及 40 名家庭医生的纵向定量研究和一项定性多案例研究的数据进行了分析。在步骤 2 中，多学科专家小组根据一套指导原则对 IAM 项目进行了分析和修改。

结果

16 个 IAM 项目的内容效度得到支持，这些项目没有更改。其他九个项目进行了修改。增加了三个新项目，其中两个是现有项目的扩展。

结论

现有的 IAM （IAM 2011）版本具有内容有效性，可用于卫生专业人员的继续教育。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b9/3842783/48dedebff384/1472-6920-13-137-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b9/3842783/474912b579b1/1472-6920-13-137-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b9/3842783/4356286eb3b3/1472-6920-13-137-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b9/3842783/48dedebff384/1472-6920-13-137-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b9/3842783/474912b579b1/1472-6920-13-137-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b9/3842783/4356286eb3b3/1472-6920-13-137-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3b9/3842783/48dedebff384/1472-6920-13-137-3.jpg

相似文献

1
In pursuit of a valid Information Assessment Method for continuing education: a mixed methods study.追求有效的继续教育信息评估方法：混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Oct 7;13:137. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-137.
2
When Educational Material Is Delivered: A Mixed Methods Content Validation Study of the Information Assessment Method.教育材料的交付时间：信息评估方法的混合方法内容效度研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2017 Mar 14;3(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/mededu.6415.
3
Feasibility of a knowledge translation CME program: Courriels Cochrane.继续医学教育知识转化项目的可行性：Cochrane通讯
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012 Spring;32(2):134-41. doi: 10.1002/chp.21136.
4
Ecological content validation of the Information Assessment Method for parents (IAM-parent): A mixed methods study.家长信息评估方法（IAM-家长版）的生态内容效度：一项混合方法研究。
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Feb;66:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
5
Evaluation of email alerts in practice: Part 2. Validation of the information assessment method.实践中电子邮件警报的评估：第 2 部分。信息评估方法的验证。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;16(6):1236-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01313.x. Epub 2010 Aug 15.
6
Assessing and Improving the Use of Online Information About Child Development, Education, Health, and Well-Being in Low-Education, Low-Income Parents: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Multiphase Study.评估并改善低教育水平、低收入父母对儿童发展、教育、健康及幸福相关在线信息的使用：一项混合方法多阶段研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Nov 20;7(11):e186. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9996.
7
[The quality of CME questions as a component part of continuing medical education--an empirical study].[继续医学教育组成部分的继续医学教育问题质量——一项实证研究]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2007;101(10):667-73. doi: 10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.11.005.
8
Multiple choice questions for continuing education in family medicine.家庭医学继续教育的多项选择题。
J Fam Pract. 1981 Dec;13(7):1031-5.
9
Development of a patient-reported outcome measure for psychotherapeutic interventions in people with seizures: A mixed methods study.开发一种针对癫痫患者心理治疗干预的患者报告结局测量工具：混合方法研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Oct;99:106464. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106464. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
10
Physician assessments of the value of therapeutic information delivered via e-mail.医生对通过电子邮件传递的治疗信息价值的评估。
Can Fam Physician. 2014 May;60(5):e258-62.

引用本文的文献

1
When Educational Material Is Delivered: A Mixed Methods Content Validation Study of the Information Assessment Method.教育材料的交付时间：信息评估方法的混合方法内容效度研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2017 Mar 14;3(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/mededu.6415.

本文引用的文献

1
Physician assessments of the value of therapeutic information delivered via e-mail.医生对通过电子邮件传递的治疗信息价值的评估。
Can Fam Physician. 2014 May;60(5):e258-62.
2
"Better-than-best" evidence? Using family physicians' feedback for 2-way knowledge translation.“优于最佳”的证据？利用家庭医生的反馈进行双向知识转化。
Can Fam Physician. 2014 May;60(5):415-7.
3
An online knowledge resource and questionnaires as a continuing pharmacy education tool to document reflective learning.在线知识资源和问卷作为继续教育工具，用于记录反思性学习。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Jun 18;76(5):82. doi: 10.5688/ajpe76582.
4
Feasibility of a knowledge translation CME program: Courriels Cochrane.继续医学教育知识转化项目的可行性：Cochrane通讯
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012 Spring;32(2):134-41. doi: 10.1002/chp.21136.
5
Impact of knowledge resources linked to an electronic health record on frequency of unnecessary tests and treatments.与电子健康记录相关的知识资源对不必要检查和治疗频率的影响。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012 Spring;32(2):108-15. doi: 10.1002/chp.21133.
6
Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies.混合方法研究中整合数据的三种技术。
BMJ. 2010 Sep 17;341:c4587. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4587.
7
A reflective learning framework to evaluate CME effects on practice reflection.一个用于评估继续医学教育对实践反思影响的反思性学习框架。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2010 Spring;30(2):78-88. doi: 10.1002/chp.20063.
8
Impact of research-based synopses delivered as daily e-mail: a prospective observational study.以每日电子邮件形式发送的基于研究的概要的影响：一项前瞻性观察性研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Mar-Apr;15(2):240-5. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2563. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
9
Seven reasons why health professionals search clinical information-retrieval technology (CIRT): toward an organizational model.医疗专业人员搜索临床信息检索技术（CIRT）的七个原因：构建一种组织模式。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Feb;13(1):39-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00646.x.
10
Impact of clinical information-retrieval technology on physicians: a literature review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies.临床信息检索技术对医生的影响：定量、定性及混合方法研究的文献综述
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Sep;74(9):745-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.05.004.