Suppr超能文献

验证新的咽后淋巴结诊断标准在鼻咽癌患者队列中的疗效。

Verification of the Efficacy of New Diagnostic Criteria for Retropharyngeal Nodes in a Cohort of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients.

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.

Institute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Med Sci. 2021 Aug 13;18(15):3463-3469. doi: 10.7150/ijms.58375. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

A multistage approach to diagnose lateral retropharyngeal nodes (LRPNs) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) had been proposed and warranted for validation. Between 2012 and 2017, the patients with newly diagnosed NPC were enrolled. The responsive nodes or those that progressed during follow-up were positive. The criteria for the multistage approach delimited LRPNs with a minimal axial diameter (MIAD) ≥ 6.1 mm were assessed as positive and if the mean standard uptake value ≥ 2.6, or if the maximal coronal diameter ≥ 25 mm and maximal axial diameter ≥ 8 mm with nodes MIAD < 6.1 mm were also considered as positive. The outcomes were compared with the MIAD cutoff value ≥ 6 mm (traditional method). A chi-squared test was used to compare two areas under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curves. A total of 67 eligible NPC cases and 155 LRPNs (72 positive and 83 negative) were analyzed. The accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of the traditional method were 0.91, 0.93, and 0.89, respectively. The values for the multistage approach all reached 0.94. The area under the curve was significantly greater for the multistage approach compared with the traditional method (p = 0.023). The results support the advantage of the multistage approach.

摘要

一种用于诊断鼻咽癌(NPC)侧咽后淋巴结(LRPNs)的多阶段方法已经提出并需要验证。在 2012 年至 2017 年间,招募了新诊断为 NPC 的患者。有反应的淋巴结或在随访过程中进展的淋巴结为阳性。多阶段方法的标准将最小轴向直径(MIAD)≥6.1mm 的 LRPNs 评估为阳性,如果平均标准摄取值≥2.6,或者如果最大冠状直径≥25mm 且最大轴向直径≥8mm 且淋巴结 MIAD<6.1mm,也被认为是阳性。将结果与 MIAD 截断值≥6mm(传统方法)进行比较。使用卡方检验比较受试者工作特征曲线下的两个区域。共分析了 67 例符合条件的 NPC 病例和 155 个 LRPNs(72 个阳性和 83 个阴性)。传统方法的准确性、特异性和敏感性分别为 0.91、0.93 和 0.89。多阶段方法的所有值均达到 0.94。多阶段方法的曲线下面积明显大于传统方法(p=0.023)。结果支持多阶段方法的优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0d5/8436115/bdc330257121/ijmsv18p3463g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验