Équipe Santé-Plasticité-Motricité, Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG, UMR UJF CNRS 5525, Université Grenoble 1, 38041 Grenoble, France.
Neurophysiol Clin. 2013 Oct;43(4):237-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
An Achilles tendon (AT) vibration is known to disrupt the postural control in standing ("vibration-induced falling", VIF) and to backward tilt the postural vertical in restrained sitting position, suggesting a link between AT vibration and internal representations involved in postural control. A recalibration of some troubles in body orientation by oriented sensory manipulations could be of great clinical interest. In order to use the VIF paradigm in a procedure suitable for a rehabilitation context, AT vibration deserves to be more investigated in sitting, for security reasons, and first in young participants.
In 12 healthy participants (6 men/6 women; 23.3±1.9 years), posturographic data to AT vibrations (85 Hz) were recorded over 30 s standing and 40 s sitting trials.
Surprisingly, four types of differences were found between standing and sitting AT vibrations: presence/absence of VIF and kinesthetic illusion, opposite directions of the centre of foot pressure (CoP) displacements, different temporal profiles. In standing: VIF without kinesthetic illusion, rapid backward shift of CoP with a peak of -54.6±11.3 mm (with respect to baseline P<0.001) 2.8±0.2 s after vibration onset. In sitting: surprising systematic forward shift of the CoP throughout the duration of AT vibration with a maximum of 27.9±18.9 mm (P<0.05 with respect to the baseline) 19.6±0.3 s after vibration onset, associated with a kinesthetic illusion in most subjects.
The present study invalidates our idea to extend in sitting the VIF paradigm but the unexpected results open a new window about the basic mechanisms underlying muscle vibration effects.
已知跟腱(AT)振动会破坏站立时的姿势控制(“振动诱导跌倒”,VIF),并使坐姿中身体的垂直位置向后倾斜,这表明 AT 振动与参与姿势控制的内部表示之间存在联系。通过有针对性的感觉操作对身体定向的某些问题进行重新校准可能具有重要的临床意义。为了在适合康复环境的程序中使用 VIF 范式,出于安全原因,AT 振动在坐姿中值得进一步研究,首先在年轻参与者中进行研究。
在 12 名健康参与者(6 名男性/6 名女性;23.3±1.9 岁)中,记录了 30 秒站立和 40 秒坐姿试验中 AT 振动(85 Hz)的姿势图数据。
令人惊讶的是,在站立和坐姿 AT 振动之间发现了四种差异:VIF 和运动错觉的存在/不存在、足底压力中心(CoP)位移的相反方向、不同的时间曲线。在站立时:VIF 无运动错觉,CoP 快速向后移动,峰值为-54.6±11.3 mm(与基线相比,P<0.001),振动开始后 2.8±0.2 s。在坐姿中:令人惊讶的是,整个 AT 振动过程中 CoP 系统地向前移动,最大移动距离为 27.9±18.9 mm(与基线相比,P<0.05),振动开始后 19.6±0.3 s,大多数受试者伴有运动错觉。
本研究否定了我们将 VIF 范式扩展到坐姿的想法,但意外的结果为肌肉振动效应的基本机制开辟了新的视角。