• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对 N1 期鼻咽癌患者对侧下颈部省略照射的可行性。

The feasibility of omitting irradiation to the contralateral lower neck in stage N1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center of Fudan University, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol. 2013 Oct 4;8:230. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-230.

DOI:10.1186/1748-717X-8-230
PMID:24094078
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3854105/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to analyze the feasibility of omitting irradiation to the contralateral lower neck in stage N1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From July 2008 to January 2012, 52 patients with stage N1 NPC were analyzed. All patients were treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and received bilateral upper neck irradiation to levels II, III and VA and ipsilateral lower neck irradiation to levels IV and VB. The contralateral lower neck irradiation was omitted.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 29 months (range, 12-52 months). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate, progress-free survival (PFS), local failure-free (LFS), nodal recurrence-free survival (NFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 92.2%, 94.1%, 94.3%, 98% and 94.1%, respectively. Only one patient developed a neck recurrence in the irradiation field, while no patients experienced out-of-field nodal recurrence. Univariate analysis suggested that T classification was the only significant prognostic factor for overall survival, and age was significantly associated with PFS. Multivariate analyses indicated that age was also a predictor for overall survival. The elective neck irradiation procedure was not a significant predictor for all of the treatment results.

CONCLUSION

Selective irradiation to bilateral levels of II, III and VA and unilateral levels of IV and VB, omitted the contralateral lower neck in a proportion of patients with N1 stage NPC was safe and practicable.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析省略对 N1 期鼻咽癌(NPC)患者对侧下颈部照射的可行性。

材料与方法

2008 年 7 月至 2012 年 1 月,分析了 52 例 N1 期 NPC 患者。所有患者均接受调强放疗(IMRT),双侧上颈部照射至 II、III 和 VA 水平,同侧下颈部照射至 IV 和 VB 水平。对侧下颈部照射被省略。

结果

中位随访时间为 29 个月(范围 12-52 个月)。3 年总生存率(OS)、无进展生存率(PFS)、局部无失败生存率(LFS)、淋巴结无复发生存率(NFS)和远处无转移生存率(DMFS)分别为 92.2%、94.1%、94.3%、98%和 94.1%。仅有 1 例患者在照射野内出现颈部复发,无患者出现野外淋巴结复发。单因素分析表明,T 分类是影响总生存率的唯一显著预后因素,而年龄与 PFS 显著相关。多因素分析表明,年龄也是总生存率的预测因素。选择性颈淋巴结照射方案不是所有治疗结果的显著预测因素。

结论

对于 N1 期 NPC 患者,选择性双侧 II、III 和 VA 水平以及单侧 IV 和 VB 水平照射,对一部分患者省略对侧下颈部照射是安全可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad02/3854105/ce89eee35653/1748-717X-8-230-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad02/3854105/ce89eee35653/1748-717X-8-230-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad02/3854105/ce89eee35653/1748-717X-8-230-1.jpg

相似文献

1
The feasibility of omitting irradiation to the contralateral lower neck in stage N1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.对 N1 期鼻咽癌患者对侧下颈部省略照射的可行性。
Radiat Oncol. 2013 Oct 4;8:230. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-230.
2
Results of a phase 2 study examining the effects of omitting elective neck irradiation to nodal levels IV and Vb in patients with N(0-1) nasopharyngeal carcinoma.一项 2 期研究的结果,该研究旨在探讨在 N(0-1)期鼻咽癌患者中省略颈部 IV 和 Vb 水平的选择性颈部照射的效果。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Mar 15;85(4):929-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.2356. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
3
Comparative study on prophylactic irradiation to the whole neck and to the upper neck for patients with neck lymph node-negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma.颈部淋巴结阴性鼻咽癌患者全颈与上颈预防性照射的比较研究
Head Neck. 2014 May;36(5):687-93. doi: 10.1002/hed.23359. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
4
Treatment outcome of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with retropharyngeal lymph nodes metastasis only and the feasibility of elective neck irradiation.仅伴有咽后淋巴结转移的鼻咽癌治疗转归及选择性颈淋巴结照射的可行性。
Oral Oncol. 2012 Oct;48(10):1045-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.04.011. Epub 2012 May 24.
5
The feasibility of contralateral lower neck sparing intensity modulation radiated therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with unilateral cervical lymph node involvement.对单侧颈部淋巴结受累的鼻咽癌患者进行对侧下颈部 sparing 调强放射治疗的可行性。
Oral Oncol. 2017 Jun;69:68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
6
The feasibility analysis of omission of elective irradiation to level IB lymph nodes in low-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on the 2013 updated consensus guideline for neck nodal levels.基于2013年更新的颈部淋巴结分区共识指南,对低危鼻咽癌患者省略IB区淋巴结选择性照射的可行性分析
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Aug 18;12(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0869-x.
7
Incidence of small lymph node metastases in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Clinical implications for prognosis and treatment.鼻咽癌患者小淋巴结转移的发生率:对预后和治疗的临床意义
Head Neck. 2017 Feb;39(2):305-310. doi: 10.1002/hed.24586. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
8
Tumor volume is an independent prognostic indicator of local control in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.肿瘤体积是调强放疗治疗鼻咽癌患者局部控制的独立预后指标。
Radiat Oncol. 2013 Sep 5;8:208. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-208.
9
Involvement of both cervical lymph nodes and retropharyngeal lymph nodes has prognostic value for N1 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.颈淋巴结和咽后淋巴结均受累对鼻咽癌N1期患者具有预后价值。
Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jan 6;9:7. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-7.
10
Effects of omitting elective neck irradiation to nodal Level IB in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with negative Level IB lymph nodes treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a Phase 2 study.调强放疗治疗 IB 区淋巴结阴性的鼻咽癌患者时省略选择性颈部 IB 区照射的效果:一项 2 期研究
Br J Radiol. 2016 Sep;89(1065):20150621. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150621. Epub 2016 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Status and Future Directions of Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Carcinoma.头颈部癌质子治疗的现状与未来方向
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 30;16(11):2085. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112085.
2
Distribution of regional lymph lode metastasis in unilateral nasopharyngeal carcinoma and the suggestions for selective prophylactic irradiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.单侧鼻咽癌区域淋巴结转移分布及调强放疗选择性预防照射的建议。
Cancer Med. 2023 Nov;12(21):20511-20520. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6614. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
3
Lower-Neck Sparing Using Proton Therapy in Patients with Uninvolved Neck Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Is It Safe?

