Suppr超能文献

随机临床试验:比较每日一次与每日两次给予缓释美沙拉嗪治疗活动期溃疡性结肠炎的疗效。

Randomised clinical trial: once- vs. twice-daily prolonged-release mesalazine for active ulcerative colitis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Lyon Sud Hospital, Pierre Benite, France.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Apr;37(8):767-75. doi: 10.1111/apt.12266. Epub 2013 Mar 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aminosalicylates are first-choice treatment for mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis (UC); however, multi-dosing regimens are inconvenient.

AIM

To compare the efficacy and safety of once- (OD) vs. twice- (BD) daily prolonged-release mesalazine (Pentasa, Ferring, Saint-Prex, Switzerland) for active mild-to-moderate UC in a non-inferiority study.

METHODS

Eligible patients (n = 206) were randomised to 8 weeks of mesalazine (4 g/day), either OD with two sachets of 2 g mesalazine granules in the morning (n = 102) or BD with one 2 g sachet in the morning and one in the evening (n = 104). Patients also received 4 weeks of mesalazine enema 1 g/day. Disease activity was assessed at randomisation, weeks 4, 8 and 12 using the UC Disease Activity Index (UC-DAI). Clinical and endoscopic remission (primary endpoint) was assessed after 8 weeks. Patients recorded stool frequency and rectal bleeding in a daily diary.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint, non-inferiority in clinical and endoscopic remission with OD vs. BD mesalazine at 8 weeks, was met (intent-to-treat population: 52.1% vs. 41.8%, respectively, 95% confidence interval -3.4, 24.1; P = 0.14). Improvement of UC-DAI score (92% vs. 79%; P = 0.01) and mucosal healing (87.5% vs. 71.1%; P = 0.007) were significantly better, time to remission significantly shorter (26 vs. 28 days; P = 0.04) and safety similar with OD vs. BD dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

When combined with mesalazine enema, prolonged-release mesalazine once-daily 4 g is as effective and well tolerated as 2 g twice-daily for inducing remission in patients with mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00737789).

摘要

背景

氨基水杨酸制剂是轻度至中度活动溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的首选治疗药物;然而,多次剂量方案不太方便。

目的

在一项非劣效性研究中,比较单次(OD)与每日两次(BD)口服延长释放美沙拉嗪(Pentasa,Ferring,Saint-Prex,瑞士)治疗活动期轻度至中度 UC 的疗效和安全性。

方法

符合条件的患者(n = 206)被随机分为 8 周的美沙拉嗪(4 g/天)治疗,分别给予 OD 方案(2 袋 2 g 美沙拉嗪颗粒,每日早晨服用,n = 102)或 BD 方案(每日早晨和晚上各服用 1 袋 2 g 美沙拉嗪,n = 104)。所有患者还接受 4 周的 1 g/天美沙拉嗪灌肠治疗。在随机分组时、第 4、8 和 12 周使用溃疡性结肠炎疾病活动指数(UC-DAI)评估疾病活动度。第 8 周后评估临床和内镜缓解(主要终点)。患者在每日日记中记录粪便频率和直肠出血情况。

结果

OD 与 BD 美沙拉嗪在第 8 周时临床和内镜缓解的非劣效性主要终点达到(意向治疗人群:分别为 52.1%和 41.8%,95%置信区间 -3.4,24.1;P = 0.14)。UC-DAI 评分的改善(92% vs. 79%;P = 0.01)和黏膜愈合(87.5% vs. 71.1%;P = 0.007)显著更好,缓解时间更短(26 天 vs. 28 天;P = 0.04),OD 与 BD 剂量组安全性相似。

结论

当与美沙拉嗪灌肠联合使用时,每日一次口服延长释放美沙拉嗪 4 g 与每日两次口服 2 g 一样有效且耐受良好,可诱导轻度至中度活动溃疡性结肠炎患者缓解(Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT00737789)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验