• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

出生队列不重要吗?对 Reither、Hauser 和 Yang(2009)关于肥胖的年龄-时期-队列研究的评论和模拟研究。

Don't birth cohorts matter? A commentary and simulation exercise on Reither, Hauser, and Yang's (2009) age-period-cohort study of obesity.

机构信息

School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Road, Bristol, BS8 1SS, UK; Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol, 2 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TX, UK.

School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Road, Bristol, BS8 1SS, UK; Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol, 2 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TX, UK.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jan;101:176-80. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.004
PMID:24094683
Abstract

Reither, Hauser, and Yang (2009) use a Hierarchical Age-Period-Cohort model (HAPC - Yang & Land, 2006) to assess changes in obesity in the USA population. Their results suggest that there is only a minimal effect of cohorts, and that it is periods which have driven the increase in obesity over time. We use simulations to show that this result may be incorrect. Using simulated data in which it is cohorts, rather than periods, that are responsible for the rise in obesity, we are able to replicate the period-trending results of Reither et al. In this instance, the HAPC model misses the true cohort trend entirely, erroneously finds a period trend, and underestimates the age trend. Reither et al.'s results may be correct, but because age, period and cohort are confounded there is no way to tell. This is typical of age-period-cohort models, and shows the importance of caution when any APC model is used. We finish with a discussion of ways forward for researchers wishing to model age, period and cohort in a robust and non-arbitrary manner.

摘要

赖瑟、豪泽和杨(2009 年)使用分层年龄-时期-队列模型(HAPC-杨和兰德,2006 年)来评估美国人口中肥胖的变化。他们的结果表明,队列的影响微乎其微,是时期导致了肥胖的持续增加。我们通过模拟表明,这一结果可能是不正确的。我们使用模拟数据,其中是队列而不是时期导致肥胖的增加,我们能够复制赖瑟等人的时期趋势结果。在这种情况下,HAPC 模型完全忽略了真正的队列趋势,错误地发现了一个时期趋势,并低估了年龄趋势。赖瑟等人的结果可能是正确的,但由于年龄、时期和队列相互混淆,因此无法判断。这是年龄-时期-队列模型的典型特征,表明在使用任何 APC 模型时都要谨慎。最后,我们讨论了希望以稳健和非任意方式对年龄、时期和队列进行建模的研究人员的前进方向。

相似文献

1
Don't birth cohorts matter? A commentary and simulation exercise on Reither, Hauser, and Yang's (2009) age-period-cohort study of obesity.出生队列不重要吗?对 Reither、Hauser 和 Yang(2009)关于肥胖的年龄-时期-队列研究的评论和模拟研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jan;101:176-80. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
2
Should age-period-cohort studies return to the methodologies of the 1970s?年龄-时期-队列研究应该回归到20世纪70年代的方法学吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar;128:356-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
3
Should age-period-cohort analysts accept innovation without scrutiny? A response to Reither, Masters, Yang, Powers, Zheng and Land.年龄-时期-队列分析者是否应该不加审查地接受创新?对 Reither、Masters、Yang、Powers、Zheng 和 Land 的回应。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar;128:331-3. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.040. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
4
Clarifying hierarchical age-period-cohort models: A rejoinder to Bell and Jones.澄清分层年龄-时期-队列模型:对贝尔和琼斯的回应
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Nov;145:125-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
5
The hierarchical age-period-cohort model: Why does it find the results that it finds?分层年龄-时期-队列模型:为何会得出这样的结果?
Qual Quant. 2018;52(2):783-799. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0488-5. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
6
Recent advances in age-period-cohort analysis. A commentary on Dregan and Armstrong, and on Reither, Hauser and Yang.年龄-时期-队列分析的最新进展。对德雷根和阿姆斯特朗以及赖瑟、豪泽和杨的评论。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Nov;69(10):1449-51. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.034. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
7
Do birth cohorts matter? Age-period-cohort analyses of the obesity epidemic in the United States.出生队列重要吗?美国肥胖流行的年龄-时期-队列分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Nov;69(10):1439-48. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.08.040. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
8
[Effects of age, period, and cohort on the trends in obesity rate and energy intake ratio from fat in Japanese adults].[年龄、时期和队列对日本成年人肥胖率及脂肪能量摄入比例趋势的影响]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2014;61(8):371-84.
9
Life-course and cohort trajectories of mental health in the UK, 1991-2008--a multilevel age-period-cohort analysis.英国 1991-2008 年心理健康的生命历程和队列轨迹:多层次年龄-时期-队列分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Nov;120:21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
10
Age, period and birth cohort effects on prevalence of overweight and obesity in Australian adults from 1990 to 2000.1990年至2000年澳大利亚成年人超重和肥胖患病率的年龄、时期和出生队列效应
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008 Jul;62(7):898-907. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602769. Epub 2007 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Some simulations of age-period-cohort analysis applying Bayesian regularization: Conditions for using random walk model.一些应用贝叶斯正则化的年龄-时期-队列分析模拟:使用随机游走模型的条件。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 8;20(8):e0329223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329223. eCollection 2025.
2
Social Change and Race-Specific Homicide Trajectories: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis.社会变革与特定种族的杀人轨迹:年龄-时期-队列分析
J Res Crime Delinq. 2024 Mar;61(2):224-267. doi: 10.1177/00224278221129886. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
3
Body mass index and waist circumference trajectories across the life course and birth cohorts, 1996-2015 Malaysia: sex and ethnicity matter.
生命历程和出生队列中体重指数和腰围轨迹,1996-2015 年马来西亚:性别和种族很重要。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2023 Dec;47(12):1302-1308. doi: 10.1038/s41366-023-01391-5. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
4
The mortality risk of being overweight in the twentieth century: Evidence from two cohorts of New Zealand men.20世纪超重人群的死亡风险:来自两组新西兰男性队列的证据。
Explor Econ Hist. 2022 Oct;86. doi: 10.1016/j.eeh.2022.101472. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
5
Age and gender patterns in health service utilisation: Age-Period-Cohort modelling of linked health service usage records.年龄和性别在卫生服务利用方面的模式:基于链接卫生服务使用记录的年龄-时期-队列模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 12;23(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09456-x.
6
Trends in activities of daily living disability among Chinese older adults from 1998 to 2018: an age-period-cohort analysis.1998年至2018年中国老年人日常生活活动能力残疾趋势:年龄-时期-队列分析
Eur J Ageing. 2022 Mar 14;19(4):1167-1179. doi: 10.1007/s10433-022-00690-6. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Are there birth cohort effects in disparities in child obesity by maternal education?母亲受教育程度差异导致儿童肥胖的出生队列效应是否存在?
Int J Obes (Lond). 2021 Mar;45(3):599-608. doi: 10.1038/s41366-020-00724-y. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
8
Clarifying assumptions in age-period-cohort analyses and validating results.阐明年龄-时期-队列分析中的假设并验证结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 6;15(10):e0238871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238871. eCollection 2020.
9
Trends in cannabis use and attitudes toward legalization and use among Australians from 2001-2016: an age-period-cohort analysis.2001-2016 年澳大利亚人吸食大麻的趋势以及对大麻合法化和使用的态度:一项年龄-时期-队列分析。
Addiction. 2021 May;116(5):1152-1161. doi: 10.1111/add.15271. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
10
Ageing and cohort trajectories in mental ill-health: An exploration using multilevel models.老龄化与心理健康队列轨迹:使用多层次模型进行的探索。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 9;15(7):e0235594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235594. eCollection 2020.