本文引用的文献

1
Results of a phase 2 study examining the effects of omitting elective neck irradiation to nodal levels IV and Vb in patients with N(0-1) nasopharyngeal carcinoma.一项 2 期研究的结果,该研究旨在探讨在 N(0-1)期鼻咽癌患者中省略颈部 IV 和 Vb 水平的选择性颈部照射的效果。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Mar 15;85(4):929-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.2356. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
2
Lymph node metastasis in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma treated with IMRT/3D-CRT.调强放疗/三维适形放疗治疗鼻窦鳞状细胞癌的淋巴结转移。
Oral Oncol. 2013 Jan;49(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
3
Treatment outcome of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with retropharyngeal lymph nodes metastasis only and the feasibility of elective neck irradiation.
未累及颈部的鼻咽癌患者采用质子治疗保留下颈部:安全吗?
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 9;11(12):3297. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123297.
4
Verification of the Efficacy of New Diagnostic Criteria for Retropharyngeal Nodes in a Cohort of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients.验证新的咽后淋巴结诊断标准在鼻咽癌患者队列中的疗效。
Int J Med Sci. 2021 Aug 13;18(15):3463-3469. doi: 10.7150/ijms.58375. eCollection 2021.
5
Contralateral Lower Neck Sparing Radiotherapy in Stage N1 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Long-Term Survival Outcomes and Late Toxicities.N1期鼻咽癌对侧下颈部保留放疗:长期生存结果和晚期毒性
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 25;11:628919. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.628919. eCollection 2021.
6
Feasibility of ipsilateral lower neck sparing irradiation for unilateral or bilateral neck node-negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma: systemic review and meta-analysis of 2, 521 patients.单侧或双侧颈部淋巴结阴性鼻咽癌同侧下颈部免于照射的可行性:2521 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Aug 6;13(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1087-x.
7
Practice patterns for the radical treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer by head and neck oncologists in the United Kingdom.英国头颈肿瘤学家对鼻咽癌进行根治性治疗的实践模式。
Br J Radiol. 2018 May;91(1085):20170590. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170590. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
仅伴有咽后淋巴结转移的鼻咽癌治疗转归及选择性颈淋巴结照射的可行性。
Oral Oncol. 2012 Oct;48(10):1045-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.04.011. Epub 2012 May 24.
4
Patterns of regional lymph node metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis of clinical evidence.鼻咽癌区域淋巴结转移模式:临床证据的荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Mar 21;12:98. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-98.
5
Addition of bevacizumab to standard chemoradiation for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RTOG 0615): a phase 2 multi-institutional trial.添加贝伐珠单抗到标准放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌(RTOG 0615):一项 2 期多机构试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Feb;13(2):172-80. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70303-5. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
6
Treatment outcomes for different subgroups of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.采用调强放射治疗的鼻咽癌患者不同亚组的治疗结果。
Chin J Cancer. 2011 Aug;30(8):565-73. doi: 10.5732/cjc.010.10547.
7
Long-term outcomes of early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone.单纯调强放疗治疗早期鼻咽癌患者的长期疗效。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):327-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.011. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
8
Nasopharyngeal cancer: EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.鼻咽癌:欧洲头颈部肿瘤学会(EHNS)-欧洲肿瘤内科学会(ESMO)-欧洲放射肿瘤学会(ESTRO)诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2010 May;21 Suppl 5:v187-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq186.
9
Is elective irradiation to the lower neck necessary for N0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma?对于 N0 期鼻咽癌,是否有必要对下颈部进行选择性放疗?
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Aug 1;77(5):1397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.062. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
10
The volume to be irradiated during selective neck irradiation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: analysis of the spread patterns in lymph nodes by magnetic resonance imaging.鼻咽癌选择性颈部照射时的照射体积:通过磁共振成像分析淋巴结的扩散模式
Cancer. 2009 Feb 1;115(3):680-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24049.