• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗专业人员搜索临床信息检索技术(CIRT)的七个原因:构建一种组织模式。

Seven reasons why health professionals search clinical information-retrieval technology (CIRT): toward an organizational model.

作者信息

Pluye Pierre, Grad Roland M, Dawes Martin, Bartlett Joan C

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Feb;13(1):39-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00646.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00646.x
PMID:17286722
Abstract

RATIONALE AND AIM

Clinical Information-Retrieval Technology (CIRT) is increasingly used, for example in accessing drug databases. However, no comprehensive framework exists to understand why health professionals search for information using CIRT. The present article aims to propose such organizational framework.

BACKGROUND

Our literature review suggests six reasons, of which three refer to cognitive objectives (C1, C2, C3) and three to organizational objectives (O1, O2, O3): (C1) to answer-solve-support a clinical question-problem-decision; (C2) to fulfil an educational-research objective; (C3) to search in general or for curiosity; (O1) to share information with patients; (O2) to exchange information with other health professionals; (O3) to plan-manage-monitor tasks with other health professionals.

METHODS

The case study examined the use and impact of the InfoRetriever software on handheld computers in a Canadian family practice centre. Using the Critical Incident Technique, six family doctors were interviewed on specific events. A thematic analysis assigned extracts of interviews to reasons for use.

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION

Findings illustrate the six reasons, and suggest a seventh reason that refers to a cognitive objective, namely (C4) to overcome the limits of health professional memory. These seven reasons are interpreted according to the literature on information science and organization studies, which suggest ordering reasons at three levels of stimulation of learning and knowledge: none (objective not achieved), moderate (cognitive objective achieved), and high (organizational objective achieved). This paves the way toward a new evaluation of relevance of CIRT in everyday practice (judgement based on professionals' objective achievement) using an organizational model of information-retrieving processes.

摘要

原理与目标

临床信息检索技术(CIRT)的应用越来越广泛,例如用于访问药物数据库。然而,目前尚无全面的框架来理解健康专业人员为何使用CIRT检索信息。本文旨在提出这样一个组织框架。

背景

我们的文献综述提出了六个原因,其中三个涉及认知目标(C1、C2、C3),三个涉及组织目标(O1、O2、O3):(C1)回答/解决/支持临床问题/难题/决策;(C2)实现教育/研究目标;(C3)一般性搜索或出于好奇心搜索;(O1)与患者分享信息;(O2)与其他健康专业人员交流信息;(O3)与其他健康专业人员计划/管理/监控任务。

方法

该案例研究考察了InfoRetriever软件在加拿大家庭医疗中心的手持计算机上的使用情况及影响。采用关键事件技术,对六位家庭医生就具体事件进行了访谈。通过主题分析将访谈摘录归类为使用原因。

研究结果与结论

研究结果阐明了这六个原因,并提出了第七个涉及认知目标的原因,即(C4)克服健康专业人员记忆的局限性。根据信息科学和组织研究的文献对这七个原因进行了解释,这些文献建议在学习和知识激发的三个层面上对原因进行排序:无(目标未实现)、适度(认知目标实现)和高度(组织目标实现)。这为使用信息检索过程的组织模型对CIRT在日常实践中的相关性进行新的评估(基于专业人员目标实现的判断)铺平了道路。

相似文献

1
Seven reasons why health professionals search clinical information-retrieval technology (CIRT): toward an organizational model.医疗专业人员搜索临床信息检索技术(CIRT)的七个原因:构建一种组织模式。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Feb;13(1):39-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00646.x.
2
How information retrieval technology may impact on physician practice: an organizational case study in family medicine.信息检索技术如何影响医生的实践:家庭医学中的一项组织案例研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 Aug;10(3):413-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2004.00498.x.
3
Systematically assessing the situational relevance of electronic knowledge resources: a mixed methods study.系统评估电子知识资源的情境相关性:一项混合方法研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):616-25. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2203. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
4
Assessing the impact of clinical information-retrieval technology in a family practice residency.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2005 Dec;11(6):576-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00594.x.
5
Impact of clinical information-retrieval technology on physicians: a literature review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies.临床信息检索技术对医生的影响:定量、定性及混合方法研究的文献综述
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Sep;74(9):745-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.05.004.
6
Web-based PDA downloads for clinical practice guidelines and decision support tools.基于网络的个人数字助理临床实践指南和决策支持工具下载。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2003 Winter;22(4):57-64. doi: 10.1300/J115v22n04_06.
7
Learning from research on the information behaviour of healthcare professionals: a review of the literature 2004-2008 with a focus on emotion.从医疗保健专业人员信息行为研究中学习:2004 - 2008年文献综述,重点关注情感
Health Info Libr J. 2009 Sep;26(3):171-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00860.x.
8
The attitudes of health care staff to information technology: a comprehensive review of the research literature.医护人员对信息技术的态度:研究文献综述
Health Info Libr J. 2008 Jun;25(2):81-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2008.00777.x.
9
Online on-the-spot searching increases use of evidence during consultations in family practice.在家庭医疗会诊期间,在线即时检索可增加证据的使用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Sep;68(1):61-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 May 30.
10
Value of wireless personal digital assistants for practice: perceptions of advanced practice nurses.无线个人数字助理在实践中的价值:高级执业护士的看法。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Aug;17(16):2146-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02351.x.

引用本文的文献

1
In pursuit of a valid Information Assessment Method for continuing education: a mixed methods study.追求有效的继续教育信息评估方法:混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Oct 7;13:137. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-137.
2
Do family physicians retrieve synopses of clinical research previously read as email alerts?家庭医生会检索他们之前作为电子邮件提醒阅读过的临床研究摘要吗?
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 30;13(4):e101. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1683.
3
Factors motivating and affecting health information exchange usage.促进和影响健康信息交换使用的因素。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):143-9. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004812. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
4
Health information exchange and healthcare utilization.健康信息交换与医疗保健利用。
J Med Syst. 2009 Jun;33(3):223-31. doi: 10.1007/s10916-008-9183-3.
5
Systematically assessing the situational relevance of electronic knowledge resources: a mixed methods study.系统评估电子知识资源的情境相关性:一项混合方法研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):616-25. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2203. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
6
Cognitive impact assessment of electronic knowledge resources: a mixed methods evaluation study of a handheld prototype.电子知识资源的认知影响评估:一项关于手持原型的混合方法评估研究
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:634-8.
7
A new impact assessment method to evaluate knowledge resources.一种评估知识资源的新影响评估方法。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:609-13.