• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

网络辅助数据使用知情同意书。

Informed Consent for Web Paradata Use.

作者信息

Couper Mick P, Singer Eleanor

机构信息

Survey Research Center, University of Michigan.

出版信息

Surv Res Methods. 2013;7(1):57-67.

PMID:24098312
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3790572/
Abstract

Survey researchers are making increasing use of paradata - such as keystrokes, clicks, and timestamps - to evaluate and improve survey instruments but also to understand respondents and how they answer surveys. Since the introduction of paradata, researchers have been asking whether and how respondents should be informed about the capture and use of their paradata while completing a survey. In a series of three vignette-based experiments, we examine alternative ways of informing respondents about capture of paradata and seeking consent for their use. In all three experiments, any mention of paradata lowers stated willingness to participate in the hypothetical surveys. Even the condition where respondents were asked to consent to the use of paradata at the end of an actual survey resulted in a significant proportion declining. Our research shows that requiring such explicit consent may reduce survey participation without adequately informing survey respondents about what paradata are and why they are being used.

摘要

调查研究人员越来越多地利用副数据(如击键、点击和时间戳)来评估和改进调查工具,同时也用于了解受访者以及他们回答调查的方式。自从引入副数据以来,研究人员一直在询问,在完成调查时,是否以及如何告知受访者其副数据的收集和使用情况。在一系列三个基于 vignette 的实验中,我们研究了告知受访者副数据收集情况并寻求其使用同意的替代方法。在所有三个实验中,任何关于副数据的提及都会降低表示愿意参与假设调查的意愿。即使在实际调查结束时要求受访者同意使用副数据的情况下,也有很大比例的人拒绝。我们的研究表明,要求这种明确同意可能会降低调查参与度,而没有充分告知受访者什么是副数据以及为什么要使用它们。

相似文献

1
Informed Consent for Web Paradata Use.网络辅助数据使用知情同意书。
Surv Res Methods. 2013;7(1):57-67.
2
Privacy Attitudes toward Mouse-Tracking Paradata Collection.对鼠标追踪辅助数据收集的隐私态度。
Public Opin Q. 2023 Aug 9;87(Suppl 1):602-618. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfad034. eCollection 2023.
3
Communicating disclosure risk in informed consent statements.在知情同意声明中传达披露风险。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Sep;5(3):1-8. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.1.
4
Paradata analyses to inform population-based survey capture of pregnancy outcomes: EN-INDEPTH study.元数据分析以告知基于人群的调查对妊娠结局的捕获:EN-INDEPTH 研究。
Popul Health Metr. 2021 Feb 8;19(Suppl 1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12963-020-00241-0.
5
Paradata: a new data source from web-administered measures.辅助数据:一种来自网络管理措施的新数据源。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2010 Nov-Dec;28(6):333-42; quiz 343-4. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181f698fd.
6
The use of advanced web-based survey design in Delphi research.在 Delphi 研究中使用先进的基于网络的调查设计。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Dec;73(12):3168-3177. doi: 10.1111/jan.13381. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
7
Nonresponse and Underreporting Errors Increase over the Data Collection Week Based on Paradata from the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey.根据全国家庭食品获取与购买调查的辅助数据,无回应和漏报误差在数据收集周期间有所增加。
J Nutr. 2017 May;147(5):964-975. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.240697. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
8
The power of online panel paradata to predict unit nonresponse and voluntary attrition in a longitudinal design.在线面板辅助数据在纵向设计中预测单位无应答和自愿退出的能力。
Qual Quant. 2023;57(2):1055-1078. doi: 10.1007/s11135-022-01385-x. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
9
A two-phase sampling survey for nonresponse and its paradata to correct nonresponse bias in a health surveillance survey.一项针对无应答及其辅助数据的两阶段抽样调查,以纠正健康监测调查中的无应答偏差。
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2017 Feb;65(1):71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2016.10.059. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
10
Experimental Studies of Disclosure Risk, Disclosure Harm, Topic Sensitivity, and Survey Participation.披露风险、披露危害、主题敏感性和调查参与度的实验研究。
J Off Stat. 2010 Jun;26(2):287-300.

引用本文的文献

1
Current limitations in technology-based cognitive assessment for severe mental illnesses: a focus on feasibility, reliability, and ecological validity.严重精神疾病基于技术的认知评估的当前局限性:关注可行性、可靠性和生态效度。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2025 Apr 7;19:1543005. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1543005. eCollection 2025.
2
Privacy Attitudes toward Mouse-Tracking Paradata Collection.对鼠标追踪辅助数据收集的隐私态度。
Public Opin Q. 2023 Aug 9;87(Suppl 1):602-618. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfad034. eCollection 2023.
3
Increasing the Acceptance of Smartphone-Based Data Collection.提高对基于智能手机的数据收集的接受度。
Public Opin Q. 2023 Jun 12;87(2):357-388. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfad019. eCollection 2023 Summer.
4
Reliability and Validity of Noncognitive Ecological Momentary Assessment Survey Response Times as an Indicator of Cognitive Processing Speed in People's Natural Environment: Intensive Longitudinal Study.非认知性生态瞬时评估调查反应时间作为自然环境中认知加工速度指标的可靠性和有效性:密集纵向研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 May 30;11:e45203. doi: 10.2196/45203.
5
Digital dashboards with paradata can improve data quality where disease surveillance relies on real-time data collection.对于疾病监测依赖实时数据收集的情况,带有辅助数据的数字仪表盘可以提高数据质量。
Digit Health. 2023 Apr 2;9:20552076231164098. doi: 10.1177/20552076231164098. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
6
Sharing Data Collected with Smartphone Sensors: Willingness, Participation, and Nonparticipation Bias.共享通过智能手机传感器收集的数据:意愿、参与情况及不参与偏差。
Public Opin Q. 2021 Sep 3;85(Suppl 1):423-462. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfab025. eCollection 2021.
7
Understanding Willingness to Share Smartphone-Sensor Data.了解分享智能手机传感器数据的意愿。
Public Opin Q. 2021 Feb 13;84(3):725-759. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfaa044. eCollection 2020 Fall.
8
The Effect of Framing and Placement on Linkage Consent.框架和位置对连锁同意的影响。
Public Opin Q. 2019 Jul;83(Suppl 1):289-308. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfz018. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
9
Willingness to Participate in Passive Mobile Data Collection.参与被动移动数据收集的意愿。
Public Opin Q. 2019 Jul;83(Suppl 1):210-235. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfz007. Epub 2019 Jun 6.

本文引用的文献

1
The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.《贝尔蒙报告》。保护人类研究受试者的伦理原则与准则。
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13.
2
Experimental Studies of Disclosure Risk, Disclosure Harm, Topic Sensitivity, and Survey Participation.披露风险、披露危害、主题敏感性和调查参与度的实验研究。
J Off Stat. 2010 Jun;26(2):287-300.
3
Risk of Disclosure, Perceptions of Risk, and Concerns about Privacy and Confidentiality as Factors in Survey Participation.作为调查参与因素的信息披露风险、风险认知以及对隐私和保密的担忧。
J Off Stat. 2008;24(2):255-275.
4
Communicating disclosure risk in informed consent statements.在知情同意声明中传达披露风险。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Sep;5(3):1-8. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.1.
5
Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: description and an illustration.调查参与的杠杆显著性理论:描述与示例
Public Opin Q. 2000 Fall;64(3):299-308. doi: 10.1086/317990.