• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙科学学生评估的三级跳远检查。

Triple jump examinations for dental student assessment.

机构信息

Ostrow School of Dentistry, DEN 218, University of Southern California, 925 W. 34 Street, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0641;.

出版信息

J Dent Educ. 2013 Oct;77(10):1315-20.

PMID:24098035
Abstract

The triple jump examination (TJE) attempts to assess a higher level of learning with demand for analysis, critical thinking, and resolution of problems presented by written scenarios based on patient care situations. The purpose of this study was to examine the internal consistency, scale reliability, and interrater reliability of the TJE used at the Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California. On the sample of 2,227 examinations administered by seventy-seven raters across a three-year time period, the Cronbach's coefficient alpha for internal consistency of the overall TJE was found to be good (a=0.869). The internal consistency of the three subscales was found to be acceptable (a=0.731), good (a=0.820), and good (a=0.820). Average and single measures intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for scale reliability were significant at p<0.001, indicating strong interrater reliability. There were no statistically significant differences (p≤0.05) in the mean scores assigned on the TJE between rater groups defined by rater experience level with the TJE. A very high level of agreement among rater pairs was also observed. Across the entire three-year study period, with over 19,152 ratings, the seventy-seven raters were in general agreement 99.5 percent of the time and in exact agreement 77.2 percent of the time.

摘要

三级跳远考试(TJE)试图评估更高层次的学习,要求考生根据患者护理情况的书面情景分析、批判性思维和解决问题。本研究的目的是检验南加州大学奥斯特罗牙科学校使用的 TJE 的内部一致性、量表信度和评分者间信度。在 77 名评分者在三年时间内进行的 2227 次考试样本中,整体 TJE 的克朗巴赫系数阿尔法的内部一致性被发现是良好的(a=0.869)。三个分量表的内部一致性被发现是可接受的(a=0.731)、良好的(a=0.820)和良好的(a=0.820)。量表可靠性的平均和单一度量组内相关系数(ICC)在 p<0.001 时具有统计学意义,表明评分者间具有很强的信度。在 TJE 评分者经验水平定义的评分者组之间,TJE 的平均分数分配没有统计学上的显著差异(p≤0.05)。评分者对之间也观察到非常高的一致性。在整个三年的研究期间,有超过 19152 次评分,77 名评分者总体上有 99.5%的时间达成一致,有 77.2%的时间达成完全一致。

相似文献

1
Triple jump examinations for dental student assessment.牙科学学生评估的三级跳远检查。
J Dent Educ. 2013 Oct;77(10):1315-20.
2
Triple jump examination evaluation of faculty examiners by dental student examinees.学生检查者对教师检查者的三级跳远检查评估。
J Dent Educ. 2014 May;78(5):714-22.
3
The rationale for and implementation of learner-centered education: experiences at the Ostrow School of Dentistry of the University of Southern California.以学习者为中心的教育的基本原理和实施:南加州大学欧斯特罗牙科医学院的经验。
J Dent Educ. 2014 Feb;78(2):165-80.
4
A method for assessing reflective journal writing.一种评估反思性日志写作的方法。
J Allied Health. 2005 Winter;34(4):199-208.
5
Evaluation of a new assessment tool in problem-based learning tutorials in dental education.基于问题的学习教程中新型评估工具的评估在牙医学教育中的应用。
J Dent Educ. 2011 May;75(5):665-71.
6
Comparison of three evidence-based practice learning assessment methods in dental curricula.牙科课程中三种循证实践学习评估方法的比较
J Dent Educ. 2015 Feb;79(2):146-56.
7
Validity and reliability of portfolio assessment of student competence in two dental school populations: a four-year study.在两个牙科学校人群中评估学生能力的组合评估的有效性和可靠性:一项为期四年的研究。
J Dent Educ. 2014 May;78(5):657-67.
8
An assessment strateqy whose time has come for documenting competency in dental education and beyond.一种评估策略,其适用于记录牙科教育及其他领域能力的时代已经到来。
J Am Coll Dent. 2010 Summer;77(2):22-6.
9
Problem-based learning in undergraduate dental education: faculty development at the University of Southern California School of Dentistry.本科牙科教育中的基于问题的学习:南加州大学牙科学院的教师发展
J Prosthodont. 2007 Sep-Oct;16(5):394-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00216.x. Epub 2007 Jun 9.
10
Measuring the Level of Reflective Ability of Predoctoral Dental Students: Early Outcomes in an e-Portfolio Reflection.测量牙科博士前学生的反思能力水平:电子档案袋反思的早期结果
J Dent Educ. 2019 Mar;83(3):275-280. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.025. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Group Learning Assessments as a Vital Consideration in the Implementation of New Peer Learning Pedagogies in the Basic Science Curriculum of Health Profession Programs.在健康职业项目基础科学课程中实施新的同伴学习教学法时,小组学习评估是一个至关重要的考量因素。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2016 Aug 22;3. doi: 10.4137/JMECD.S18930. eCollection 2016 Jan-Dec.