Key Laboratory of Pesticide and Chemical Biology of Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, P. R. China.
Org Biomol Chem. 2013 Nov 21;11(43):7595-605. doi: 10.1039/c3ob41055b.
It has been difficult to directly measure the spontaneous hydrolysis rate of urea and, thus, 1,1,3,3-tetramethylurea (Me4U) was used as a model to determine the "experimental" rate constant for urea hydrolysis. The use of Me4U was based on an assumption that the rate of urea hydrolysis should be 2.8 times that of Me4U hydrolysis because the rate of acetamide hydrolysis is 2.8 times that of N,N-dimethyl-acetamide hydrolysis. The present first-principles electronic-structure calculations on the competing non-enzymatic hydrolysis pathways have demonstrated that the dominant pathway is the neutral hydrolysis via the CN addition for both urea (when pH < ~11.6) and Me4U (regardless of pH), unlike the non-enzymatic hydrolysis of amides where alkaline hydrolysis is dominant. Based on the computational data, the substituent shift of the free energy barrier calculated for the neutral hydrolysis is remarkably different from that for the alkaline hydrolysis, and the rate constant for the urea hydrolysis should be ~1.3 × 10(9)-fold lower than that (4.2 × 10(-12) s(-1)) measured for the Me4U hydrolysis. As a result, the rate enhancement and catalytic proficiency of urease should be 1.2 × 10(25) and 3 × 10(27) M(-1), respectively, suggesting that urease surpasses proteases and all other enzymes in its power to enhance the rate of reaction. All of the computational results are consistent with available experimental data for Me4U, suggesting that the computational prediction for urea is reliable.
直接测量尿素的自发水解速率一直很困难,因此,1,1,3,3-四甲基脲(Me4U)被用作模型来确定尿素水解的“实验”速率常数。使用 Me4U 的依据是一个假设,即尿素水解的速率应该是 Me4U 水解的 2.8 倍,因为乙酰胺水解的速率是 N,N-二甲基乙酰胺水解的 2.8 倍。目前对竞争的非酶促水解途径的第一性原理电子结构计算表明,对于尿素(当 pH < ~11.6)和 Me4U(无论 pH 如何),主导途径都是通过 CN 加成的中性水解,而不是酰胺的非酶促水解,其中碱性水解占主导地位。基于计算数据,对于中性水解计算的自由能垒取代的取代基与碱性水解的自由能垒取代的取代基明显不同,并且尿素水解的速率常数应该比 Me4U 水解的速率常数(4.2×10(-12) s(-1))低约 1.3×10(9)倍。因此,脲酶的速率增强和催化效率应该分别为 1.2×10(25)和 3×10(27) M(-1),这表明脲酶在提高反应速率方面超过了蛋白酶和所有其他酶。所有的计算结果都与 Me4U 的可用实验数据一致,表明对尿素的计算预测是可靠的。