Suppr超能文献

每日一次 4 克或每日两次 2 克美沙拉嗪治疗活动期溃疡性结肠炎的成本和质量调整生命年差异。

Cost and quality-adjusted life year differences in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis using once-daily 4 g or twice-daily 2g mesalazine dosing.

机构信息

University of Groningen, Department of Pharmacy, Unit of PharmacoEpidemiology & PharmacoEconomics, Groningen, Netherlands; Global Market Access Solutions, Mooresville, NC, USA.

Department of Gastroenterology, Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Crohns Colitis. 2014 May;8(5):357-62. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.09.015. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improved compliance in active ulcerative colitis (UC) is likely to improve healthcare efficiency by reducing time spent in active mild to moderate UC state. To establish whether once daily (OD) mesalazine offers economic advantages over twice daily (BD) dosing in active UC, we evaluated the outcomes and costs of a recently published randomized study.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness model with four week Markov cycles was developed to reflect current treatment practices in the Netherlands with OD and BD mesalazine for active UC. The health service perspective of the Netherlands was reflected in the model and considered a 32week time horizon with 4 weekly Markov cycles. Outcomes evaluated in the model were time spent in active and remission UC and the corresponding health-related quality of life associated with different clinical states. This was then used to derive quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) at each treatment stage.

RESULTS

A greater proportion of subjects on 4 g OD achieved remission at weeks 4 and 8 compared with 2g BD. After 32 weeks the average costs per patient with active UC were €3097 and €3548 for those treated with OD and BD mesalazine respectively, with an average saving of €451 per patient treated with OD mesalazine. The average costs per QALY for OD and BD mesalazine were €5433 and €6324 for OD and BD, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results from a single randomized study, OD dosing resulted in a shorter time spent in active UC which resulted in lower healthcare costs.

摘要

背景

提高活动期溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的依从性,可能通过减少处于活动期轻中度 UC 的时间,提高医疗保健效率。为了确定每日一次(OD)美沙拉嗪与每日两次(BD)剂量相比在活动期 UC 中是否具有经济优势,我们评估了最近发表的一项随机研究的结果和成本。

方法

我们开发了一个具有四周马尔可夫循环的成本效益模型,以反映荷兰目前使用 OD 和 BD 美沙拉嗪治疗活动期 UC 的治疗实践。模型反映了荷兰卫生服务的观点,并考虑了 32 周的时间范围和 4 周的马尔可夫循环。模型中评估的结果是处于活动期和缓解期 UC 的时间以及与不同临床状态相关的相应健康相关生活质量。然后,这被用来推导每个治疗阶段的质量调整生命年(QALY)。

结果

与 2g BD 相比,4g OD 组有更多的患者在第 4 周和第 8 周达到缓解。在 32 周时,处于活动期 UC 的每位患者的平均治疗费用分别为 OD 和 BD 美沙拉嗪治疗的 3097 欧元和 3548 欧元,使用 OD 美沙拉嗪治疗的每位患者平均节省 451 欧元。OD 和 BD 美沙拉嗪的平均每 QALY 成本分别为 5433 欧元和 6324 欧元。

结论

基于一项随机研究的结果,OD 剂量可缩短活动期 UC 的持续时间,从而降低医疗保健成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验