• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每日一次 4 克或每日两次 2 克美沙拉嗪治疗活动期溃疡性结肠炎的成本和质量调整生命年差异。

Cost and quality-adjusted life year differences in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis using once-daily 4 g or twice-daily 2g mesalazine dosing.

机构信息

University of Groningen, Department of Pharmacy, Unit of PharmacoEpidemiology & PharmacoEconomics, Groningen, Netherlands; Global Market Access Solutions, Mooresville, NC, USA.

Department of Gastroenterology, Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Crohns Colitis. 2014 May;8(5):357-62. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.09.015. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.crohns.2013.09.015
PMID:24094599
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improved compliance in active ulcerative colitis (UC) is likely to improve healthcare efficiency by reducing time spent in active mild to moderate UC state. To establish whether once daily (OD) mesalazine offers economic advantages over twice daily (BD) dosing in active UC, we evaluated the outcomes and costs of a recently published randomized study.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness model with four week Markov cycles was developed to reflect current treatment practices in the Netherlands with OD and BD mesalazine for active UC. The health service perspective of the Netherlands was reflected in the model and considered a 32week time horizon with 4 weekly Markov cycles. Outcomes evaluated in the model were time spent in active and remission UC and the corresponding health-related quality of life associated with different clinical states. This was then used to derive quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) at each treatment stage.

RESULTS

A greater proportion of subjects on 4 g OD achieved remission at weeks 4 and 8 compared with 2g BD. After 32 weeks the average costs per patient with active UC were €3097 and €3548 for those treated with OD and BD mesalazine respectively, with an average saving of €451 per patient treated with OD mesalazine. The average costs per QALY for OD and BD mesalazine were €5433 and €6324 for OD and BD, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results from a single randomized study, OD dosing resulted in a shorter time spent in active UC which resulted in lower healthcare costs.

摘要

背景

提高活动期溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的依从性,可能通过减少处于活动期轻中度 UC 的时间,提高医疗保健效率。为了确定每日一次(OD)美沙拉嗪与每日两次(BD)剂量相比在活动期 UC 中是否具有经济优势,我们评估了最近发表的一项随机研究的结果和成本。

方法

我们开发了一个具有四周马尔可夫循环的成本效益模型,以反映荷兰目前使用 OD 和 BD 美沙拉嗪治疗活动期 UC 的治疗实践。模型反映了荷兰卫生服务的观点,并考虑了 32 周的时间范围和 4 周的马尔可夫循环。模型中评估的结果是处于活动期和缓解期 UC 的时间以及与不同临床状态相关的相应健康相关生活质量。然后,这被用来推导每个治疗阶段的质量调整生命年(QALY)。

结果

与 2g BD 相比,4g OD 组有更多的患者在第 4 周和第 8 周达到缓解。在 32 周时,处于活动期 UC 的每位患者的平均治疗费用分别为 OD 和 BD 美沙拉嗪治疗的 3097 欧元和 3548 欧元,使用 OD 美沙拉嗪治疗的每位患者平均节省 451 欧元。OD 和 BD 美沙拉嗪的平均每 QALY 成本分别为 5433 欧元和 6324 欧元。

结论

基于一项随机研究的结果,OD 剂量可缩短活动期 UC 的持续时间,从而降低医疗保健成本。

相似文献

1
Cost and quality-adjusted life year differences in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis using once-daily 4 g or twice-daily 2g mesalazine dosing.每日一次 4 克或每日两次 2 克美沙拉嗪治疗活动期溃疡性结肠炎的成本和质量调整生命年差异。
J Crohns Colitis. 2014 May;8(5):357-62. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.09.015. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
2
Randomised clinical trial: once- vs. twice-daily prolonged-release mesalazine for active ulcerative colitis.随机临床试验:比较每日一次与每日两次给予缓释美沙拉嗪治疗活动期溃疡性结肠炎的疗效。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Apr;37(8):767-75. doi: 10.1111/apt.12266. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
3
The economics of mesalazine in active ulcerative colitis and maintenance in the Netherlands.
Neth J Med. 2012 Aug;70(6):272-7.
4
An economic evaluation comparing once daily with twice daily mesalazine for maintaining remission based on results from a randomised controlled clinical trial.基于一项随机对照临床试验的结果,对每日一次与每日两次美沙拉嗪维持缓解进行经济评价。
J Crohns Colitis. 2009 Feb;3(1):32-7. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2008.10.004. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
5
A cost-effectiveness analysis of MMX mesalazine compared with mesalazine in the treatment of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis from a UK perspective.从英国角度出发,对比美沙拉嗪 MMX 与美沙拉嗪治疗轻中度溃疡性结肠炎的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2010 Mar;13(1):148-61. doi: 10.3111/13696990903562861.
6
The cost-utility of high dose oral mesalazine for moderately active ulcerative colitis.高剂量口服美沙拉嗪治疗中度活动性溃疡性结肠炎的成本效用
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Dec 1;28(11-12):1287-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03856.x. Epub 2008 Sep 20.
7
Once- Versus Twice-daily Mesalazine to Induce Remission in Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomised Controlled Trial.每日一次与每日两次美沙拉嗪诱导儿童溃疡性结肠炎缓解的随机对照试验。
J Crohns Colitis. 2017 May 1;11(5):527-533. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw180.
8
Efficacy and safety of once daily versus twice daily mesalazine for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.美沙拉嗪每日一次与每日两次治疗轻至中度溃疡性结肠炎的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(14):e15113. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015113.
9
Once daily versus three times daily mesalazine granules in active ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, non-inferiority trial.美沙拉嗪颗粒每日一次与每日三次治疗活动期溃疡性结肠炎的疗效比较:一项双盲、双模拟、随机、非劣效性试验
Gut. 2009 Feb;58(2):233-40. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.154302. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
10
An economic evaluation comparing concomitant oral and topical mesalazine versus oral mesalazine alone in mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis based on results from randomised controlled trial.基于随机对照试验结果,比较轻中度活动溃疡性结肠炎中同时口服和局部给予美沙拉嗪与单独口服美沙拉嗪的经济学评价。
J Crohns Colitis. 2009 Sep;3(3):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2009.02.005. Epub 2009 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Modelling the benefits of an optimised treatment strategy for 5-ASA in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis.建立模型优化轻度至中度溃疡性结肠炎中 5-ASA 的治疗策略的获益。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2022 Feb;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000853.
2
Economic Evaluations of Treatments for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Literature Review.经济评估治疗炎症性肠病:文献综述。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jun 13;2018:7439730. doi: 10.1155/2018/7439730. eCollection 2018.
3
A systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies comparing conventional, biological and surgical interventions for inflammatory bowel disease.
一项关于比较炎症性肠病的传统、生物和手术干预措施的成本效益研究的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 3;12(10):e0185500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185500. eCollection 2017.
4
Granulo-monocyto apheresis is more effective in mild ulcerative colitis than in moderate to severe disease.粒-单核细胞分离术对轻度溃疡性结肠炎的疗效比对中度至重度疾病的疗效更好。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 7;20(45):17155-62. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.17155.